Jesus was NOT a Jew–Benjamin Freedman

April 26, 2010

This is one amazing conversion (from Judaism to Christianity) that you’ve probably never heard about, at least from your pastor. Most evangelical Christians believe Jesus was a Jew. Yes, even the bumper stickers proclaim to the uninformed “My boss is a Jewish carpenter.” Political Zionist outfit Bridges for Peace that masquerades as a religious organization, says Jesus was a Jew who “was Israel-centered” (Israel Teaching Letter, May 2010, p.7). But how can a person’s boss be a Jewish carpenter when the word Jew was not even invented back then? Anyway, if you’re interested in what this former Jew had to say, Henry Makow provides some excerpts from a letter. Also, you can hear Benjamin Freedman’s historic speech or read the speech here.

Encore from Dec. 2009 by Request

Excerpts from a long letter from Benjamin Freedman (left) to David Goldstein, LL.D. dated October 10, 1954. Freedman (1890-1984) had been part of the American Zionist inner circle but, like Goldstein, converted to Christianity. The complete letter appeared in a pamphlet entitled “Facts are Facts.”

(Excerpts by Henry Makow)

The utterance by the Christian clergy which confuses Christians the most is the constantly repeated utterance that “Jesus was a Jew.” … That misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact is uttered by the Christian clergy upon the slightest pretext….

Jesus Christ was not a so-called or self-styled “Jew”. During His lifetime Jesus was known as a “Judean” by His contemporaries and not as a “Jew”, and Jesus referred to Himself as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew”.

…Except for His few followers at that time in Judea, all other Judeans abhorred Jesus and detested His teachings and the things for which He stood.

At the time of the Crucifixion of Jesus Pontius Pilate was the administrator in Judea for the Roman Empire.  As far as he was concerned officially or personally, the inhabitants of Judea were “Judeans”  and not so- called “Jews” as they have been styled since the 18th century. In the time of Pontius Pilate, there was no religious, racial or national group in Judea known as “Jews” nor had there been any group so identified anywhere else in the world prior to that time.

Pontius Pilate expressed little interest as the administrator of the Roman Empire officially or personally in the wide variety of forms of religious worship then practiced in Judea. These forms of religious worship extended from phallic worship and other forms of idolatry to the emerging spiritual philosophy of an eternal, omnipotent and invisible Divine deity, the emerging Yahve (Jehovah) concept which predated Abraham of Bible fame by approximately 2000 years. …

As I have explained, when the word “Jew” was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century, its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was “Judean”. However during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well- financed international “pressure group” created a so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” among the English- speaking peoples of the world. This so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word “Jew”. It is a misrepresentation.

…    The United States Supreme Court has recognized the “secondary meaning” of words. The highest court in the land has established as basic law that “secondary meanings” can acquire priority rights to the use of any dictionary word. Well-planned and well-financed world-wide publicity through every available media by well-organized groups of so-called or self-styled “Jews” for three centuries has created a “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” which has completely “blacked out” the original and correct meaning of the word “Jew”. There can be no doubt about that.

There is not a person in the whole English-speaking world today who regards a “Jew” as a “Judean” in the literal sense of the word. That was the correct and only meaning in the 18th century. The generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today with practically no exceptions is made up of four almost universally-believed theories. These four theories are that a so- called or self-styled “Jew” is (1) a person who today professes the form of religious worship known as “Judaism”, (2) a person who claims to belong to a racial group associated with the ancient Semites, (3) a person directly the descendant of an ancient nation which thrived in Palestine in Bible history, (4) a person blessed by Divine intentional design with certain superior cultural characteristics denied to other racial, religious or national groups, all rolled into one.

The present generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. The implications, inferences and innuendos of the word “Jew” today, to the preponderant majority of intelligent and informed Christians, is contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact. Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their pet theme song “Jesus was a Jew”. It actually now approaches a psychosis.

Countless Christians know today that they were “brainwashed” by the Christian clergy on the subject “Jesus was a Jew”. ..

Countless intelligent and informed Christians no longer accept unchallenged assertions by the Christian clergy that Jesus in His lifetime was a Member of a group in Judea which practiced a religious form of worship then which is today called “Judaism”, or that Jesus in His lifetime here on earth was a Member of the racial group which today includes the preponderant majority of all so- called or self-styled “Jews” in the world, or that the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today are the lineal descendants of the nation in Judea of which Jesus was a national in His lifetime here on earth, or that the cultural characteristics of so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today correspond with the cultural characteristics of Jesus during His lifetime here on earth and His teachings while He was here on earth for a brief stay. Christians will no longer believe that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus and the race, religion, nationality and culture of so-called or self-styled “Jews” today or their ancestors have a common origin or character.

The resentment by Christians is more ominous than the Christian clergy suspect. Under existing conditions the Christian clergy will find that ignorance is not bliss, nor wisdom folly. Christians everywhere today are seeking to learn the authentic relationship between the so-called or self-styled “Jews” through-out the world today and the “Judeans” who populated “Judea” before, during and after the time of Jesus. Christians now insist that they be told correctly by the Christian clergy about the racial, religious, national and cultural background of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today and the basis for associating these backgrounds with the racial, religious, national and cultural background of Jesus in His lifetime in Judea. The intelligent and informed Christian are alerted to the exploded myth that the so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today are the direct descendants of the “Judeans” amongst whom Jesus lived during His lifetime here on earth.

Christians are becoming more and more aware day by day of all the economic and political advantages accruing to the so-called or self- styled “Jews” as a direct result of their success in making Christians believe that “Jesus was a Jew” in the “secondary meaning” they have created for the 18th century word “Jew”. The so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today represent themselves to Christians as “Jews” only in the “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew”. They seek to thereby prove their kinship with Jesus. They emphasize this fiction to Christians constantly. That fable is fast fading and losing its former grip upon the imaginations of Christians.

To allege that “Jesus was a Jew” in the sense that during His lifetime Jesus professed and practiced the form of religious worship known and practiced under the modern name of “Judaism” is false and fiction of the most blasphemous nature.

If to be a so- called or self-styled “Jew” then or now the practice of “Judaism” was a requirement, then Jesus certainly was not a so-called “Jew”. Jesus abhorred and denounced the form of religious worship practiced in Judea in His lifetime and which is known and practiced today under its new name “Judaism”. That religious belief was then known as “Pharisaism”. The Christian clergy learned that in their theological seminary days but they have never made any attempt to make that clear to Christians.

Interview with Shlomo Sand, author of “Invention of Jewish People” (Youtube)
Palestinian Arabs are more likely descendants of Biblical Hebrews than Ashkenazis.

Sand’s theory is that Jews were converts to the “religion” over time from different ethnic backgrounds.  “Shattering the National Mythology”

Tea Party alert

April 19, 2010

National Prayer Network


By Rev. Ted Pike
15 Apr 10

The Jewish Anti-Defamation League says alleged racial slurs by Tea Party protestors against Congress members last month are “hate speech” and not protected by the First Amendment. According to ADL, Tea Party protestors “crossed the line” with racial slurs against black Congressmen. Such slurs, ADL head Abe Foxman contends, “are not constitutionally protected, and require a strong legal response.”

Foxman says, “Four months ago, ADL documented an undercurrent of rage sweeping across the United States. Unfortunately, that rage is spreading, like a rash, creeping steadily from the fringes of our society into the mainstream. Our leaders should demand criminal prosecution for those who cross the line.”

Really? Such slurs are socially repugnant—and often unconstitutionally prosecuted under ADL-inspired state and local hate crime statutes. But racial, “homophobic,” and “anti-Semitic” slurs are protected by the First Amendment. Threat of imminent violence against a Congressman is illegal. But tolerance of slurs as well as profane, obscene, and blasphemous speech is a necessary side effect of America’s unique efforts to protect speech as much as possible. The government can’t prosecute people for hurting others’ feelings!

Several months ago, Democratic leadership responded to Rep. Wilson’s public accusation that President Obama was a “liar” by severely limiting Congressional members’ freedom to criticize the President. If Republican and Democrat leadership take Foxman’s advice and go a step further, they will criminalize perhaps offensive, yet constitutionally protected, speech by Tea Party members as well.

How would this draconian speech ban be enforced? By ADL’s readymade federal hate crimes law!

The hate crimes law criminalizes not just violent hate crimes but also general bias crimes against persons or property. ADL considers public slurs against protected groups a hate crime in the dozens of hate crime bureaucracies it has created worldwide. If Congress follows its recommendations, the US Justice Department could initiate test indictments for statements that are racially or sexually derisive. In appeals courts, liberal judges would likely uphold the federal interest, outlawing the bias and words that ostensibly lead to crimes of prejudice. The hate law would thus morph into a full-blown speech crimes law. With such precedent the government could also criminalize much “seditious,” “violence-inciting,” and “terrorist” hate speech at Tea Party protests and online.

The hate law is also meant to “prevent” hate crimes. This suggests a federal mandate to discourage the biased thoughts and words which the government views as causing hate crimes. The Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act is also meant to prosecute hate crimes “and for other purposes”—known only to its framer, ADL.

The ADL just produced a 20-page report, “Violent Voices: Anti-Government Extremism Takes on New Intensity.” The report gives examples of “hate speech” now proliferating on the internet and suggests these words will lead to violence. ADL says, “We are deeply concerned about the current trend and about the fact that a significant minority is coming to believe that methods of peaceful protest have failed and the time has come where violence may be necessary or justified.  If this trend continues, the Hutaree arrests may come to be seen not as the culmination, but rather as the first step in a necessary and significant national law enforcement operation. ”

Our Right to “Threaten” Government

Freedom of speech and conscience should mean that if Americans believe a member of Congress truly betrayed our nation and Constitution they have the right to say so. In the early 1950s, Americans demanded the execution of atomic spies Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Today, they have the same right to the opinion that, following due process, execution of a treasonous public official is justified. A government guilty of treason also deserves a violent end. This last, desperate option is upheld by the Constitution, and millions now believe revolution may be publicly advocated.

Contrary to ADL’s depiction of such verbal sentiment as unlawful, this view springs primarily from patriotic conviction, not “hate.” Although countless Americans may now hold this opinion, it does not mean they intend to imminently execute traitors. It is not in the same category as sending an email to one’s Congressman, threatening to kill him at his next town hall meeting. Yet if ADL is successful in making slurs indictable, soon all who “threaten” government officials through “uncivil” speech could be viewed as hate criminals. Several years ago, a Canadian angrily emailed his Member of Parliament for permitting excessive immigration. The MP filed hate crimes charges under ADL’s Canadian hate laws, and the charges were upheld.

Since the number of Americans now uttering “seditious” sentiments is so large, ADL is clearly beginning to condition the public to believe that sweeping legislative action and prosecution may be necessary to preserve order.

Jewish Left Infiltrating Tea Party

The vulnerability of Tea Party members to such prosecution is heightened by the efforts of the organized Jewish left to infiltrate Tea Party meetings with “agent provocateurs.” These activists want to bring the Tea Party into disrepute through manufactured abuses. In its article, “Foes of Tea Party Movement to Infiltrate Rallies,” Yahoo News says,

“Opponents of the fiscally conservative tea party movement say they plan to infiltrate and dismantle the political group by trying to make its members appear to be racist, homophobic, and moronic. Jason Levin, creator of said Monday the group has 65 leaders in major cities across the country who are trying to recruit members to infiltrate tea party events for April 15 th–tax filing day, when tea party groups across the country are planning to gather and protest high taxes…Levin says they want to exaggerate the group’s least appealing qualities, further distance the tea party from mainstream America and damage the public’s opinion of them.”

This could well include yelling racist, anti-Semitic, or homophobic slurs.

What will keep these Jewish provocateurs, shouting slurs, from themselves being indicted under possible hate law enforcement? Simple. Attorney-General Eric Holder made perfectly clear last spring in the hate bill’s Senate Judiciary hearing that Jews are protected from indictment under the hate law. Meanwhile, indicted whites, Christians, and conservatives face at least triple penalties. If a Jewish provocateur did shout the “N” word and were arrested, it is unlikely a local governing body would prosecute him as a hate criminal. But if a white Christian Tea party member did so, he could face possible years of imprisonment under ADL’s state and federal hate laws. (See, NPN video ‘Holder Admits: No Equality Under Hate Bill’ at

Time for Wisdom, Not Violence

If the militia, Tea Party, and far right activists can retain self-control for the next six months, both US Senate and House can be restructured at midterms in November. This could revive hopes and confidence in legislative reform via public input and ballot, not bullet! But if right wing bigotry and violence erupt, it will delight the circling wolves of liberals and Jewish media, who will go in for the kill. Already, Jewish-dominated NBC is preparing a primetime special against the “Christian” Hutaree and militia. As master myth makers, Jewish media will create new mythologies surrounding the right in America. They will rival those already enshrined in history books against Nazism and Sen. Joseph McCarthy. (See, Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish)

If the right cannot control itself, it may end all hopes of national restoration. In 1989 the Chinese people rose in patriotic wrath and idealism, marching on Beijing to “throw the bums out.” But they were repulsed by tanks and machine guns in Tiananmen Square. Today, all hopes of freedom in China are extinguished. The Chinese now content themselves with materialism. Anyone who militates against the government is considered worse than a madman. If the present populist revolt fails, America will probably plunge into the same fatalistic hopelessness.

Is there hope? Yes, if the Right doesn’t destroy itself.

Rev. Ted Pike is director of the National Prayer Network, a Christian/conservative watchdog organization.

TALK SHOW HOSTS: Interview Rev. Ted Pike on this subject. Call (503) 631-3808.

The freedom-saving outreach of Rev. Ted Pike and the National Prayer Network is solely supported by sale of books, videos and your financial support. All gifts are tax-deductible.

Christian Zionism kills America’s populist revolt

April 13, 2010

If you believe that Jewish supremacists, whose ancestors founded communism, are ordained of God, then read no further. But if you’d like to read a different viewpoint, here’s what Rev. Ted Pike has to say:

A fanatic is “possessed by an excessive and irrational zeal for a religious or political cause” (American Heritage Dictionary). Today, two types of fanaticism threaten the safety of our republic and the future of our populist revolt. The first is Christian Zionism. The second is right-wing calls for violence.
Contradicting the Bible, Christian Zionism says Jews and Israel are favored above all other races and nations, no matter what they do. Most Christian Zionists believe God will curse anyone who criticizes Israel. Jewish supremacists-whose ancestors founded communism and its offspring, liberalism-today corrupt the Gentile world through their predominant influence in international banking, Congress, and big media. (See, Jewish Activists Created Communism and Jews Confirm Big Media Is Jewish) This weakening of Gentile power is encouraged by Jewish Talmudic/Kabbalistic scripture so that the Jewish messiah can someday rule the nations.
Nevertheless, most Christian evangelicals ignorantly preach and practice ironclad non-criticism of everything Jewish. This formula is taken so far that no major Christian, conservative leadership group will criticize the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, despite its anti-Christian, pro-homosexual agenda and creation of Christian-persecuting hate crime laws worldwide.
The second fanaticism that threatens freedom is revealed in those who call for imminent violence to overthrow our government. An example may be the nine Hutaree militia members who allegedly planned to jumpstart revolution by killing a policeman, then bombing police at his funeral. If guilty as charged, the Hutaree held both forms of fanaticism. Their website displays “Seven Reasons Why Christians Should Support Israel.” Contrary to media spin, they were not anti-Semitic. Their stated intent of supporting Israel unconditionally is the same position held by Pastor John Hagee, Dr. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. A militia leader told me that in 2007 he visited the now arrested leader of the Hutarees, David Brian Stone; he said Stone’s headquarters were decorated with flags of Israel and the leader angrily denounced any critique of Israel as “anti-Semitic.”
Renewal Will Be Undermined
This underscores an ominous reality. Pro-Israel fanaticism, with its welcoming invitation to supremacist Jews, runs so deep everywhere in the Christian right that it would continue, even if a government overthrow did take place. The pattern of supremacist Jews hijacking a conservative “revolution” already occurred in recent history. In 1980, Ronald Reagan accomplished his own coup against liberalism. The “Reagan Revolution” brought new respect for conservatism in America. Immediately, Jews flooded the movement, creating the Jewish “neoconservative” faction of the Republican Party.
This Jewish lobby’s insistence on special favors to Israel helped pressure Pres. George W. Bush to invade Iraq, protecting Israel from Saddam’s “weapons of mass destruction” ­ which were never found. The same Jewish neo-cons goaded Bush to invade Afghanistan after 9/11, again to secure the safety of Israel. These two wars, promoted by Israeli dual-loyalists high in Republican circles, gave the Democrats the anti-war issue they needed to end Republican credibility and elect Obama. Now, the same pressure is witheringly applied on the Obama administration to take military action against Iran, again to insure the safety of a greater Israel.
What does America really need?
Through education and return to sound, Biblical interpretation, we need to overthrow the power of Jewish supremacism. It will do little good to topple the present government if this is not confronted. With incredible speed, supremacist Jews will only resurface like toxic mushrooms after a thundershower. Incredibly, triumphant evangelicals like Sarah Palin would be the first to invite such Jews to participate. A violent revolution would only substitute one Jewish-controlled government for another.
Instead, there must be a complete willingness to examine Jewish power and motives, and how they brought us to the straits we are in. Up to this point, Christian, conservative leaders have refused such inquiry. What America needs now is not radical revolution-but radical reevaluation of how supremacist Jews have ruined, and will continue to ruin, our hopes.

Canada-Israel friendship postage stamp issue: a correction

April 11, 2010

Canada-Israel stamp

Corrected Canada-Israel stamp

Ziofascism website reminds us what Canada-Israel friendship means to Canadians:

  • Thanks for using Canadian Passports for your terror assassinations and putting Canadians at risk.
  • Thank you for the wars that your agents in Canada and the USA lobbied for.
  • Thank you for the elimination of free speech, that your agents in Canada successfully achieved.  Now no Zionist can have their feelings hurt without consequences for the speaker of ‘hate speech’.
  • Thank you for Israelification of the airports and security.  Why shouldn’t Canadians be strip searched just like Palestinians?
  • Thank you for having your terrorist organization the Mossad stalking Montreal’s subway and Vancouver and Calgary airports.  When the next pretext is needed for sweeping changes, we shall expect the imprimateur of the Seal of Solomon to be visible in the carnage.
  • Thanks for the free trips to Isr-el for Canadian polluticians, where they are indocrtrinated and bribed.

World’s best free speech lawyer says Canada on the “road to tyranny”

April 10, 2010

Douglas Christie is Canada’s most prolific defender of free speech, having appeared in the Supreme Court of Canada in the defense of freedom of speech more times than any other counsel in Canada, where he has consistently argued against laws repressing free speech, and for individual liberty.

In April 2010, right after American Christian Zionist Ann Coulter was told to shut up, Mr. Christie appeared at the University of Ottawa, Canada. In a shining speech for freedom that matched any speech of the founding fathers of the USA or Canada, his student audience listened with rapt attention. For Canadians who have lived for over 30 years with Communist/Zionist-inspired “hate laws”, Mr. Christie’s opening sentences were well understood by freedom of speech advocates. Said Christie:

I’m here to talk about free speech. I’m not here to practice it.

Unlike Ann Coulter, I don’t need a warning from the provost. I am a Canadian, trained by law in the way of silence, sullen silence, and code language. I have been trained by the Supreme Court not to engage in hate speech, even though no one can define it in advance, so I can avoid it.

After a short speech that ought to be recorded in the history books, Mr. Christie concluded by saying:

I have not said anything. More than anything, I have been allowed to speak here without interruption on the belief I would be ineffectual and secondly I would make the administration look better than the last speaker who was cancelled. I realized this at the beginning, but it is an opportunity to make the point that the redemption of an individual like me, or a society like your university, or of a country like Canada, is only possible if we listen to each other and talk openly about all of our serious and sensitive issues. Unless this really happens, Canada isn’t worth saving and neither is this university.

I will leave here knowing more than anyone in this room about the battles for free speech that have gone on in this country in the last thirty years. I see only minor changes occurring. This is your chance to ask what you need to know to make a difference.

Cancer cure: 90 percent success rate with sodium bicarbonate?

April 6, 2010

About 400 years ago God gave a struggling German Christian mathematician the laws of planetary motion still used today. So why wouldn’t God give a modern-day cancer doctor some insight into cancer treatment?

Maybe God has, and we haven’t much heard about it. Why? I believe it is because the New World Order (NWO) control freaks do not want a cure; they want only the money that comes from looking for a cure because it’s more profitable for the drug companies.

Dr. T. Simoncini of Rome, Italy treats cancer patients with sodium bicarbonate, and with a high success rate (close to 90%). I like his “medicine” because sodium bicarbonate can’t be patented by NWO drug companies. The NWO  control freaks are out to destroy this doctor of oncology, which is why I like to visit his website. Obviously, some of my friends think I’m crazy, and maybe I am, but I still would like to be an informed patient if ever I am diagnosed with cancer. Check out the oncology doctor’s website and I think you’ll be quite surprised. Is he a quack doctor? Not to the patients here.

And I’ll close with this account of his first cured patient posted on the doctor’s website:

One of the first patients I treated was an 11-year-old child, a case which immediately gave me the indication that I was following the right path. The child arrived in coma at the pediatric hematology ward around 11:30 in the morning with a clinical history of leukemia. Because of the disease the child had been transferred from a small town in Sicily to Rome, going through the universities of Palermo and Naples, where he underwent several chemotherapy sessions. The desperate mother told me that she had been unable to speak with the child for the past 15 days, that is, since the child had departed on his journey through the hospitals. She said she would have given the world to hear her son’s voice once again before he died. As I was of the opinion that the child was comatose both because of the brain invasion by the fungin colonies and because of the toxicity of the therapies that had been performed, I concluded that if I could destroy the colonies with sodium bicarbonate salts and at the same time nourish and detoxify the brain with glucose phleboclysis, I could hope for a regression of the symptomatology.

And so it was. After a continuous infusion with phleboclysis of bicarbonate and glucose solutions, I found the child speaking with his mother, who was crying, at around 19.00 hours when I came back  to the university.

President Barack Obama’s home country is Kenya, says the First Lady

April 5, 2010

Michelle Obama says Kenya is Barack Obama’s home country. This should be interesting for the constitutionalists.

Jesus for Communists, Zionists and Lawyers

April 4, 2010
Jesus for Communists, Zionists and Lawyers
By Dick Eastman
And he opened his mouth, and taught them, saying,
Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
Blessed are they that mourn: for they shall be comforted.
Blessed are the meek: for they shall inherit the earth. More

Possibly Canada’s biggest ‘Watergate’ scandal you’ve never heard about

April 3, 2010

Stephen Harper

Nine (9) dead judges in Canada…and you’ve never heard about it in the mainstream media. But if you have heard about the “water war crimes” through the mainstream media, it has been grossly distorted. Check out the following report which claims to be the real deal in investigating Canada’s water war crimes.

Thousands of viewers worldwide are now turning to the WaterWarCrimes web site to learn about the statistically impossible co-incidence of the sudden deaths of nine (9) Canadian judges linked to the WaterWarCrimes lawsuit in Canada’s Federal Court plus the sudden death by heart attack in January 2009, of a prominent Canadian politician and the sudden death by heart attack, in February 2010, of a retired prominent Canadian civil servant, both linked to the WaterWarCrimes.  The total death count is now eleven and set to go higher.

For decades, political and business insiders, with Canadian and British Columbian governments, have known that the water resources in the American southwest and Mexico were dwindling in the face of an increasing population. A small group of Canadian political insiders saw the opportunity to earn massive profits for themselves from the export of Canada’s fresh water and set about on a fraudulent and corrupt scheme to capture for themselves an illegal water export monopoly so they could line their pockets with revenues from the sale of Canadian public assests and gouge American consumers.

You can keep up to date here. The water war crimes site recently notes the strange resignation of Canadian Deputy Minister of Justice John H. Sims.

Vatican sex scandal likened to persecution of the Jews

April 2, 2010

Fr. Raniero Cantalamessa, Preacher to the Papal Household

I’m afraid many visitors to my site don’t have the time to view the links. So, on this Good Friday I’d like to post a short essay by Catholic scholar Michael Hoffman.  His timely analysis of the current child molestation scandal in the Catholic church won’t be found in the main stream or most religious media, but it should be.  Because much of the Catholic church has been infiltrated by Masonic Zionism (even church interiors), Hoffman declares that Pope Benedict is not a Catholic.

Vatican compares molestation scandal to “persecution of the Jews”

This would be hilarious if it were not so depraved and disgusting. The crypto-rabbi wing of Judeo-Churchianity (Rev. Fr. Cantalamessa, Pope Benedict) trying to curry favor, on Good Friday, with the rabbis of the Judeo wing, compare the uproar over the culture of child-molestation facilitation in the Catholic hierarchy (Mahony, Driscoll, Skylstad still in power; Bernard Law, fugitive from justice, made Arch Priest of a Roman basilica) with the “persecution of the Jews.”

Here we have prima facie evidence that Cantalamessa and his enabler, Pope Benedict, are not Catholic. “Persecution of the Jews” is the historic cry of the Freemasons and rabbis against the saints and theologians of the early and medieval Church.

To claim that worldwide anger over child molestation facilitation by the hierarchy of the Catholic Church is comparable to unjust “persecution of the Jews” is self-indicting. To make this claim on Good Friday is blasphemy. It signifies that the current usurpers who occupy the Church are as phony as the paranoid and megalomaniac ADL that sees “persecution of the Jews” in every stubbed Zionist toe.

Moreover, what is the definition of “persecution of the Jews”? Is it “persecution” when freedom of speech is in place to permit educating the public concerning the murderous racism in the Talmud that inspires Israeli mass murder in Palestine? Is it “persecution” when the stories of execution gas chambers in Auschwitz are questioned by scientists and publishers? Is it “persecution” when Israeli generals are compared to Nazis when they butcher the people of Gaza?

As for “collective” punishment, what of the collective punishment of German civilians during and after World War II? What of the ongoing collective punishment of the populations of Lebanon and Palestine by the “state of Israel,” egged on by homicidal maniacs known as Orthodox “settler” rabbis?

If the Vatican was truly Catholic and Christ-like it would announce to the world that every child-molestation facilitator, beginning with Cardinal Roger Mahony in Los Angeles, has been removed from office and shipped to a Trappist monastery while they await state prosecution — with the Vatican fully cooperating with the prosecutors. Bernard Law would be extradited from Vatican City back to Boston to face justice. Instead, the Vatican continues to keep these and other evil bishops (Skylstad, Driscoll, ad nauseum) in power while the Vatican sobs about “exaggerated” charges of a culture of child molestation facilitation existing within the Church.

The Vatican is the enemy of the Catholicism of the early and medieval Church, and thus today it appears without shame, on Good Friday, like Martin Gray, author of For Those I Loved, a book filled with his sorrowful ordeal as a persecuted Judaic “Holocaust Survivor” who was supposedly forced to help clear bodies out of the Treblinka “gas chamber.” In truth, Gray and his book were both fakes. In fact, he was a decorated officer in the Soviet NKVD responsible for the murder of Christians and gentiles, posing as a poor persecuted Chosen One. This is the pattern of despicable fraud and shetl chicanery which the pope and his papal household preacher, sunk in the ethos of Holocaustianity, mount as an alibi and imitate as a form of self-defense.

Alas, the rabbinic racketeers will never surrender their monopoly on persecution to the hated papacy, even when the “Holy See” is occupied by a co-conspirator who is so inept he imagines he can grab a share of the persecution paranoia and co-opt Judaism’s most cherished, trademarked brand. Consequently this disgraceful Vatican pandering to the ideological heirs of those who demanded the death of Jesus, is now backfiring.

In a palimpsest of falsification, the Zionist media keeps the pressure on Benedict by portraying this agent of the Synagogue as quasi antisemitic. This ruse serves a two-fold function: 1. it keeps Benedict pandering ever more to the rabbis, offering ever more craven concessions and servile compromise; and 2. it gives the 39-watt filaments of the Remnant newspaper types in traditional Catholicism the opportunity to claim that poor, pitiful Pope Benedict is a Catholic bastion against the synagogue! (Somewhere the masters of the Zohar are grinning).

For those who own a copy of my book Judaism Discovered, you will find a dossier on the lies and deceitful word games played by the crypto-rabbi “preacher of the papal household,” Raniero Cantalamessa. Cf. pp. 389-390 and 414-418.

In the pages mentioned above, Mr. Hoffman points out two boldface lies made by Fr. Cantalamessa who tries to defend the Talmud’s vulgar references to Jesus:

(1) that the Sadducees were more guilty of deicide than the Pharisees, and (2) that Pilate was ‘just as responsible as the Jewish leaders.’

%d bloggers like this: