Canada’s Terror Patsies, John Nuttall and Amanda Korody’s guilty verdict overturned by Judge

July 31, 2016

Source: Copied from RadicalPress

Friday, July 29, 2016

BREAKING NEWS: Canada’s Terror Patsies, John Nuttall and Amanda Korody’s guilty verdict overturned by Judge

John Nuttall and Amanda Korody
after hearing verdict today
“The world has enough terrorists…we do not need the police to create more.”
BC Supreme Court Justice Catherine Bruce

In what Vancouver Sun reporter Ian Mulgrew describes as a stunning decision, the Judge in the Canadian Terror Patsies trial today ruled that the pair were entrapped by the RCMP. She overruled last year’s jury “guilty” decision and ruled that the police themselves broke the criminal code and if the guilty verdict were left to stand, it would obstruct justice. Well, that’s about as clear a verdict as can be stated by a judge. But it’s not good enough for the Crown and the police. They’re going to appeal. But looking at the verdict from their POV…what other choice do they have? If they don’t appeal, and win the appeal, the government’s going to get its @$$es sued off by the couple for entrapment, false charges and imprisonment.

johnnuttall

Here is the CTV news report on the verdict and I will have some more comments to follow:

“VANCOUVER — A British Columbia couple found guilty of terrorism charges have had their verdicts tossed out in a scathing court decision that flays the RCMP for its “egregious” conduct in manipulating naive suspects into carrying out a police-manufactured crime.
B.C. Supreme Court Justice Catherine Bruce said the Mounties used trickery, deceit and veiled threats to engineer the terrorist acts for which John Nuttall and Amanda Korody were arrested on Canada Day three years ago.
The couple believed they were planting pressure-cooker bombs to kill and maim crowds gathered to celebrate at the B.C. legislature.
“The world has enough terrorists. We do not need the police to create more,” Bruce said in a landmark ruling Friday as she characterized the RCMP’s methods as “multi-faceted and systematic manipulation.”
“There is clearly a need to curtail the actions of police … to ensure that future undercover investigations do not follow the same path.”
Bruce said Mounties involved in a months-long sting launched in early 2013 knowingly exploited Nuttall and Korody’s vulnerabilities to induce them to commit an offence.
She described the pair as marginalized, socially isolated, former heroin addicts dependent on methadone and welfare to subsist and said they were “all talk and no action.”
Nuttall and Korody were recent converts to Islam. Their trial heard Nuttall say in a recording that he wanted to kill and maim countless people during Canada Day festivities in retaliation for Canada’s role in the mistreatment of Muslims in Afghanistan and other countries.
Without the heavy-handed involvement of undercover officers, it would have been impossible for Nuttall and Korody to articulate, craft and execute a terrorist bomb plot, Bruce said.
“Ultimately, their role in carrying out the plan was minuscule compared to what the police had to do,” Bruce said. “It was the police who were the leaders of the plot.”
She also condemned the behaviour of the primary undercover officer who, at the direction of the operation’s overseers, discouraged Nuttall and Korody from seeking outside spiritual guidance and convinced them he was a member of a powerful international terrorist group that would likely kill them if they failed to follow through.
“He was their leader and they were his disciples,” said Bruce, who stayed the proceedings, which threw out the convictions and allowed the couple to walk free after more than three years behind bars.

They embraced outside B.C. Supreme Court before being temporarily re-arrested and later released from provincial court under a peace bond, which places them under strict conditions for up to a year.
A jury found the pair guilty in June 2015 of terrorism-related charges but Bruce delayed registering the convictions at the request of defence lawyers, who wanted to argue the Mounties had entrapped their clients.
The stay of proceedings means the charges won’t appear on any criminal record and can’t be used against the couple in the future. Had they been convicted, Nuttall and Korody could have faced a maximum sentence of life in prison.
Nuttall’s mother, Maureen Smith, was in court for the ruling and pumped her fist in the air when Bruce ordered a stay of proceedings.
Smith said she was ecstatic about the verdict but still furious at the RCMP.
“It makes me so angry that the cops did that to my son and Amanda,” she said. “The police were dirty crooks for committing these crimes against people, especially marginalized ones.”
Outside court, Crown lawyer Peter Eccles said he was disappointed by the decision and emphasized that the couple still pose a threat to the public.
“Let’s face it, they did do it,” Eccles said about Nuttall and Korody planting the inert explosives. “And they meant it.”
The Crown has filed an appeal of the ruling issued Friday.
Marilyn Sandford, Nuttall’s lawyer, referenced a section of the judge’s ruling, which described the RCMP’s perception of the risk posed by her client as “farcical.”
“We don’t criminalize thought in our country,” Sandford said. “We don’t criminalize crazy ideas. There are a lot of people with crazy ideas who are not inclined to act on them.”
Korody’s lawyer, Mark Jette, described the ruling as a “powerful indictment” against the RCMP and said the next step will be helping the couple re-integrate into society.
Jette rejected the suggestion that the public should be concerned about the ruling hamstringing police from investigating terrorism threats.
This is the first time in Canada that the legal defence of entrapment has been successfully argued in a terrorism case. Three previous attempts failed.”

 

This is not over…as John Nuttall himself stated outside the courtroom after the verdict. He said he and Amanda Korody just want to go away and live their lives and have children. But he’s afraid to walk the streets of Canada…afraid the police will frame him again and/or take any children he and Amanda have. He says he can’t live in this country anymore.

I would say that John’s fears are well-founded. The police (and the police officers’ handlers…CSIS) cannot let this verdict stand. Not only will it bring lawsuits by the victimized couple for entrapment and imprisonment, etc…as I said before…but the RCMP and CSIS are in deep doo doo with the international cabal. They were supposed to get a conviction, which would serve as a precedent in the further corruption of the justice system in Canada….and lay the groundwork for more entrapment of vulnerable patsies and more terror plots/false flags for the international terror grist mill they’re setting up.

This Canadian legal precedent can be applied internationally and is a major setback for Terror Inc. The mistake the perpetrators of the entrapment scheme made was that they needed a corrupt judge to go along with the corrupt police officers and CSIS agents. The Canadian judicial system just isn’t far enough along in terms of corrupt judges….and hasn’t kept up with the corruption of the police departments.

And speaking of justice. Kudos to Supreme Court Justice Catherine Bruce…a true Canadian heroine if ever there was one! Hopefully she can now retire in peace. She saved the integrity of the Canadian judicial system…for now at least.

—-

Comments

  1. What else can one expect from an organization which is totally corrupt. Abolish the RCMP, time to start over. They set the whole thing up. Where are the charges against the so called officers? They manufactured a crime with lies and bullshit – The people involved are nothing more than a pathetic bunch of losers.

  2. I have followed this hoax set up since the get go and am thrilled at how the Judge responded. Hmm…. he DID have a career at one time?……… One must wonder what her repercussions will be.

    Meanwhile, these two folks may never find peace.

    But, hey! A gay Syrian is Grand Martial of the Pride Parade so…. forget these losers and their burden and shake your booty! Canada has its priorities straight, hmm… er…. hetero?

  3. and I’m not referring to those who were falsely charged. You, the police who did this are indeed scum…or perhaps twas a few of those CSIS morons running around playing secret nutter… What-in-the-hell were you idiots thinking!?
    Where are the charges? How high up the chain does this actually go? Straight to the top no doubt. Pathetic. It is indeed time for a revolution – a proper one.

  4. Hi Noor. The judge was a madame justice I believe. So nice to see the pigs exposed in their pen. 🙂

  5. Probably goes right to the top Jim. I.e. Tel Aviv.

  6. JFK was correct, apparently.

  7. BREAKING: Terrorist Cell Exposed As Canadian Government Operation
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sx-jtSgT5bw


Church Quiz

July 31, 2016

I’m working on a short quiz or questionnaire that you can use to ascertain your church’s belief with regard to Christian Zionism. You can publish your results here, even anonymously, to let others know how your church rates.

In the meantime, you can click here and find out if you are a true “Christian” or a “Christian Zionist.”


How some evangelicals are challenging support for Israel’s government

July 29, 2016

Article first appeared here at The Washington Post on December 14, 2015

From left to right: Lynne Hybels, Todd Deatherage, Lisa Gungor and Shauna Niequist walk in Jerusalem in March 2015. (Photo by Christine Anderson)

JERUSALEM — Lynne Hybels is revered for her work helping the impoverished around the world, but some people view her as dangerous.

Hybels, cofounder with her husband of one of the nation’s largest churches, has been called a heretic and an anti-Semite for her efforts to build bridges between Palestinians and Israelis in the Middle East.

Hybels is among a small number of influential evangelicals who are challenging a decades-long stance of blanket evangelical support for Israel’s government. They are taking trips to the Middle East, not only to visit biblical sites but to engage with modern-day Palestinians and Israelis in conversations centered more around modern politics than ancient texts. They are organizing conferences and writing publicly in an attempt to discern a new role for Christians in bringing an end to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Gradually, their ideas are taking hold, especially with young evangelicals.

READ MORE HERE.


PokeMon exposed by ex-Satanist

July 28, 2016


Nova Scotia Court of Appeal rules in favour of Trinity Western University’s law program

July 28, 2016

HALIFAX: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF.ca) expressed its satisfaction with the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal decision released earlier today in Trinity Western University v. Nova Scotia Barristers’ Society.  The Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the Supreme Court, which had ruled against the Barristers Society’s refusal to accredit Trinity Western University’s law school.

The law societies of B.C., Ontario and Nova Scotia have ruled against recognizing the law program of Trinity Western University (TWU), a private Evangelical Christian university in Langley, B.C.  The Federation of Law Societies of Canada has approved the law program of TWU as meeting academic and professional standards.  The Barristers’ Society does not allege that there is anything wrong with TWU’s law program, but claims that TWU’s Community Covenant discriminates against the LGBTQ+ community.  The Community Covenant prohibits numerous legal activities such as vulgar or obscene language, drunkenness, viewing pornography, gossip, and sexual activity outside of the marriage of one man and one woman.

The Justice Centre previously intervened in this case at the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in December of 2014, to argue for the Charter section 2(d) right to freedom of association, including the right of every charity, ethnic and cultural association, sports club, temple, church, and political group to establish its own rules and membership requirements.  On January 28, 2015, Justice James Campbell of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia ruled against the Barristers’ Society, stating that “The Charter is not a blueprint for moral conformity. Its purpose is to protect the citizen from the power of the state, not to enforce compliance by citizens or private institutions with the moral judgments of the state.”

“The court’s decision is a victory for freedom of association, freedom of conscience and religion, and freedom of expression,” said Justice Centre president John Carpay. “All Canadians must be free to peacefully associate with one another under common beliefs and values, without punishment, and this court today upheld those freedoms.”

For more information, contact:

John Carpay, president, Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms:
403-619-8014 or jcarpay@jccf.ca

Jay Cameron, staff lawyer, Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms
403-909-3404 or jcameron@jccf.ca

Read Court Documents and Case Background 


Jewish Terrorism and the Creation of the State of Israel

July 28, 2016

Source: Full document here.

Abstract
Laffiteau, Charles A.

“Jewish Terrorism and the Creation of the State of Israel

Since the destruction of Israel appears to be a shared goal of Palestinian and Islamic terrorist groups, an examination of the role Jewish terrorism played in the creation and expansion of the state of Israel as one of the causal explanations for the current use of terrorism by Palestinian and Islamic terrorist groups is also warranted. Terrorism was used by adherents of the Jewish religion many centuries before it was ever used by Christians, Muslim and other types of religious extremists. Therefore, the focus of this essay will be on literature that analyzes and discusses the case of Jewish terrorist groups, such as the Irgun and the Stern Group, and the role played by Jewish Zionist terrorism in the creation of the state of Israel as well as in expanding Israel’s borders since 1948. The paucity of literature about the history of Jewish Zionist terrorism, as compared to the wealth of recent literature focused on Islamic terrorism, also shows that much more research is needed on all different types of religiously inspired violent terrorism.


God of the (Christian) New Testament Bible

July 27, 2016

Love your enemies.

But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back. Then your reward will be great, and you will be children of the Most High, because he is kind to the ungrateful and wicked. Luke 6:35 (NIV)

 


%d bloggers like this: