Wikileaks: Israeli scam against Americans?

November 29, 2010

WIKILEAKS, A TOUCH OF ASSANGE AND THE STENCH OF AIPAC

“Recent admissions that the Israeli lobby, AIPAC, routinely receives masses of classified information makes them suspect #1 for being the source of Wikileaks”

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Wikileaks is like a TV show that never gets off the ground.  We started with a “shoot ‘em up” in Iraq, the helicopter slaughter soon forgotten and move on to, well, what?  We got a deluge of material from Afghanistan, carefully gleaned to point fingers at Pakistan.  When it came down to backing any of it up, it went nowhere.

Considering the massive corruption and drug scandals, even the revelations that President Karzai has been in negotiations with pranksters pretending to be the Talbian, all the really juicy stuff from Afghanistan must have been in another drawer. Then we got Iraq.  Ah, Iraq.  There, we could check.  We know the people who wrote the leaked material.  They told us Wikileaks edited it, altered it, redacted it more than the Pentagon.

The “Iraq War Log” was, well…phony. There is one thing that has been consistent about Wikileaks and our prediction is that this next batch, reputed to be millions of highly sensitive documents, will prove our point. Wikileaks is Israel.

Wikileaks is an intelligence operation to weaken and undermine the American government, orchestrated from Tel Aviv, using dozens of operatives, dual citizens, some at the highest authority levels, spies for Israel.   Through leaking carefully selected intelligence along with proven falsified documents, all fed to a controlled press, fully complicit, Wikileaks is, in fact, an act of war against the United States.

HOW CAN ISRAEL SIFT THROUGH DEFENSE DOCUMENTS?

This last week, in a lawsuit over an AIPAC, (Israel’s lobby) employee reputedly fired for being caught spying against the US, news stories across the United States reported that, as part of that $20 million civil case, evidence will be presented that masses of classified material come to AIPAC and Israel continually.  Is AIPAC Wikileaks? The only evidence of any massive leak discovered in the Pentagon is AIPAC.  Last week’s Washington Post story was buried quicker than a carp in a playground: Jeff Stein, at the Washinton Post, reports the following:

Rosen says his actions were common practice at the organization. He said his next move is to show that AIPAC, Washington’s major pro-Israeli lobbying group by far, regularly traffics in sensitive U.S. government information, especially material related to the Middle East. “I will introduce documentary evidence that AIPAC approved of the receipt of classified information,” he said by e-mail. “Most instances of actual receipt are hard to document, because orally received information rarely comes with classified stamps on it nor record’s alerts that the information is classified.”

But Rosen said he would produce “statements of AIPAC employees to the FBI, internal documents, deposition statements, public statements and other evidence showing that [the] receipt of classified information by employees other than [himself] … was condoned … for months prior to being condemned in March 2005 after threats from the prosecutors.”

How does this apply to Wikileaks?  The answer, if we bother to put the pieces together, is staring us in the face.  The proof, the ultimate proof, however, will be in the current batch of documents that have already been prepared, weeks of work by dozens with access to classified documents, and only one group has that access and can operate with impunity, as was shown in a recent story in Veterans Today:

AIPAC is a sham.  The group has, over the years, destroyed anyone who has tried to have it named what it really is, a dangerous foreign lobby and nest of spies.  AIPAC is the most feared organization in Washington and most powerful, above any law.  A former employee of AIPAC, Steve Rosen, who AIPAC claims was a spy, more appropriately a “caught” spy, now claims his former employer does nothing but spy. Rosen stands to get $20 million in his defamation lawsuit against AIPAC.

He isn’t without motive but we have also learned that Rosen has considerable documentation of AIPAC receiving and disseminating classified information, received from, well, we have to call them traitors, inside the US government. We know that a vast spy ring operates in Washington and that Israel is the center of it.

We also know that Israel, Turkey, India, Pakistan, China and Russia trade American secrets back and forth like baseball cards.  We know that AIPAC is deeply involved in this spying. We know that AIPAC claims to hold signed letters of unconditional support from 80% of the members of congress, all of whom received campaign contributions arranged by AIPAC, with many elections financed almost entirely by AIPAC, a group involved, according to the Washington Post and Steve Rosen, in spying on the United States with seeming complicity by the FBI itself.

WHAT DO WE LOOK FOR, HOW CAN WE PROVE ISRAEL OR AIPAC MAY BE BEHIND WIKILEAKS?

Were we to ask author Jeff Gates, he would point to the “storytelling” aspect of Wikileaks, Assange and his “on again-off again” rape charges or that someone that manages to make it to continual television interviews can’t be found by police or security services. We call this “storytelling” and Jeff Gates tells us that Israel, the power behind Hollywood and the American press, is the “storyteller” of all time.

There are better ways to “prove,” a word as subjective as any of the storytelling around the Wikileaks myth itself.  The proof, always depending on who accepts the proof, and as is almost always the case, dependent on whether the press itself chooses to report it, which if Israel is involved, is more than a bit predictable itself. Lack of reporting potential Israeli complicity in Wikileaks, knowing AIPAC and Israel have the longest history of accessing classified information and, by far, the strongest agenda for leaking information, could be seen as conclusive proof itself.

WHAT WILL BE IN WIKILEAKS?

If dual citizens who make up much of the Pentagon’s leadership are working with Israel or AIPAC to formulate Wikileaks, as seems to be the case, then the upcoming leak will serve a pro-Israeli agenda, even if it damages the United States, as other Wikileaks have.  These are Israeli agenda items:

  • Discrediting Obama foreign policy in order to weaken the president’s influence with congress to push for a halt on new settlements in Palestine and the forced removal of Islamic property owners.
  • Accusations involving Turkey, now feuding with Israel over the killing of Turkish citizens on the Mavi Marmara, now recognized as a purely humanitarian mission.  These accusations against Turkey may include weapons being supplied to terrorists in Iraq, a fanciful abuse of reality.  What will not be reported, if this story is “leaked” either through Wikileaks or the other Israeli sources, “Debka”..”Stratfor”..”FamilySecurityMatters.org”..or the infamous “IsraelNationalNews.com” is Israel’s 40 years of complicity in the very acts they now accuse Turkey of.
  • More importantly, is the issue of blaming Turkey for the actions of the terrorist group, PKK, long funded by Israel and now claimed to be allied to Al Qaeda, is vital to Israel’s strategy against Turkey.
  • Expect Pakistan to be hit, as usual.  An Islamic nuclear power with a top rate million man army that outclasses Israel hands down, Pakistan, primary competitor for US aid dollars, a country that actually has agreements with the United States and real troops fighting alongside Americans, will get their usual Wikileaks bashing.

WIKILEAKS IS CHICKENFEED MEANT TO COVER ISRAEL’S TAIL

Is it a coincidence that documents regarding Israel, their spying, influence peddling, suspicions of complicity  in terrorism, Yemen, Iraq, Pakistan, Somalia, across Europe and even the Detroit bombing, those reports are there, they are classified but you will never see one on Wikileaks.  In fact, they are the only classified information that never gets out to the news.  Is that because, as we have learned, the borders of Israel extend well into Washington DC, well into the Pentagon?  What won’t we see in Wikileaks:

  • Nothing in Wikileaks will accuse anyone, even Pakistan or Afghanistan, or complicity in narcotics trafficking nor mention the huge new narcotics industry operating in Iraq.  Ask yourself why.
  • One of the biggest areas of complaint in the Pentagon, more classified White Papers have been written on this than anything else:  “How Israel is Endangering the United States
  • In fact, the biggest “classified” debate in America is what supporting Israel, a nation with incredible wealth and utterly obnoxious leaders costs the United States.  Rumors of such issues aren’t rumors at all.  When General Petraeus presented his now famous power-point presentation to Admiral Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, outlining how Israel is undermining American foreign policy, he wasn’t operating without tens of thousands of pages of intelligence behind him.  Not one page, not one word of these studies will be in Wikileaks.
  • When Vice President Joe Biden said the following to Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu:    

“This is starting to get dangerous for us, what you’re doing here undermines the security of our troops who are fighting in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. That endangers us and it endangers regional peace.”

Are we to believe these statements were taken out of thin air?  In fact, Petraeus, Mullen and Biden are only the tip of the iceberg.  Admiral Mullen, America’s top military leader under the Commander in Chief, has repeatedly cited Israel and America’s relationship, as, not only a liability but something far worse, so much worse that:

As public statements by Admiral Mullen, Vice President Biden, General Petraeus and others, citing America’s relationship with Israel as a military disaster, are obviously “watered down” for public consumption, can you imagine what classified reports are saying?

WHY PRESIDENT OBAMA IS AFRAID AND WHY AMERICA IS PARALYZED

The greatest fear any president has, even more than impeachment, is the fate of Jimmie Carter.  Carter, now pegged as an “Antisemite” and “enemy of the state” in Israel, is still being sold to Americans as something quite the opposite of reality.  Friends in Israel, if they want to start a row, something not too difficult in Israel as you might guess, will walk around carrying one of Jimmie Carter’s books under their arm.  A Yasser Arafat t-shirt and suicide vest are considered only marginally worse. Carter left office under mysterious circumstances.  Several disasters, high interest rates, the hostage crisis and the failed rescue attempt showed signs of conspiratorial meddling.  His real crimes were:

  • Pushing Israel for a durable and lasting Middle East peace
  • Monetary policies that kept America out of debt…
  • Support of Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid
  • Unwillingness to engage in military adventure

When the defense and oil lobby joined with Israel and Wall Street to crush the Carter presidency, the writing was on the wall.  Interest rates, the “October surprise” and the military sabotaging the hostage rescue attempt, these things destroyed President Carter who might, otherwise, have suffered an “accident” like the Kennedy brothers.  Today, millions of Americans who should be praying to return to Carters foreign policy and fiscal conservatism, are taught to look on him as a failure.  However, more and more, historians are seeing Carter as the last American president.  Every leader since has been dictated to by Israel.

Advertisements

Should Christians pray for war criminals?

November 26, 2010

200 ISRAELI WAR CRIMINALS BETTER HOPE FOR PALESTINIAN AMNESTY

Wednesday, November 24, 2010 at 9:17AM Gilad Atzmon

A few days ago, British Chief of  Defence Staff General Sir David Richards admitted that victory in Afghanistan is unachievable.  “In conventional war,” said Richards, “defeat and victory is very clear cut and is symbolised by troops marching into another nation’s capital.”

It took a few years for British military elites to admit that the war in Afghanistan cannot lead anywhere : a valuable lesson to learn from mid to late 20th century warfare, is that conventional military might cannot easily defeat mass civilian resistance.

It is interesting to reflect too, that the Jewish state has exercised a ‘strategy’ of occupation for sixty two years — and for some reason the penny has still failed to drop. The Israelis are still convinced that they can manage to knock down the resilient Palestinians using siege, indiscriminate  killing, carpet bombardment and chemical warfare.

The results are pretty obvious: and bearing in mind that Israel considers itself to be a ‘Jews only democracy’, then every Jewish Israeli is complicit in a colossal war crime against a civilian population.

But it goes further: more and more Israeli soldiers of all ranks are directly involved in an endless list of crimes — some stop pregnant women from receiving urgent medical attention , while others drop bombs on populated neighbourhoods. Some use children as human shields, while a few perform executions of peace activists. And others just feed the cannons with white phosphorus shells.

The perpetrators of these crimes are actually subject to universal jurisdiction laws. They can be detained everywhere around the world. They may end their life in jail.

A few brave Israelis must be very concerned with the moral condition of their state, because a few days ago, a document identifying 200 Israeli soldiers suspected of war crimes leaked out of Israel. It made it to the internet. The list included the names, ranks, military posts, pictures and addresses.

The people who leaked the information and put  it on the net stated that the names that followed were “the direct perpetrators, agents for the state of Israel that in Dec.- Jan. 2008- 2009 attacked scores of people in the besieged Gaza. The people listed… held positions of command at the time of the attack therefore not only did they perform on behalf of a murderous state mechanism but actively encouraged other people to do the same. They bear a distinctive personal responsibility. They range from low-level field commanders to the highest echelons of the Israeli army. All took an active and direct role in the offensive.”

On the 17th I was quick to refer to the story: I posted a link to the Israeli War Criminal site on my writing page.  On the 18th, I  was falsely accused  by the Israeli News Channel (Channel 10) and a few other Israeli blogs as being the man behind the publication of the names and the faces.

Needless to mention that this fact didn’t make me overwhelmingly popular in Israel. My email box looked like an Israeli war zone, and one of my recent youtube clips that was screened by the Israeli TV soon became a platform for Israeli vile ugliness.

It all reminded me why I had denounced my Jewishness and left Israel. It rang a bell. It reminded  me why I decided years ago never to step foot in that doomed place ever again — The Israelis were desperate and angry. They needed someone to blame. And after all, ‘blaming someone’ is far easier than admitting that something is systematically and categorically wrong at home.

On the 19th, the Israeli news channel managed to get hold of me : They were trying to trace the whistle blower. I obviously couldn’t help them; nor would I like to help them.  As far as I am aware, no one knows who the people behind the publication of the list are. Though initially the Israelis claimed that the list was fabricated and included many names that had nothing to do with the crimes in Gaza (2008-9), the Israeli media soon admitted that the list was leaked from an IDF source and was probably genuine.

I tried to point out to the Israeli Channel 10 researcher that the publication of the list is the best thing that has happened to Israel for years : The list is a clear signal for Israeli future combatants. It is there to suggest to them that non-ethical conduct may bear some heavy and direct consequences. Such a recognition is vital for Israelis so they can start to amend their path  and find a way to live in peace with their neighbours.

One may also find it strange that in the so called ‘only democracy in the Middle East’, a list of 200 suspected war criminals is leaked — and the entire media is chasing a whistle blower instead of engaging with the real story. It shows clearly a society that is rapidly drifting away from any form of recognition of international law, let alone ethical awareness.

However, I know very well why the Israelis are so furious — People around the world do not realise that for Israelis, the Jewish state is nothing but a prison. As much as the Israelis claim to love their state, there is nothing they love more than leaving it behind, and I guess that the Israelis are starting to grasp the true meaning of the de- legitimisation of their state :  It is now reaching a point of no return, and  it has become personal, because the people on the list will have to think twice before they set foot on a plane.

Interestingly, the people who published the list used a tactic that was used by Jewish and Zionist institutes  after WWII : Instead of chasing leaders and military commanders, the Nazi hunters had collated information about ordinary people — the low ranking officers, the soldiers, the guards; those ordinary people who had perpetrated crimes against humanity.

This tactic proved to be effective in incriminating generations of Europeans as vile anti-Semites.  After the war, European guilt was quickly translated into Zionist power.

Clearly, the people behind the Israeli War Criminal list leak are letting Israel taste its own medicine : By listing 200 soldiers of all ranks, the message is clear — the Israeli society itself is deeply ill. It is not just the people at the top, it is actually  the very ordinary ones. Rather than Israel — it is actually the ‘Israeli’.  The malaise seems to be deeply imbued in the society and its culture.

In the case of Germany and other European nations, it was Israel and Jewish leaders who were given the choice of whether they wanted to forgive, or withhold forgiveness.  It was the Israelis and Jews who, tentatively and conditionally, have given European nations a kosher amnesty.

I guess the fate of Israel is similar — Yet now it is the Palestinians and only the Palestinians who can save the Israelis from  themselves and their brutality.  It is only the Palestinians who are entitled to pardon Israeli criminals.  The more crimes Israel commits in the present — the more Israelis are dependent on Palestinian’s future kindness.

Once the Truth and Reconciliation Commission for Israeli war crimes is founded in Palestine, it will be the Palestinian people who decide who to pardon.


How Christians allow Israel to commit atrocities

November 25, 2010

“ISRAEL-FIRST” THEOLOGY ALLOWS ISRAEL
TO COMMIT ANY ATROCITY

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/israelfirstthelogy_allowsisraeltocommitm.htm

By Rev. Ted Pike
18 Nov 10

Today most evangelical Christians remain silent after more than 60 years of Israeli injustice and brutality against Palestinians. Many praise Israel more enthusiastically than ever! This includes the millions who fanatically follow Zionist pastor John Hagee. Is there any Israeli outrage (maybe starting nuclear war?) that could cause evangelicals to disapprove of the Jewish state? Shockingly, no. The dominant theology of evangelicals today—Calvinism—leads Christians to the belief that we must not “curse” God’s chosen people with criticism, no matter what they do.

Such incredible, unscriptural forbearance is rooted in centuries of a Calvinist heresy described as antinomianism. Most Christians don’t know what this concept is. They should, because they are probably under its heretical influence. This false theological premise endangers true Christianity itself and, through support of Israel, also endangers the Mideast and the whole world.

In Greek, “anti” means against and “nomos” means law. Antinomianism means “against law.” Historically, antinomianism was an early cult of Christianity. Theologically, this concept says God’s grace alone saves His elect whether they are obedient or not. The two most outstanding examples today are Calvinism, teaching a person once saved is always saved, and Christian Zionism, with its doctrine that Christ-rejecting Jews still receive God’s blessing and right to occupy a land dedicated to holiness. Christian Zionism is a direct product of Calvinism. It gives the Jewish nation the same immunity from moral judgment that the “sinning saint” enjoys.

To most people, such pseudo-theology is patently unjust. Concerning salvation, it sentences one unsaved adulterer to the torments of hell forever yet rewards another adulterer with eternal bliss simply because he once accepted Christ as His Savior. How has this dogma persuaded so many? It appeals to many believers because it seems to exalt God. It says Christ’s sovereignty must be absolute. Thus, He arbitrarily selects whom to save and to damn. Having elected a few to salvation and most to perdition, Christ chooses for each a fate no one can escape despite their “choices,” which are not really viable, since, according to Calvinism, there is no free will. If we know we have been chosen by God (through a genuine “born-again” experience), then we cannot escape our destiny for heaven. God will have us there, practically whether we like it or not. His grace is irresistible, say Calvinists. No sin committed by the truly “born-again” can separate God’s “elect” from salvation. The harshest punishment will be a lesser reward in paradise.

Calvinists misquote Romans 8:39, “Nothing shall separate us from the love of God.” Actually it says, “No created thing shall separate us, etc.” If there is one thing Scripture teaches, it is that sin is something we create and it surely does separate us eternally from our Maker! There is one loophole: If an ostensibly born-again believer’s sins become outrageously evil, Calvinists proclaim he was never really saved in the first place.

Yet, rather than such a hypocrite deserving full blame, it is Calvinism itself which is most culpable because it excused his sin from the beginning. The one who sins becomes the slave of sin, resulting in iniquity that escalates out of control.

Sin is not properly defined as every error or weakness of being human. It is conscious rebellion against the known will of God. Dismissing this correct definition, Calvinism trivializes sin for the believer, describing “occasional” sin as a normal, everyday occurrence. In supposedly upholding Christ’s power, it thus opens a barn door of antinomian license to sin that stimulates the very wickedness that our own decisions, Christ’s power, and right doctrine are more than able to prevent.

A True Concept of God’s Sovereignty

Calvinism, with its image of Divine coercionoverriding the free will of man, chooses a very human, fleshly way to exalt Christ. People have been in awe of dictators like Hitler, Mussolini and Stalin for the same brute force.

It is actually Christ’s incredible, self-sacrificing love, a moral virtue, that inspires true worship. He denied Himself and His infinite status and power to be born in a cow barn, suffer and die to ransom us from sin. In astonishing love, He calls us to voluntarily become His family forever.

Correct thinking about Christ’s sovereignty produces joy, love and incentive to reject evil. It transforms our hearts through trust in Christ’s shed blood so we hate to displease Him. We are Christ’s spiritual bride. We adore Him, the great Lover of our souls, and thus joyfully give Him our whole lives. We know that daily fulfilling His requirement of trust and obedience to the best of our ability is not unreasonable. In the simplicity of childlike trust, we find “the peace that passes understanding” (Phil. 4:7). If we rebel and reject His love, we know He has every right to reject and punish us eternally.

Christ, in His sovereign foreknowledge, already knows who will freely humble themselves to be saved. He arranges circumstances to bring that person to salvation. This is true election or predestination: Christ saving us as we cooperate with our free wills. It is a salvation responding to the enormity of His self-denying love for us—a magnitude of kindness that makes us want to become His love slaves forever. Such deliverance is through His initiative alone; and, although our free wills cooperate, we have nothing of which to boast.

How Zionism Flies On Calvinist Wings

True thinking about God’s sovereignty creates a just view of salvation based on individual response to God, and it also creates a just and righteous view of Israel. It assures us that righteous descendants of Abraham—true Jews who do the works of their father Abraham—will someday inherit the Promised Land. But it makes no room for blind endorsement of a racial covenant. It gives evil Jews no privilege to dispossess and abuse Palestinians simply because Jews are “God’s chosen people,” just as Christians have no right to go to heaven while sinning.

The antinomian errors of Calvinist theology may seem complex, but the way they empower the establishment of Israel is simple. A hundred years ago, western Christian leaders believed (as they still do) that Jews possess divine privileges as the original “covenant” people with God. Just as sin can’t separate the once saved Christian from heaven, so Jewish sin can’t nullify their unconditional right to Palestine! Abraham’s covenant, said evangelicals, did not promise heaven to the wicked Jew, but it did promise Palestine. It did promise special protection from the “curse” of criticism.

Do you think errors in Christian doctrine don’t matter? This ancient doctrinal misconception about the nature of God’s sovereignty, compounded from St. Augustine to Calvin to Hagee, gives frightening license to Israel to do absolutely anything it wants! This has led to geopolitical ramifications for the whole world and to grave moral compromise for the church.

As Israel is clearly mocking attempts at Mideast peace and covertly encouraging even more expulsions of Arabs, we may see further massacre of Palestinians (as happened in 1948) so Israel can “ethnically cleanse” Palestine, rebuild its Jewish temple, and ultimately receive its messiah. But theological insanity will continue to forbid Calvinist believers from ever criticizing and opposing Israel—unless Christians rediscover true doctrine about the conditional terms of salvation and of Jewish occupation of Palestine. Without such revival, evangelicals’ silence will continue, even when they look into the cold gun barrels of a Zionist firing squad.


New definitions: anti-Semitism, cyber-hate, diversity, genocide, holocaust, racists

November 25, 2010

Introductory comments by Arthur Topham, Publisher of Radical Press:

Dear Reader,

Whether one is a Christian or not the duplicitous Orwellian definitions which Rev. Ted Pike explains in this article are of inestimable valuable to free thinkers and essential to a greater understanding of just how the Rothschild/B’nai Brith International (i.e. Anti-Defamation League, aka ADL) Zionist/Jewish/Israeli mindset operates and functions in their relentless pursuit of greater and greater draconian laws aimed at protecting their own nefarious, racist, supremacist agenda while at the same time surreptitiously destroying the legitimate infrastructure of Western civilization.

Here in Canada their cunning, serpentine actions over decades have resulted in the malicious manipulation of our “Human Rights” laws; laws ostensible meant to benefit the whole of society yet, upon realistic examination in light of all the ensuing legal battles over the past thirty years or more, now proven to be the height of deception and fraud perpetrated against the vast majority of Canadian citizens.

The battle for freedom of speech in Canada is clearly a battle for the right of anyone, be they Christian, Atheist, Pagan, Secular or whatever, to not be brainwashed into the current Zionist-induced mindset and remain free to criticize the actions of the Israeli state and/or the motivations of those Zionist Ashkenazi “Jews” controlling it to bend the mind of humanity toward their one-sided, psychopathic delusion that they, and only they, are the sole inheritors of the right to do whatever they damn well want while the rest of the world rolls over and allows them to destroy all that humankind has fashioned over the past two millennia that’s worthy and dignified in a spiritual, political or cultural sense.

Canada’s greatest challenge today is to enlighten the zombie-like attitudes of all those Canadians who’ve been so mind-controlled through the Zionist media and the education system over the past 60+ years that they truly believe supporting Israel and the Zionist agenda is a good thing for this nation.

Ted Pike’s novel idea of a dictionary is one way in which they can be debriefed of this seditious mental aberration; one that perpetuates the illusion of being good and honest people while in truth hindering their own freedom and the freedom of all Canadians to express their God-given, essential right to open opinion and criticism of any ideology that threatens the well being of our country.

Please pass this reference material on to as many people as you can and don’t forget to …

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com

 

ADL’S TWISTED HATE CRIMES DEFINITIONS: A DICTIONARY

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/adlstwistedhatedefinitionsdictionary.htm

By Rev. Ted Pike
24 Nov 10

Yellow plastic arches looming above streets from Taiwan to Tripoli mean McDonald’s USA. In the same way, identical terms in hate laws throughout the Western world are the logo of their architect: the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. ADL recently boasted of having masterminded the whole idea of hate laws, particularly in America.

ADL was privileged to lead a broad coalition of civil rights, religious, educational, professional, law-enforcement, and civic organizations that worked in support of the HCPA [Hate Crimes Prevention Act] for more than a decade. A pioneer in advocating for hate crimes legislation, the League published its first model hate crimes statute almost 30 years ago. Forty-five states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws based on or similar to the ADL model. (“ADL Welcomes First Indictments under Federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act,” adl.org)

Hate laws set up Christians and free thinkers for prosecution, making free speech into hate speech. To understand and combat hate laws, lovers of freedom must be able to recognize the twisted terms that show up in all hate crime educational materials and legislation. Virtually none mean what they suggest or promise. They are cleverly contrived to disempower Western majority populations’ Christian values; to fragment society into separate groups with different legal privileges and punishments; and to silence critical speech about sexual morality and minority religions. In short, there is no legislative tool more powerfully equipped to destroy Christian civilization today.

Here is a concise dictionary of the devious “doublespeak” ADL weaves into hate laws worldwide.

Affirmative Action – Unequal rights and advantages in employment and education given to ethnic minorities and women as a result of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Ostensibly meant to right historical wrongs, affirmative action undermines Christian society by moving it away from laws for individuals to laws for groups. It says people are deserving because of the class they belong to, not what they do. This inherently discriminatory principle continues to drive “civil rights” legislation today, especially in favor of blacks, Latinos, and women.

Anti-Semitism – To ADL, this term is not limited to belief that Jews are evil or deserve to die. It refers to: mere criticism of matters Jewish, including Jewish dominance of big media (See, Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish), finance, and Congress; criticism of Israel; questioning the accuracy of the six-million figure of Holocaust Jewish dead; agreement with the New Testament claim that Jews masterminded the crucifixion of Christ; quotation of unflattering statements by Jews.

Attack on Israel – Any strong criticism, even if constructive or well-intentioned, of the Jewish state.

Bias (includes Bigotry and Prejudice) – Negative attitudes—primarily rooted in Biblical values—that are critical of homosexuality, Judaism, Islam, abortion, political liberalism, and other anti-Christian establishments that ADL believes it is wrong to oppose.

Bias-Motivated Crime (Hate Crime) – Any violation of US law motivated by a politically incorrect bias such as “homophobia;” such a crime deserves triple penalties compared to the same crime committed for a random or more personal reason. (In many countries mere public criticism of federally protected groups is also a hate crime.)

Blood Charge – The “anti-Semitic” New Testament statement that Jewish leaders masterminded and the Jewish population demanded the crucifixion of Christ. This is defined as the seminal cause of anti-Semitism over the past 2,000 years, leading to the Holocaust. It is defined as a source of continuous “anti-Semitism” and “irrational hatred” of Jews by Christians, making Christian countries inherently unsafe, violence-prone, irrational and racist.

Bullying – Criticism of homosexuality, Judaism, Jews or Israel, Islam, or minorities (other than whites or Christians) on campus, especially when it causes emotional discomfort to students who are part of such groups. Cyber-bullying – The same, only online.

Censorship – Attempts by Christian parents and leadership groups to restrain ADL/liberal promotion of homosexuality, pornography, sex education and secularist “respect for diversity” in public schools. (This term, of course, does not refer to ADL’s right to silence any form of Christian speech or of criticism of Israel on campus or online.)

Civility – ADL-suggested restraint in public criticism of President Obama and Democrats in Congress.

Civil Rights – Special rights and privileges in employment and housing given to blacks, Jews, Muslims, Hispanics, homosexuals/transgenders and women—not afforded to white, straight males or anyone with politically incorrect “biases.”

Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Basis for all US federal hate crimes legislation. Exalts certain favored groups above majority. Opens door for yet more classes to acquire such preference.

Conspirators — Millions of Americans, particularly Tea Party activists, who are intent on defeating Pres. Obama’s agenda and unseating Democrats in government through vehement criticism. (See, ADL Blasts ‘Paranoid’ Right)

Cyber Hate — Criticism of matters Jewish or of Israel online; quoting Bible passages against homosexuality online; distributing photographic evidence of abortion procedures online; etc.

Delegitimization of Israel – “Anti-Semitic” Biblical claim that God abhors occupation of His Holy Land by a nation of disobedient Jews (See, Israel: On the Way to Empire in the Mideast); “terrorist” claim that Israel acquired most of Palestine through violent theft and expropriation of 800,000 Arabs to concentrations camps; demand that dispossessed Palestinians be allowed to return and reoccupy stolen lands; statement that Israel at present is a racist and fundamentally unjust state which should be dismantled and replaced by a state equally participated in by Jews, Muslims, and Christians, all of whom are beneficiaries of its Abrahamic legacy.

Domestic (homegrown) Terrorists – (According to ADL/SPLC’s MIAC directives to police) Not just Muslim saboteurs but U.S. “anti-government” protesters, including supporters of Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin, members of the Constitution Party, “militia” activists, “white supremacists,” proponents of a Constitutional Convention, “militant” opponents of abortion, and opponents of illegal immigration and the New World Order, NAFTA, federalization of the states, restrictive gun laws, and confiscatory taxation. (Infowars.com, “Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, Libertarians are Terrorists”)

Discrimination – In public schools, criticism of homosexuality, Judaism and Israel, Islam, etc. In business, refusal to hire a known homosexual or firing him or her because of their sexual activity. In housing, refusal to sell or rent to any of the above.

Diversity – Participation in a non-Christian sexual behavior or religion. Membership in a sexual, ethnic or religious group outside the white Christian majority. Respect for diversity — Acceptance of such divergent groups or lifestyles, particularly of homosexuality.

Equality (as promised in hate crimes bills) – Special rights and privileges for Jews, blacks, Latinos, women and homosexuals, with no such rights implied for the majority.

Gender Identity — The sex one perceives oneself to be, regardless of designated sex at birth; this gender identity should be respected by society and determines where a person should go to the bathroom, whom they can marry, and how they should be treated. If a person’s biological gender is different from their gender identity, society is responsible to ignore it.

Genocide – In a Jewish context, genocide can happen through delegitimization of the Jewish state and also through Christian conversion of Jews which kills Jewish souls.

Hate – Bias or criticism against specially protected groups.

Hate Crimes Statistics — Reports by police of alleged hate crimes, the great majority of which have never been adjudicated in court, most consisting of altercations and name-calling yet considered actual hate crimes by police and government and used as proof of an “epidemic of hate” in America and the world.

Hate Speech — Speech critical of protected groups, which should not be protected under the First Amendment; a form of psychological abuse of a persecuted community which government must end, even at the cost of others’ freedom.

Harassment (Intimidation) – Public criticism of protected groups (especially in government and public education); even if not accompanied by any threat of physical violence, such criticism of historically oppressed groups creates feelings of fear and intimidation and therefore must be outlawed and ended.

Hate-free environment – Public spaces, especially college campuses, where criticism of protected groups is not tolerated; in these spaces, it is unacceptable to speak against abortion (thus traumatizing post-abortive women), minority religions (upsetting their adherents), homosexuality (causing “mental anguish” to homosexuals), or other “historically marginalized” groups. The consciences, religious beliefs, and free speech of the white, Christian majority are not as important as the freedom from hurt feelings (and the lurking threat of violence) for minorities. Eventually, all of society should be a “hate-free environment.”

Holocaust – The indisputable fact that six million Jews were killed during World War II. Any questioning of this fact is evil and defames the memory of Jewish dead. Such Holocaust denial is an “anti-Semitic” hate crime worthy of loss of freedom and civil rights, deportation and imprisonment for more than six years.

Homophobia — Criticism of homosexuality.

Perceived Gender or Ethnicity – How others view you, regardless of how you view yourself, in regard to gender or ethnicity. Even if the bias-motivated attacker incorrectly perceives the victim’s gender or ethnicity, he must be punished as a hate criminal with triple penalties. The real crime is having biased thoughts.

Persecution of Jews – Vicious, primarily Christianity-incited verbal, social, and physical attacks on Jews for nearly 2,000 years, the ultimate hate crime.

Proselytization – Christian attempts through evangelism to destroy Jewish souls and cultural/ethnic identity. Successful proselytization leads to belief in the false prophet Jesus.

Racial profiling – Consideration by police (resulting in action) of the fact that members of certain specially protected groups (such as blacks) have a much higher rate of crime per capita than the majority population or may be illegal aliens (Latinos).

Racial Quotas – Government requirements that businesses, education institutions, government agencies, etc., prefer members of favored groups with hiring and admissions advantages, fulfilling prescribed numbers.

Racists — Individuals, particularly in white Christian culture, who advocate the superiority of white Christian civilization and morality. Zionism and the State of Israel, however, reflecting the exalted ethics of Judaism, do not exemplify such bigotry.

Religion (As Protected by Hate Laws) – Judaism and Islam, as minority religions in America, are protected while Christianity, a historically overgrown and persecutive religion, is not.

Sexual Orientation – Homosexuality and sexual deviancies which merit special hate crimes protection. Heterosexuality, preferred by the majority, is granted no protection.

Stereotypes – Broad, negative descriptions of blacks, Jews, Latinos, homosexuals or Judaism and Islam. It is permitted, however, for ADL to make sweeping negative generalizations against critics of Israel, portraying them as “anti-Semitic,” or against Christians, calling them homophobic, intolerant, bigoted, hateful, etc.

Tolerance – Non-criticism of Judaism, homosexuality or Islam.

Targeted Groups – Classes meriting special federal protection from verbal or physical “hate crime” attacks.

Transgender – A person who has had or merely intends biological sex change; anyone involved in gender-crossing or gender-bending requires special consideration by society and must be treated as a member of the gender with which they currently identify, regardless of whether it aligns with their biology or with their past or future gender identity.

Triple Penalties – The standard level of punishment merited by a hate crime under hate crimes law. Implication: A bias-motivated assault is three times as bad as a conventional assault.

Violent Radicalization — Becoming violent under influence of bias, particularly cyber-hate.

Xenophobia – Fear and mistrust, particularly by the white majority, of vastly disproportionate numbers of historically alien people which ADL encourages to settle in host countries, increasing “diversity” and diluting those cultures.

Zero Tolerance for Hate – Acceptance of free speech rights of homosexuals and religious minorities on campus but not for the rights of “homophobic” or Christian critics.

Summary

It is very clear that ADL hate laws—ostensibly meant to end bias—are themselves the epitome of bias. Virtually nothing ADL says, in public statements or the hate crimes legislation it writes, can be taken at face value. A manipulative, anti-Christian, anti-America agenda is always right below the surface. At this moment, the most glaring example of such duplicity is ADL’s bill HR 6216 which seeks to add “religion” to the protected classes in the Civil Rights Act. (See, ‘Don’t Criticize Jews and Muslims’ Bill Enters Congress)

In this bill, ADL has no intention of giving special rights and protection to all religions from bullying on tax-supported American campuses, but only to “harassed minorities:” Judaism and Islam. (We wish to point out that no religion should receive this twisted “protection” from criticism; we would oppose this legislation even if it gave special protection to Christians above the rights of atheists.)

Continue to protest this extremely dangerous legislation, now in the House Judiciary Committee. Come to Truthtellers.org Action Page for the names of the pivotal Republican committee members. Call them all with this message:

“Please oppose HR 6216, which would add “religion” to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It gives Jews and Muslims special protection from criticism on campus but doesn’t give such protection to Christians. This is more biased hate crimes legislation from the Anti-Defamation League to take away free speech and make Christians hate criminals.”


Christian Zionist prime minister mentally sound?

November 13, 2010

Harper on Israel: Is the Prime Minister mentally sound?

By Murray Dobbin

November 10, 2010

Watching and listening to Stephen Harper’s bizarre and unnerving speech about anti-Semitism and Israel raises the question as to whether or not the man is mentally fit to be prime minister.

In effect, Harper has taken the position of being Israel’s defender no matter what — in other words, this commitment comes before his duty as prime minister, before his duty to represent Canada’s interests abroad, before his role of elected representative. Harper is a defender of Israel no matter the consequences for Canada. He stated:

“[As] long as I am Prime Minister, whether it is at the United Nations, the Francophonie, or anywhere else, Canada will take that stand whatever the cost. I say this, not just because it is the right thing to do, but because history shows us, and the ideology of the anti-Israeli mob tell us all too well if we listen to it, that those who threaten the existence of the Jewish people are a threat to all of us.”

His dedication to that country supersedes his commitment to his own. That would be disturbing enough if Harper were merely a private citizen. But as prime minister it is beyond the pale and it isn’t much of a stretch to suggest it borders on the betrayal of Canada and certainly Canadian interests. For what does it mean that Harper will defend Israel no matter the consequences for Canada?

Harper referred in his speech to “the anti-Israeli mob.” I have to presume here that he is referring to all the Arab and Muslim countries which regularly criticize Israel at the UN. But, of course, not only them. UN resolutions criticizing Israel are regularly supported by virtually every country with the exception of Israel, the U.S. and — sometimes — El Salvador. Is the whole of the UN membership part of the “mob”?

Harper’s disturbing performance sends a clear message: Canada is prepared to sacrifice relations with all other countries if it has to defend Israel. Coming off the rejection of Canada for a Security Council seat, Harper deems determined to islate himself even more, and Canada along with him.

Harper’s speech was given to the Inter-Parliamentary Coalition for Combating Anti-Semitism an international pro-Zionist group whose sole task is to redefine anti-Semitism to mean virtually any criticism of Israel. It claims members from 40 countries and is holding its second conference — the first was held last year in London, England. The Canadian contingent is called the Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism (CPCCA).

// 

It is unofficial but had members from the four major Canadian federal parties until the Bloc members quit the organization last spring citing the “the inequality of opinions presented before the Coalition,” and “the refusal of the Steering Committee to hear groups with opposing viewpoints.”

Harper expressed the position of the organization perfectly — a position designed to counteract the global effort to de-legitimize the Israeli apartheid state. He said:

“Harnessing disparate anti-American, anti-Semitic and anti-Western ideologies, it targets the Jewish people by targeting the Jewish homeland, Israel…We must be relentless in exposing this new anti-Semitism for what it is.”

This declaration of the “new anti-Semitism” is pure hogwash and everyone stating it or using it to attack critics of Israel knows it. For one thing, thousands of North American and European Jews regularly attack Israel’s brutal treatment of the Palestinians in Gaza and West Bank. Of course, Zionists refer to these humanitarians as “Jew-hating Jews,” a clever bit of racist spin but far from the mark.

Israel’s flunkies have to come up with something to attack because the evidence is clear – actual incidents of anti-Semitism have been on the decline for years. Something had to be done to make it look otherwise. Harper claims anti-Semites, instead of actually targeting Jews here, attack them by criticizing Israel. The pretzel-like twisting of that argument is obvious. We are being asked to believe that thousands upon thousands of Canadian human rights activists are closet anti-Semites and have to limit their anti-Semitism to attacking Israel.

Like most of Israel’s hard-line supporters, Harper claims that no one is saying Israel can’t be criticized: “Israel, like any country, may be subjected to fair criticism,”

But in fact Harper is saying Israel cannot be criticized. He has had ample opportunity to make “fair criticism” but virtually never does. (The single instance I am aware of was a very mild rebuke over continued construction of Israeli settlements on the West Bank.) He has never mentioned the brutal assault on Gaza which killed over 1,200 civilians, called the wanton destruction of Lebanon “a measured response” and backs Israel in all of its patently phony “commitments” to negotiating peace while deliberately taking positions that no Palestinian leader could possibly agree to.

The Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism was originally going to issue a report last March. Then it was May. It was been delayed several more times and was supposed to be released at the meetings being held this week. It still hasn’t surfaced. On the organization’s website it still says “…we will be presenting a report of its findings in the late spring of 2010.” The group seems to have been inactive for sometime.

It was expected to call on the government to formally criminalize criticism of Israel. But perhaps its authors are beginning to realize that a document calling for the criminalization of free speech might not be the brightest idea they have ever come up with. Making a speech about the “new anti-Semitism” is one thing. Having it in a report, on permanent display for the whole world to see, is another. Personally, I hope they publish it. It might just be the last thing they do.


Letter to Christian Zionist, Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada

November 11, 2010

From: radical@radicalpress.com

Subject:     PM STEPHEN HARPER: CANADIAN TRAITOR AND ISRAEL’S “ANTI-SEMITIC” DRUMMER BOY by Arthur Topham November 11th, 2010

Date:          November 11, 2010 12:54:58 PM PST (CA)

To:       Harper.S@parl.gc.ca

Dear Stephen,

You are a traitor to the country of your birth. The shame that you are heaping upon Canada will ultimately reflect back upon yourself and all those associated with your heinous behaviour.

God help your perverse and damned soul.

Sincerely,

Arthur Topham

Publisher/Editor

The Radical Press

Canada‘s Radical News Network

“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

http://www.radicalpress.com

radical@radicalpress.com

——————————-

http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=1278

PM STEPHEN HARPER: CANADIAN TRAITOR AND ISRAEL’S “ANTI-SEMITIC” DRUMMER BOY

by Arthur Topham
November 11, 2010

As a dedicated patriot and nationalist there is absolutely no doubt left in my mind that Canada’s Prime Minister, Stephen Harper, is an abject traitor as well as a full-blown slave to the racist, supremacist state of Israel.

Harper’s recent public pronouncements, voiced to an unofficial, international group of pro-Zionist parliamentarians in Ottawa that included the self-described “Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism” (CPCCA), all of whom had gathered together within the hallowed halls of Canada’s parliament buildings to conspire further upon “new” strategies which might further the aims and ideology of the Zionist state of Israel, was the last straw for me in terms of holding out any hope that the Conservative Party of Canada would, and could, stand firm for traditional Canadian values, morals and principles of democratic government.

The concept and God-given right of freedom of speech, which has dominated the digital and print world of Canadian politics for a number of years now, forcing all sincere, freedom-loving Canadians to take a hard, second look at their supposed Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in light of a number of Canadian Human Rights Act’s, Sec. 13(1) cases brought forth by both federal and provincial “Human Rights” commissions, has now been unequivocally caste down, gauntlet-like, before the electorate by the seditious sophistry and deception emanating forth from the mouth of PM Stephen Harper.

The Emperor of Ottawa has finally shed his serpentine sheep’s clothing and now stands naked before the nation as a stark, fervent and rabid representative of the Israeli Zionist criminal cabal.

In light of the recurrent, historic ploy by the Israeli Zionists to re-invent the age-old wheel of “anti-Semitic” deception this latest overt and provocative support for Israel by Canada’s chief political CEO bares a striking resemblance to and repetition of the prophetic words and warnings of the late British journalist and writer Douglas Reed who, in his classic 1956 work on Israel and its ideology of political Zionism, The Controversy of Zion, describes clearly the very same methodologies now being recycled by the Harper government and the  “Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism” in order to deceive the Canadian public and delete from its mass perception the true motives of Israeli domestic and foreign policies.

As stated in an original article on this unsavory decoy subject of “anti-Semitism,” B’nai Brith: Beating the anti-Semitic Drum, first published September 5, 2005 then updated in 2008 after I and my website RadicalPress.com were charged with a Sec. 13(1) “hate crime” of “anti-Semitism” by Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, as far back as WWII the Zionist forces were already secretly infiltrating foreign governments, especially those of the USA and Canada, with the expressed intent of subverting them to Israeli interests.

In Chapter 43 of Reed’s book, ominously and aptly titled “The Invasion of America”, he describes to a tee the very same techniques presently being re-applied by Harper and the “Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism” to discredit and criminalize any person, group, organization or publishing business that exposes the fundamental truth about the real structure, intent and purpose of this nefarious ideology and its present embodiment within the Israeli state.

As Reed then described the modus operandi of the Zionists:

“While military invasions and counter-invasions multiplied during the six years of the Second War, absorbing all thought and energy of the masses locked in combat, a silent invasion went on which produced more momentous effects than the armed ones. This was the political invasion of the American Republic [and Canada. A.T.] and its success was shown by the shape of American state policy at the war’s end….This was a three-pronged movement which aimed at the capture of the three vital points of a state’s defences: state policy at the top level, the civil services at the middle level and “public opinion” or the mass-mind at the base.”

This is a precise and apt description of what is presently being, once again, surreptitiously foisted upon the Canadian public by the likes of PM Harper and his band of disloyal insurgents who have managed, with the assistance of foreign Israeli lobbyists like the secret Jewish masonic order of B’nai Brith, the Canadian Jewish Congress, the Simon Wiesenthal Center and other blatant Israeli-first traitors such as former federal Liberal Attorney General Irwin Cotler (brain-child of the “new anti-Semitism” catch phrase). All of them are hell-bent on using this former thread-bare Zionist trump card, “anti-Semitism”, to censor authentic debate and criticism and stifle freedom of speech when it comes to the shameful and despicably cold-blooded and cruel actions of the racist, supremacist Israeli government.

We need only look at the obvious actions and make up of our federal and provincial politicians and political parties; of our federal judiciary or Supreme Court of Canada (composed for the most part of pro-Zionist Jews); of our various civil organizations and “Human Rights” commissions and tribunals; and of our so-called mainstream media which is overwhelmingly controlled by pro-Israel, Zionist corporate interests, to see that this relentless “invasion” of our nation’s political and cultural infrastructure and mindset has now reached the apex in its rise to infamy and police state mentality and behaviour.

Further to this in-your-face dictatorial stance of Harper and his Israeli con-men advisers, Reed had more prescient observations to make which apply to the present circus act and siren song of the Zionist forces now occupying our federal and provincial levels of government and our msm. Thanks to the Zionist media’s overwhelming control and presence in our everyday lives it was able, as Reed stated, to impose, “the law of heresy on the public debate in America. No criticism of Zionism or the world-government plan is allowed to pass without virulent attack; . . .”

Back as far as 1956 he was right on the mark in stating that “America has today a few surviving writers who fight on for independent debate and comment. They will discuss any public matter, in the light of traditional American policy and interest, save Zionism, which hardly any of them will touch. I have discussed this with four of the leading ones, who all gave the same answer: it could not be done. The employed ones would lose their posts, if they made the attempt. The independent ones would find no publisher for their books because no reviewer would mention these, save with the epithets enumerated above.”

Regarding America’s B’nai Brith strong-arm for Israeli propaganda and the promotion of “hate crimes” legislation, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Reed stated:

“The A.D.L., of such small beginnings in 1913, in 1948 had a budget of three million dollars (it is only one of several Jewish organizations pursuing Zionist aims in America at a similar rate of expenditure). The Menorah Journal, discussing “Anti-Defamation Hysteria”, said, “Fighting anti-semitism has been built up into a big business, with annual budgets running into millions of dollars”. It said the object was “to continue beating the anti-semitic drum” and “to scare the pants off prospective contributors” in order to raise funds. It mentioned some of the methods used (”outright business blackmail; if you can’t afford to give $10,000 to this cause, you can take your business elsewhere”), and said American Jews were being “stampeded into a state of mass-hysteria by their self-styled defenders.””

I suggest that this very same ploy, originally designed to gain the support of American Jews who were disinterested in Zionism, is now being used against the Canadian public, with the help of the Zionist media, in order to muster up a similar state of “mass-hysteria” with regard to the “new anti-Semitism” presently being rammed down the collective throat and mind of Canadians across every spectrum by Harper and the “Canadian Parliamentary Coalition to Combat Anti-Semitism”.

A couple of final and important observations which Reed made regarding this endless aberration and ruse known as “anti-Semitism”.

Speaking of the inordinate power and influence of Zionist organizations like B’nai Brith International and its enforcement arm the ADL he quotes a Mr. Vincent Sheehan who, in 1949, wrote, “There is scarcely a voice in the United States that dares raise itself for the rights, any rights, of the Arabs; any slight criticism of the Zionist high command is immediately labeled as anti-semitic”. . .”

And, to state the obvious, underlying rationale for the behaviour of traitors like Stephen Harper, Irwin Cotler and all the rest of Canada’s pro-Israel political leaders:

“How is the oracle worked? By what means has America (and the entire West) been brought to the state that no public man aspires to office, or editor feels secure at his desk, until he has brought out his prayer-mat and prostrated himself to Zion? How have presidents and prime ministers been led to compete for the approval of this faction like bridesmaids for the bride’s bouquet? Why do leading men suffer themselves to be paraded at hundred-dollar-a-plate banquets for Zion, or to be herded on to Zionist platforms to receive “plaques” for services rendered?

“The power of money and the prospect of votes have demonstrably been potent lures, but in my judgment by far the strongest weapon is this power to control published information; to lay stress on what a faction wants and to exclude from it all that the faction dislikes, and so to be able to give any selected person a “good” or a “bad” press.”

The truth, regarding what is now happening here in Canada and elsewhere around the world, has never been more poignantly expressed than in these final two paragraphs of the late Douglas Reed. The collusion of Canada’s mainstream media with the Israeli government and the seditious motives of our political leaders have culminated in the insertion of the Trojan Horse of Zionism into Canada’s federal government and until this alien entity is expunged from Canada’s political, cultural and media milieu the fight to retain our rights to freedom of speech and expression will continue to widen and grow in intensity.

The death knell of this satanic, racist, supremacist and Nihilistic initiative on the part of Israel and its Zionist zealots and collaborators within our government to undermine Canada’s democratic principles and heritage must be rung loud and clear by each and every Canadian who values truth and freedom.

This cabal of Zionist cretins is anathema to our political and spiritual survival and, as such, PM Stephen Harper and his Conservative government must be removed from power as soon as possible and whatever government replaces them must not only defeat the Conservatives on the political battle field but, once victorious, formally arrest and try him and his accomplices for treason against Canada. Nothing short of such a radical move will prove efficacious in terms of ridding our nation of the clear and present danger that the state of Israel and the Zionist ideology pose to our God-given rights and freedoms.

—————

Arthur Topham is a writer and the Publisher and Editor of RadicalPress.com living in British Columbia, Canada. Like all alternative Internet news outlets not on the Zionist payroll he relies upon the good will and generosity of those in cyberspace for financial assistance to help him with his work. Any donations therefore would be most welcome. Please see the following url on the Home Page (upper right hand corner) http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=657 regarding donations. Also there is a “DONATE” button there for Paypal or here at https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=4466120Feel free to use any of them if you can help out. Thanks.

Arthur welcomes all feedback to his articles and can be reached at radical@radicalpress.com or via telephone at (250) 992-3479.

For the Full Monty on the sec. 13 complaint case involving RadicalPress.com and B’nai Brith Canada please see: http://www.radicalpress.com/?page_id=995


Why I Don’t Wear A Red Poppy On Remembrance Day

November 6, 2010

My father’s WWI service medals

If you were brave enough to click on this post, then please stay with me for a couple of minutes. Remember, I don’t make fun of people who wear red poppies. After all, my father was wounded for “king and country” in WWI and my namesake uncle perished in WWII. So I have solid reasons for wearing a poppy. But hear me out first before you condemn my personal action of not wearing a red poppy, an adornment  Robert Fisk calls “obscene fashion appendage – inspired by a pro-war poem.”

November 11 is Remembrance Day. In Canada it is a federal statutory holiday (except in the provinces of Nova Scotia, Ontario, Manitoba, Quebec, and three Territories). Wikipedia says it is

a Commonwealth holiday (observed in all Commonwealth countries except Mozambique) to commemorate the sacrifices of members of the armed forces and of civilians in times of war, specifically since the First World War. It is observed on 11 November to recall the end of World War I on that date in 1918 (major hostilities of World War I were formally ended “at the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month” of 1918 with the German signing of the Armistice).

Canadian Conrad Stoesz of the Mennonite religious persuasion writes why he doesn’t wear a red poppy. Instead, he wears a red pin made by Mennonite Central Committee that says, “To Remember is to Work for Peace.” He also promotes a website about conscientious objectors (COs).

Too often remembering is used to glorify war. When we speak of those who died in war, we often say “hero,” “buried with full military honours,” “he believed in the mission,” “died fighting for her country,” or “died for our freedom.” If we didn’t use such language, fewer would probably join the army. Remembrance Day services make me uneasy because they focus too much on those who died on “our side,” and, by implication, on God’s side. How often do we recall the larger picture – the loss of hopes and dreams, loss of innocence, psychological torment, and broken bodies regardless of allegiance? In WWII Canada lost some 45,000 soldiers. Germany lost 4 million soldiers and 2 million civilians. In total, more than 50 million people died as a result of the war.

Many people link their yearly commemoration of Canadian soldiers with support for current military missions. Take for example the classic and oft-cited Canadian poem, “In Flanders Fields.” Even though author John McCrae witnessed the horrific events of WWI, in part his poem is a call to continue the fight – to “take up our quarrel with the foe . . . ”

I believe it’s possible to acknowledge the sincerity of those who served but also question the use of force to achieve political goals. I grieve with the families who have lost loved ones but not in order to “take up our quarrel with the foe.” For me, the poppy carries too much of this baggage.

The Mennonite Brethren church stands firmly in the Anabaptist peace tradition. Our confession states, “We view violence in its many different forms as contradictory to the new nature of the Christian. We believe that the evil and inhumane nature of violence is contrary to the gospel of love and peace. In times of national conscription or war, we believe we are called to give alternative service where possible. Alleviating suffering, reducing strife, and promoting justice are ways of demonstrating Christ’s love.”

In WWII nearly 11,000 men of various backgrounds and faiths chose not to participate in violence but to serve in other ways. Mennonite Brethren leaders were instrumental in securing alternative options to carrying a gun designed to kill other humans. Over 7,500 of these COs were of Mennonite faith. The contribution they made was significant and still ongoing. It’s a part of Canadian history that needs attention in Canadian schools.

The CO story is vastly overshadowed. We are shelled everyday with images, stories, and glorification of war and violence. We need to hear our church’s viewpoint on this issue more than ever because the voices of the world are loud and penetrating with little thought of collateral damage.

U.S. president John F. Kennedy is quoted as saying, “War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today.” Even if J.F.K. is only half right, we whose history is rich in promotion of peace need to take every opportunity to tell the conscientious objector story for the good of our church and the world.

That’s why I don’t wear a poppy.

Is conscientious objector Conrad unpatriotic for not wearing a poppy? In my opinion, he is more patriotic than radical Christian Zionists who actually pray for war. If you like praying for war, here is a real war prayer: watch it.

Remembrance Day 2012
Nova Scotia, Canada

Much of the Remembrance Day celebration becomes somewhat of an industry.  Take for example the Royal Canadian Legion—an outfit that claims to remember the soldiers “who gave their lives that freedom might prevail.” ‘Donations’ are fixed retail prices if you want a red poppy or wreath at the Legion’s booth before Remembrance Day. But more than that, the Legion actually opposes freedom when it cuts into their profits. It claims to own the red war poppy and sues even war veterans who use it without the Legion’s “permission”. The Legion scoffs at the patriotic folks who wear the white peace poppy. For example, the Canadian Legion threatened to sue a distributor of white poppies! And the threats still continue. Did your loved ones die in the Great War for this kind of “freedom”? My father was shot in the head by a sniper and now I have to pay to wear a red war poppy? No thanks.

Did you know that those soldiers from Canada who died in WW2 were NOT Canadians?

Some of us wear red poppies today to remember the dead soldiers of World War I, but we are never taught to remember those who start wars and profit from them. You’ll be surprised and you ought to be outraged that our history books are merely propaganda by the “winners” of wars. Just a quick example about WWII: How many students know that Churchill’s great wartime speech “We shall fight them on the beaches” was given by a stand-in actor? Now, pick up the coffee mug you just dropped. Another mouth-dropper is the planned starvation of over 1 million German POWs, documented by Canadian historian, James Bacque, in Crimes and Mercies. We now know that Churchill was one of the greatest war criminals that ever lived, who “thrilled the uneducated masses” with his rhetoric and feasted on their cheers. Churchill mockingly admitted: “They cheered me as if I had given them a victory, instead of getting their houses bombed to bits.” Now award-winning British historian Peter Padfield exposes the big lie of WWII and confirms Churchill’s guilt. Read it if you dare. I get tired of hearing that our soldiers fought for our freedoms. The truth is, soldiers were duped by their own governments. And those behind the scenes were laughing all the way to their banks.

On Remembrance Day, let’s remember the greatest killing machine of all time: our own governments. Professor Richard Ebeling says in a review of Professor Rummel’s book Death by Government:

The megamurdering states of the 20th century have been: the U.S.S.R. (1917-1987), 61,911,000 [mostly Christian]; Communist China (1949-1987), 35,236,000; Nazi Germany (1933-1945), 20,946,000; and Nationalist (or Kuomintang) China (1928-1949), 10,076,000. These are followed by the “lesser” megamurdering states: Japan (1936-1945), 5,964,000; Cambodia (1975-1979), 2,035,000; Turkey (1909-1918), 1,883,000; Vietnam (1945-1987), 1,678,000; North Korea (1948-1987), 1,663,000; Poland (1945-1948), 1,585,000; Pakistan (1958-1987), 1,503,000; Mexico (1900-1920), 1,417,000; Yugoslavia (1944-1987), 1,072,000; Czarist Russia (1900-1917), 1,066,000.

I think rather than fighting over who wears a red or white poppy, we would benefit more from remembering the holocausts endured by other peoples: for example, the Cambodians, Ukrainians, Russians, the many nations of    Europe, Laotians, Chinese, Africans, Latin Americans, Armenians, and Native Indians of Canada.

The Noble Prize-winning Russian Christian and Gulag survivor, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn offered practical advice. After living through the horrors of the Zionist Bolshevik Revolution which tortured and murdered 62,00,000 Christians (double the population of Canada), he said those responsible for war should repent. Amen.

Canada, once known for its peacekeeping worldwide, is today an aggressive war-mongering nation like the USA. The pro-Zionists in Canada’s Parliament voted to allow Canada to lead the NATO-bombing of Libya to destabilize the richest country in Africa, while at the same time it has only 33 military personnel in peacekeeping activities. And not one word of protest came from the Canadian Legion or militant Christian Zionists. Does such hypocrisy alarm you?

Some things never change. Over 200 years ago, the Christian historian Edward Gibbon observed that “The courage of a soldier is found to be the cheapest and most common quality of human nature.” And, “[A]s long as mankind shall continue to bestow more liberal applause on their destroyers than on their benefactors, the thirst of military glory will ever be the vice of the most exalted characters.”

This is why, today, we continue to glorify killing in war by “honoring” “fallen heroes,” “who died for our country,” even in far away Afghanistan. And which is why, I too, do not wear a red poppy.


%d bloggers like this: