Tell the Truth and Shame the Devil

Breaking News (March 8, 2017): Amazon.com has just banned several thousand books, including this book by Hon. Gerard Menuhin. Amazon obviously wants to participate in the latest “fakenews” and prevent people from learning the truth. But the author has kindly provided a link and you can read it FREE. By the way, I just received my hardcopy of the book from UK before Amazon closed the door.

Francis Bacon said this about books: “Some books are to be tasted, others to be swallowed, and some few to be chewed and digested.”

“Chew and digest” this book by writer and novelist Gerard Menuhin, son of world renowned violinist Yehudi Menuhin.  menuhin-gerard-telltruthshamedevil-2nd-ed-feb2016

http://holocausthandbooks.com/dl/978-1-59148-141-6-TellTruthShameDevil-2nd-LowRes.pdf

Gerard Menuhin tells you what the world’s media don’t want you to know. And if the elite have their way, you won’t be able to get it on the internet for very long. Educate yourself now while you have the opportunity.

2nd, expanded and corrected edition of 2016

Have you ever asked yourself why the world won’t come to rest?

Why your parents, grandparents or great-grandparents had to die in wars that never should have occurred in the first place?

Well, this book holds the answer…

Publisher’s Note

We have spent a lot of time with the author to identify and properly document all the sources he quotes. In that process, several corrections and deletions occurred, and the author added a number of passages to the book. As a side effect, we created an extensive bibliography listing all the works cited, and we added a name index, so readers can quickly find persons quoted or discussed in the book. All in all, this is a greatly improved edition, and we are offering it at an extremely competitive list price, because, as the author put it, “telling the truth is not a business, it’s a public service.”

This book is of monumental importance for the people of the world today. Many know that something is not right in the world. Nations engage in perpetual war while bankers and armaments makers line their pockets from the carnage. The average citizen of the world has been cut out of the decision-making process of government, whether he lives in a democracy, republic, theocracy or dictatorship. All the while, the ruling elite grow stronger and richer, as the real producers struggle to survive. Behind the scenes, events are controlled by a coterie of ethnic puppet masters who work their marionettes in high places out of public view.

How did this world get to the dark place it is today? Who could have stopped it and what can we do today?

The book consists of four sections. The first section concerns Adolf Hitler, his character and intentions, and the real causes leading up to the outbreak of WWII, including the actions of the real culprits and the rejection of the great lie.

The second section enlarges on the activities of the real culprits, provides a historical overview of their progress, their nature, their power over finance and the media, and the methods by which they achieved it. It includes insights into Freemasonry, the European revolutions, the influence and control of education and foreign policy, the creation of the EU, the New World Order and the evolution of the plan through the same powers and their proxies, since the 17th century up to the present.

The third section concerns the First and Second World Wars (what the author refers to as “the Second Thirty Years War”), their conception, funding and inescapable continuity; current laws against freedom of expression, and the evolution of the Orwellian state; the importance of U.S. support for the Soviet Union throughout the Cold War, and Communism’s significance in the plan.

The fourth section identifies the true origins of the enemy, and Palestine’s occupation and its fate as examples of our common fate.

The text is interspersed with “Memos from Today,” that emphasize its relevance by citing current events. Hundreds of quotes are included from a wide range of authoritative sources, original and translated.

The last pages of this manuscript comprise conclusions and predictions. The narrative is dense and packed with facts, and backed by expert testimony. At times, the style is personal, even casual, and absolutely non-intellectual. It has been assumed that a personal touch makes the contents more accessible. The author is the son of the great American-born violinist Yehudi Menuhin, who, though from a long line of rabbinical ancestors, fiercely criticized the foreign policy of the state of Israel and its repression of the Palestinians in the Holy Land.

Menuhin says:

“I am simply Humanity’s spokesperson, a representative of our true rights. I have voiced in this book what many feel and a few know, but haven’t been able to express.”

World’s newest religion

World’s newest religion and its features:

“This new Jewish religion preaches revenge. It could well be the most sinister religion known to man, for in the name of Jewish suffering, it issues licences to kill, to flatten, to nuke, to annihilate, to loot, to ethnically cleanse.” Gilad Atzmon, The Wandering Who?, p. 149

No Jewish Exodus:

“[T]here was no forced exile of a Jewish people in the first or second centuries CE, and most critics are perfectly well aware that the Bible is not a book of history.” Israeli historian Shlomo Sand in The Invention of the Jewish People, p. 319

German Victims : How the Allied Victors of WWII tortured and killed their German prisoners (Part 1 of 2)

This terrifying article will make you ask the forbidden question:  
“Did the victors of WWII deserve to win?”

By Thomas Goodrich
author of  Hellstorm—The Death of Nazi Germany, 1944-1947

An edited abridgement by Lasha Darkmoon with notes and comments

“Staffed and run by Jews, the prisons were little better than torture chambers.”
— Thomas Goodrich

Part 1: Vai Victis! — Woe to the Vanquished!

Moments after arrival at the prison camp, prisoners were made horrifyingly aware of their fate. John Sack, himself a Jew, reports on one camp run by twenty-six-year-old Shlomo Morel.

“I was at Auschwitz,” Shlomo proclaimed, lying to the Germans but, even more, to himself, psyching himself up like a fighter the night of the championship, filling himself with hate for the Germans around him. “I was at Auschwitz for six long years, and I swore that if I got out, I’d pay all you Nazis back!”

Note by Lasha Darkmoon: Shlomo Morel, psychopathic torturer and killer of German prisoners of war, later took refuge in Israel where he was held in high honor and remained beyond the reach of international law. Here now is this Jewish war criminal in 1945, age 26, commandant of a German prisoner of war camp where torture was practiced for its own sake:  

“Schweine!” Shlomo cried. He threw down his rubber club, grabbed a wooden stool, and started beating a German’s head. Without thinking, the man raised his arms, and Shlomo, enraged that the man would try to evade his just punishment, cried, “Sonofawhore!” and slammed the stool against the man’s chest.

The man dropped his arms, and Shlomo started hitting his now undefended head when snap! the leg of the stool split off. Cursing the German birchwood, he grabbed another stool and hit the German with that.

No one was singing now, but Shlomo, shouting, didn’t notice.

The other guards called out, “Blond!” “Black!” “Short!” “Tall!” and as each of these terrified people came up, they wielded their clubs upon him. The brawl went on till eleven o’clock, when the sweat-drenched invaders cried, “Pigs! We will fix you up!” and left the Germans alone.

Some were quite fixed. Shlomo and his subordinates had killed them

The next night it was more of the same . . . and the next night . . .  and the next and the next. Those who survived the “welcoming committees” at this and other camps were flung back into their pens.

And so, with the once mighty German Army now disarmed and enslaved in May, 1945, and with their leaders either dead or awaiting trial for so-called “war crimes,” the old men, women and children who remained in the dismembered Reich found themselves utterly at the mercy of the victors.

Unfortunately for these survivors, never in the history of the world was mercy in shorter supply.

§

Because their knowledge of the language and culture was superb, most of the intelligence officers accompanying US and British forces into the Reich after WWII were Jewish refugees who had fled Germany in the late 1930s. Although their American and English “aides” were hardly better, the fact that many of these people became interrogators, examiners and screeners, with old scores to settle, insured that no German would be shown any mercy.

One man opposed to the vengeance-minded program of these Americanized Jews was General George Patton.

“Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and [Bernard] Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working,” wrote the general in private. “I am frankly opposed to this war-criminal stuff. It is not cricket and it is Semitic. I can’t see how Americans can sink so low.”

Soon after occupation, all adult Germans were compelled to register at the nearest Allied headquarters and complete a lengthy questionnaire on their past activities. While many nervous citizens were detained then and there, most returned home, convinced that at long last the terrible ordeal was over. For millions, however, the trial had but begun.

Few German adults, Nazi or not, escaped the dreaded knock on the door. Far from being dangerous fascists, Freddy and Lali Horstmann were actually well-known anti-Nazis. Lali Horstmann records her encounter with a Russian commissar from the Russian Zone.

LD: Since a disproportionate number of Russian commissars were Jews, especially those working for the cheka and other security services, this particular officer was probably Jewish.

“I am sorry to bother you,” he began, “but I am simply carrying out my orders. Until when did you work for the Foreign Office?”

“Till 1933,” my husband answered.

“Then you need fear nothing,” Androff said. “We accuse you of nothing, but we want you to accompany us to the headquarters of the NKVD, the secret police, so that we can take down what you said in a protocol, and ask you a few questions about the working of the Foreign Office.”

We were stunned for a moment; then I started forward, asking if I could come along with them. “Impossible,” the interpreter smiled. My heart raced. Would Freddy answer satisfactorily? Could he stand the excitement? What sort of accommodation would they give him?

“Don’t worry, your husband has nothing to fear,” Androff continued. “He will have a heated room. Give him a blanket for the night, but quickly, we must leave.”

There was a feeling of sharp tension, putting the soldier on his guard, as though he were expecting an attack from one of us. I took first the soldier, then the interpreter, by their hands and begged them to be kind to Freddy, repeating myself in the bustle and scraping of feet that drowned my words.

There was a banging of doors. A cold wind blew in. I felt Freddy kiss me.

I never saw him again.

§

“We were wakened by the sound of tires screeching, engines stopping abruptly, orders yelled, general din, and a hammering on the window shutters. Then the intruders broke through the door, and we saw Americans with rifles who stood in front of our bed and shone lights at us. None of them spoke German, but their gestures said: ‘Get dressed, come with us immediately.’ This was my fourth arrest.”

So wrote Leni Riefenstahl, a talented young woman who was perhaps the world’s greatest film-maker.

Because her epic documentaries—Triumph of the Will and Olympia—seemed paeans to not only Germany, but National Socialism, and because of her close relationship with an admiring Adolf Hitler, Leni was of more than passing interest to the Allies. Though false rumors also hinted that the attractive, one-time actress was also a “mistress of the devil”—that she and Hitler were lovers.

“Neither my husband nor my mother nor any of my three assistants had ever joined the Nazi Party, nor had any of us been politically active,” said the confused young woman. “No charges had ever been filed against us, yet we were at the mercy of the Allies and had no legal protection of any kind.”

“We were never free from torments [in the American prison]. For hours on end I rolled about on my bed, trying to forget my surroundings, but it was impossible. The mentally disturbed woman kept screaming — all through the night. But even worse were the yells and shrieks of men from the courtyard, men who were being beaten, screaming like animals.”

Soon after Leni’s fourth arrest, came a fifth.

The jeep raced along the autobahns until, a few hours later, I was brought to the Salzburg Prison. There an elderly prison matron rudely pushed me into the cell, kicking me so hard that I fell to the ground. Then the door was locked. There were two other women in the dark, barren room, and one of them, on her knees, slid about the floor, jabbering confusedly; then she began to scream, her limbs writhing hysterically. She seemed to have lost her mind. The other woman crouched on her bunk, weeping to herself.

As Leni Riefelstahl (pictured) and others quickly discovered, the “softening up” process began soon after arrival at an Allied prison.

When Ernst von Salomon, his Jewish girl friend and fellow prisoners reached an American holding pen near Munich, the men were promptly led into a room and brutally beaten by military police.

With his teeth knocked out and blood spurting from his mouth, von Salomon moaned to a gum-chewing officer, “You are no gentlemen.” The remark brought only a roar of laughter from the attackers. “No, no, no!” the GIs grinned. “We are Mississippi boys!”

In another room, military policemen raped the women at will while leering soldiers watched from windows. After such savage treatment, the feelings of despair only intensified once the captives were crammed into cells.

“The people had been standing there for three days, waiting to be interrogated,” remembered a German physician ordered to treat prisoners in the Soviet Zone. “At the sight of us a pandemonium broke out which left me helpless. As far as I could gather, the usual senseless questions were being reiterated: Why were they there, and for how long? They had no water and hardly anything to eat. They wanted to be let out more often than once a day. A great many of them have dysentery so badly that they can no longer get up.”

“Young Poles made fun of us,” said a woman from her cell in the same zone. “They threw bricks through the windows, paper bags with sand, and skins of hares filled with excrement. We did not dare to move or offer resistance, but huddled together in the farthest corner, in order not to be hit, which could not always be avoided. . . . We were never free from torments.”

“For hours on end I rolled about on my bed, trying to forget my surroundings,” recalled Leni Riefenstahl, “but it was impossible. The mentally disturbed woman kept screaming—all through the night. But even worse were the yells and shrieks of men from the courtyard, men who were being beaten, screaming like animals. I subsequently found out that a company of SS men was being interrogated.

They came for me the next morning, and I was taken to a padded cell where I had to strip naked, and a woman examined every square inch of my body. Then I had to get dressed and go down to the courtyard, where many men were standing, apparently prisoners, and I was the only woman.

We had to line up before an American guard who spoke German. The prisoners stood to attention, so I tried to do the same, and then an American came who spoke fluent German. He pushed a few people together, then halted at the first in our line.

“Were you in the Party?”

The prisoner hesitated for a moment, then said, “Yes.” He was slugged in the face and spat blood.

The American went on to the next in line.

“Were you in the Party?”

The man hesitated.

“Yes or no?”

“Yes.”

And he too got punched so hard in the face that the blood ran out of his mouth. However, like the first man, he didn’t dare resist.

They didn’t even instinctively raise their hands to protect themselves. They did nothing. They put up with the blows like dogs.

The next man was asked: “Were you in the Party?”

Silence.

“Well?”

“No,” he yelled, so no punch.

From then on nobody admitted that he had been in the Party and I was not even asked.

As the above case illustrated, there often was no rhyme or reason to the examinations. All seemed designed to force from the victim what the inquisitor wanted to hear, whether true or false. Additionally, most such “interrogations” were structured to inflict as much pain and suffering as possible. One prisoner explained:

“The purpose of these interrogations is not to worm out of the people what they knew—which would be uninteresting anyway—but to extort from them special statements. The methods resorted to are extremely primitive. People are beaten up until they confess to having been members of the Nazi Party. The authorities simply assume that, basically, everybody has belonged to the Party. Many people die during and after these interrogations, while others, who admit at once their party membership, are treated more leniently.”

“A young commissar, who was a great hater of the Germans, cross-examined me,” said Gertrude Schulz. “When he put the question: ‘Frauenwerk [Women’s Labor Service]?’ I answered in the negative. Thereupon he became so enraged, that he beat me with a stick, until I was black and blue. I received about 15 blows … on my left upper arm, on my back and on my thigh. I collapsed and, as in the case of the first cross-examination, I had to sign the questionnaire.”

“Both officers who took our testimony were former German Jews,” reminisced a member of the women’s SS, Anna Fest. While vicious dogs snarled nearby, one of the officers screamed questions and accusations at Anna. If the answers were not those desired, “he kicked me in the back and the other hit me.”

They kept saying we must have been armed, have had pistols and so on. But we had no weapons, none of us. I had no pistol. I couldn’t say, just so they’d leave me in peace, ‘Yes, we had pistols.’ The same thing would happen to the next person to testify. The terrible thing was, the German men had to watch. That was a horrible, horrible experience. That must have been terrible for them. When I went outside, several of them stood there with tears running down their cheeks. What could they have done? They could do nothing.

Not surprisingly, with beatings, rape, torture, and death facing them, few victims failed to “confess” and most gladly inked their name to any scrap of paper shown them. Some, like Anna, tried to resist. Such recalcitrance was almost always of short duration, however. Generally, after enduring blackened eyes, broken bones, electric shock to breasts—or, in the case of men, smashed testicles—only those who died during torture failed to sign confessions.

Alone, surrounded by sadistic hate, utterly bereft of law, many victims understandably escaped by taking their own lives. Like tiny islands in a vast sea of evil, however, miracles did occur. As he limped painfully back to his prison cell, one Wehrmacht officer reflected on the insults, beatings, and tortures he had endured and contemplated suicide.

I could not see properly in the semi-darkness and missed my open cell door. A kick in the back and I was sprawling on the floor. As I raised myself I said to myself I could not, should not accept this humiliation. I sat on my bunk. I had hidden a razor blade that would serve to open my veins. Then I looked at the New Testament and found these words in the Gospel of St. John: “Without me ye can do nothing.”

Yes. You can mangle this poor body—I looked down at the running sores on my legs—but myself, my honor, God’s image that is in me, you cannot touch. This body is only a shell, not my real self. Without Him, without the Lord, my Lord, ye can do nothing. New strength seemed to rise in me.

I was pondering over what seemed to me a miracle when the heavy lock turned in the cell door. A very young American soldier came in, put his finger to his lips to warn me not to speak. “I saw it,” he said. “Here are baked potatoes.” He pulled the potatoes out of his pocket and gave them to me, and then went out, locking the door behind him.

§

Horrific as de-Nazification was in the British, French and, especially the American Zone, it was nothing compared to what took place in Poland, behind Soviet lines.

In hundreds of concentration camps sponsored by an apparatus called the “Office of State Security,” thousands of Germans—male and female, old and young, high and low, Nazi and non–Nazi, SS, Wehrmacht, Volkssturm, Hitler Youth, all—were rounded up and imprisoned.

While those with blond hair, blue eyes and handsome features were first to go, anyone who spoke German would do.

AMERICAN TORTURE PEN:

A forerunner of Abu Ghraib

“Staffed and run by Jews, with help from Poles, Czechs, Russians, and other concentration camp survivors, the prisons were little better than torture chambers where dying was a thing to be prolonged, not hastened.” — Thomas Goodrich

Source: Lasha Darkmoon

---

Galicia (Spain) Blocks Resolution against so-called “Holocaust”

By Adrian Gauss

Holocaust, Zionism & Judaica

March 29, 2013

Xosé Manuel Beiras

A resolution commemorating the victims of the Holocaust was vetoed by the spokesmen of party leaders in the northwestern Spanish province of Galicia. Before a resolution can be submitted to that regional parliament, a Council of Speakers must approve of it, and that’s where it was stonewalled by the spokesmen of the left-wing electoral coalition AGE (Alternativa Galega de Esquerda, Galician Left Alternative) and by the BNG (Bloque Nacionalista Galego, Galician Nationalist Block).

The event has reached a broader public by the Jewish propaganda outlet Jewish Telegraph Agency (JTA) in a press release on March 22 in an attempt to put both party spokespersons under pressure. They lamented that “party officials said they viewed Holocaust commemoration as part of Israeli propaganda.” (See also here for those able to read Spanish.

Xosé-Manuel Beiras, Professor of Economy at the University of Santiago de Compostela, is the leader of AGE (see top photo). Asked why he had rejected the resolution, he stated:

“We do not want to support a statement promoted by the State of Israel which is dyed in the wool of imperialism. We have repeatedly condemned the [Jewish] Holocaust but have never condemned any of the other [genocides].”

Mr. Beiras argues that Israel is NOT a democratic state and continues committing genocide against the Palestinian people. He added that Arab prisoners are tortured in Jewish prisons and “nobody says anything.”

To change their attitude toward the proposed resolution, parliamentarians demand that the genocides against other groups are mentioned in it as well, like the extermination of the Kurds, the Armenians, and the Palestinians themselves. The latter is being perpetrated by many more “state actors” than just the Israeli entity.

Yolanda Díaz, leader of “Esquerda Unida,” which is part of the electoral coalition AGE

The president of the Galician Association for Friendship with Israel, Pedro Gómez-Valadés, criticized the veto and the demands made to pass it, stating that the resolution was meant to be only about a certain event in history and is “unrelated to what happens today.” Gómez-Valadés is obviously either mendacious or utterly detached from reality, since it is self-evident that the abuse of the Jewish “Holocaust” is Zionism’s sword in its imperialistic endeavors and its shield against any criticism.

Just read what is written on one of the zillion websites promoting the eternal and isolationist commemoration of the “Holocaust,” here a German self-flagellation website:

“Some people even deny that the Holocaust happened. As time passes, and as we move further away from the Nazi period, we need to ask ourselves how best to communicate such events that still affect all of us.”

But have we Americans, or the Germans, or the Jews learned anything from this Jewish “Holocaust”? Apparently not, because they are all merrily engaged in the genocide against the Palestinians: the Zionists, Jews and gentiles among them, as the main actors, and the Americans and Germans as the main supporters and cheerleaders. Which proves that commemorating the Jewish “Holocaust” in isolation is actually furthering new genocides.

Although the Galician parliament did pass resolutions commemorating the victims of the Holocaust in the years 2010-2012 on occasions of the International Holocaust Remembrance Day (Jan. 27), this time the Galician Jews had to do without it. As Beiras said one time:

“Israel is a racist state insisting on the expropriation of territory and even – if possible – on the extermination of the Palestinian people.”

It looks like Galician politicians actually have morals and a spine. Let’s hope that they will not succumb to the pressure exerted by the non-existing powerful Jewish-Zionist lobby in coming months and years.

The Other Holocaust: 60 Million Christians Slaughtered and Forced Labor For Russian Clergy

Forced labor of Russian clergy by the Jewish Bolsheviks, 1919

More details here.

New definitions: anti-Semitism, cyber-hate, diversity, genocide, holocaust, racists

Introductory comments by Arthur Topham, Publisher of Radical Press:

Dear Reader,

Whether one is a Christian or not the duplicitous Orwellian definitions which Rev. Ted Pike explains in this article are of inestimable valuable to free thinkers and essential to a greater understanding of just how the Rothschild/B’nai Brith International (i.e. Anti-Defamation League, aka ADL) Zionist/Jewish/Israeli mindset operates and functions in their relentless pursuit of greater and greater draconian laws aimed at protecting their own nefarious, racist, supremacist agenda while at the same time surreptitiously destroying the legitimate infrastructure of Western civilization.

Here in Canada their cunning, serpentine actions over decades have resulted in the malicious manipulation of our “Human Rights” laws; laws ostensible meant to benefit the whole of society yet, upon realistic examination in light of all the ensuing legal battles over the past thirty years or more, now proven to be the height of deception and fraud perpetrated against the vast majority of Canadian citizens.

The battle for freedom of speech in Canada is clearly a battle for the right of anyone, be they Christian, Atheist, Pagan, Secular or whatever, to not be brainwashed into the current Zionist-induced mindset and remain free to criticize the actions of the Israeli state and/or the motivations of those Zionist Ashkenazi “Jews” controlling it to bend the mind of humanity toward their one-sided, psychopathic delusion that they, and only they, are the sole inheritors of the right to do whatever they damn well want while the rest of the world rolls over and allows them to destroy all that humankind has fashioned over the past two millennia that’s worthy and dignified in a spiritual, political or cultural sense.

Canada’s greatest challenge today is to enlighten the zombie-like attitudes of all those Canadians who’ve been so mind-controlled through the Zionist media and the education system over the past 60+ years that they truly believe supporting Israel and the Zionist agenda is a good thing for this nation.

Ted Pike’s novel idea of a dictionary is one way in which they can be debriefed of this seditious mental aberration; one that perpetuates the illusion of being good and honest people while in truth hindering their own freedom and the freedom of all Canadians to express their God-given, essential right to open opinion and criticism of any ideology that threatens the well being of our country.

Please pass this reference material on to as many people as you can and don’t forget to …

Shine your Light for Love, Peace & Justice for All,

Arthur Topham
Publisher/Editor
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998″
http://www.radicalpress.com
radical@radicalpress.com

 

ADL’S TWISTED HATE CRIMES DEFINITIONS: A DICTIONARY

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/adlstwistedhatedefinitionsdictionary.htm

By Rev. Ted Pike
24 Nov 10

Yellow plastic arches looming above streets from Taiwan to Tripoli mean McDonald’s USA. In the same way, identical terms in hate laws throughout the Western world are the logo of their architect: the Jewish Anti-Defamation League. ADL recently boasted of having masterminded the whole idea of hate laws, particularly in America.

ADL was privileged to lead a broad coalition of civil rights, religious, educational, professional, law-enforcement, and civic organizations that worked in support of the HCPA [Hate Crimes Prevention Act] for more than a decade. A pioneer in advocating for hate crimes legislation, the League published its first model hate crimes statute almost 30 years ago. Forty-five states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws based on or similar to the ADL model. (“ADL Welcomes First Indictments under Federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act,” adl.org)

Hate laws set up Christians and free thinkers for prosecution, making free speech into hate speech. To understand and combat hate laws, lovers of freedom must be able to recognize the twisted terms that show up in all hate crime educational materials and legislation. Virtually none mean what they suggest or promise. They are cleverly contrived to disempower Western majority populations’ Christian values; to fragment society into separate groups with different legal privileges and punishments; and to silence critical speech about sexual morality and minority religions. In short, there is no legislative tool more powerfully equipped to destroy Christian civilization today.

Here is a concise dictionary of the devious “doublespeak” ADL weaves into hate laws worldwide.

Affirmative Action – Unequal rights and advantages in employment and education given to ethnic minorities and women as a result of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Ostensibly meant to right historical wrongs, affirmative action undermines Christian society by moving it away from laws for individuals to laws for groups. It says people are deserving because of the class they belong to, not what they do. This inherently discriminatory principle continues to drive “civil rights” legislation today, especially in favor of blacks, Latinos, and women.

Anti-Semitism – To ADL, this term is not limited to belief that Jews are evil or deserve to die. It refers to: mere criticism of matters Jewish, including Jewish dominance of big media (See, Jews Confirm Big Media is Jewish), finance, and Congress; criticism of Israel; questioning the accuracy of the six-million figure of Holocaust Jewish dead; agreement with the New Testament claim that Jews masterminded the crucifixion of Christ; quotation of unflattering statements by Jews.

Attack on Israel – Any strong criticism, even if constructive or well-intentioned, of the Jewish state.

Bias (includes Bigotry and Prejudice) – Negative attitudes—primarily rooted in Biblical values—that are critical of homosexuality, Judaism, Islam, abortion, political liberalism, and other anti-Christian establishments that ADL believes it is wrong to oppose.

Bias-Motivated Crime (Hate Crime) – Any violation of US law motivated by a politically incorrect bias such as “homophobia;” such a crime deserves triple penalties compared to the same crime committed for a random or more personal reason. (In many countries mere public criticism of federally protected groups is also a hate crime.)

Blood Charge – The “anti-Semitic” New Testament statement that Jewish leaders masterminded and the Jewish population demanded the crucifixion of Christ. This is defined as the seminal cause of anti-Semitism over the past 2,000 years, leading to the Holocaust. It is defined as a source of continuous “anti-Semitism” and “irrational hatred” of Jews by Christians, making Christian countries inherently unsafe, violence-prone, irrational and racist.

Bullying – Criticism of homosexuality, Judaism, Jews or Israel, Islam, or minorities (other than whites or Christians) on campus, especially when it causes emotional discomfort to students who are part of such groups. Cyber-bullying – The same, only online.

Censorship – Attempts by Christian parents and leadership groups to restrain ADL/liberal promotion of homosexuality, pornography, sex education and secularist “respect for diversity” in public schools. (This term, of course, does not refer to ADL’s right to silence any form of Christian speech or of criticism of Israel on campus or online.)

Civility – ADL-suggested restraint in public criticism of President Obama and Democrats in Congress.

Civil Rights – Special rights and privileges in employment and housing given to blacks, Jews, Muslims, Hispanics, homosexuals/transgenders and women—not afforded to white, straight males or anyone with politically incorrect “biases.”

Civil Rights Act of 1964 – Basis for all US federal hate crimes legislation. Exalts certain favored groups above majority. Opens door for yet more classes to acquire such preference.

Conspirators — Millions of Americans, particularly Tea Party activists, who are intent on defeating Pres. Obama’s agenda and unseating Democrats in government through vehement criticism. (See, ADL Blasts ‘Paranoid’ Right)

Cyber Hate — Criticism of matters Jewish or of Israel online; quoting Bible passages against homosexuality online; distributing photographic evidence of abortion procedures online; etc.

Delegitimization of Israel – “Anti-Semitic” Biblical claim that God abhors occupation of His Holy Land by a nation of disobedient Jews (See, Israel: On the Way to Empire in the Mideast); “terrorist” claim that Israel acquired most of Palestine through violent theft and expropriation of 800,000 Arabs to concentrations camps; demand that dispossessed Palestinians be allowed to return and reoccupy stolen lands; statement that Israel at present is a racist and fundamentally unjust state which should be dismantled and replaced by a state equally participated in by Jews, Muslims, and Christians, all of whom are beneficiaries of its Abrahamic legacy.

Domestic (homegrown) Terrorists – (According to ADL/SPLC’s MIAC directives to police) Not just Muslim saboteurs but U.S. “anti-government” protesters, including supporters of Ron Paul and Chuck Baldwin, members of the Constitution Party, “militia” activists, “white supremacists,” proponents of a Constitutional Convention, “militant” opponents of abortion, and opponents of illegal immigration and the New World Order, NAFTA, federalization of the states, restrictive gun laws, and confiscatory taxation. (Infowars.com, “Secret State Police Report: Ron Paul, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin, Libertarians are Terrorists”)

Discrimination – In public schools, criticism of homosexuality, Judaism and Israel, Islam, etc. In business, refusal to hire a known homosexual or firing him or her because of their sexual activity. In housing, refusal to sell or rent to any of the above.

Diversity – Participation in a non-Christian sexual behavior or religion. Membership in a sexual, ethnic or religious group outside the white Christian majority. Respect for diversity — Acceptance of such divergent groups or lifestyles, particularly of homosexuality.

Equality (as promised in hate crimes bills) – Special rights and privileges for Jews, blacks, Latinos, women and homosexuals, with no such rights implied for the majority.

Gender Identity — The sex one perceives oneself to be, regardless of designated sex at birth; this gender identity should be respected by society and determines where a person should go to the bathroom, whom they can marry, and how they should be treated. If a person’s biological gender is different from their gender identity, society is responsible to ignore it.

Genocide – In a Jewish context, genocide can happen through delegitimization of the Jewish state and also through Christian conversion of Jews which kills Jewish souls.

Hate – Bias or criticism against specially protected groups.

Hate Crimes Statistics — Reports by police of alleged hate crimes, the great majority of which have never been adjudicated in court, most consisting of altercations and name-calling yet considered actual hate crimes by police and government and used as proof of an “epidemic of hate” in America and the world.

Hate Speech — Speech critical of protected groups, which should not be protected under the First Amendment; a form of psychological abuse of a persecuted community which government must end, even at the cost of others’ freedom.

Harassment (Intimidation) – Public criticism of protected groups (especially in government and public education); even if not accompanied by any threat of physical violence, such criticism of historically oppressed groups creates feelings of fear and intimidation and therefore must be outlawed and ended.

Hate-free environment – Public spaces, especially college campuses, where criticism of protected groups is not tolerated; in these spaces, it is unacceptable to speak against abortion (thus traumatizing post-abortive women), minority religions (upsetting their adherents), homosexuality (causing “mental anguish” to homosexuals), or other “historically marginalized” groups. The consciences, religious beliefs, and free speech of the white, Christian majority are not as important as the freedom from hurt feelings (and the lurking threat of violence) for minorities. Eventually, all of society should be a “hate-free environment.”

Holocaust – The indisputable fact that six million Jews were killed during World War II. Any questioning of this fact is evil and defames the memory of Jewish dead. Such Holocaust denial is an “anti-Semitic” hate crime worthy of loss of freedom and civil rights, deportation and imprisonment for more than six years.

Homophobia — Criticism of homosexuality.

Perceived Gender or Ethnicity – How others view you, regardless of how you view yourself, in regard to gender or ethnicity. Even if the bias-motivated attacker incorrectly perceives the victim’s gender or ethnicity, he must be punished as a hate criminal with triple penalties. The real crime is having biased thoughts.

Persecution of Jews – Vicious, primarily Christianity-incited verbal, social, and physical attacks on Jews for nearly 2,000 years, the ultimate hate crime.

Proselytization – Christian attempts through evangelism to destroy Jewish souls and cultural/ethnic identity. Successful proselytization leads to belief in the false prophet Jesus.

Racial profiling – Consideration by police (resulting in action) of the fact that members of certain specially protected groups (such as blacks) have a much higher rate of crime per capita than the majority population or may be illegal aliens (Latinos).

Racial Quotas – Government requirements that businesses, education institutions, government agencies, etc., prefer members of favored groups with hiring and admissions advantages, fulfilling prescribed numbers.

Racists — Individuals, particularly in white Christian culture, who advocate the superiority of white Christian civilization and morality. Zionism and the State of Israel, however, reflecting the exalted ethics of Judaism, do not exemplify such bigotry.

Religion (As Protected by Hate Laws) – Judaism and Islam, as minority religions in America, are protected while Christianity, a historically overgrown and persecutive religion, is not.

Sexual Orientation – Homosexuality and sexual deviancies which merit special hate crimes protection. Heterosexuality, preferred by the majority, is granted no protection.

Stereotypes – Broad, negative descriptions of blacks, Jews, Latinos, homosexuals or Judaism and Islam. It is permitted, however, for ADL to make sweeping negative generalizations against critics of Israel, portraying them as “anti-Semitic,” or against Christians, calling them homophobic, intolerant, bigoted, hateful, etc.

Tolerance – Non-criticism of Judaism, homosexuality or Islam.

Targeted Groups – Classes meriting special federal protection from verbal or physical “hate crime” attacks.

Transgender – A person who has had or merely intends biological sex change; anyone involved in gender-crossing or gender-bending requires special consideration by society and must be treated as a member of the gender with which they currently identify, regardless of whether it aligns with their biology or with their past or future gender identity.

Triple Penalties – The standard level of punishment merited by a hate crime under hate crimes law. Implication: A bias-motivated assault is three times as bad as a conventional assault.

Violent Radicalization — Becoming violent under influence of bias, particularly cyber-hate.

Xenophobia – Fear and mistrust, particularly by the white majority, of vastly disproportionate numbers of historically alien people which ADL encourages to settle in host countries, increasing “diversity” and diluting those cultures.

Zero Tolerance for Hate – Acceptance of free speech rights of homosexuals and religious minorities on campus but not for the rights of “homophobic” or Christian critics.

Summary

It is very clear that ADL hate laws—ostensibly meant to end bias—are themselves the epitome of bias. Virtually nothing ADL says, in public statements or the hate crimes legislation it writes, can be taken at face value. A manipulative, anti-Christian, anti-America agenda is always right below the surface. At this moment, the most glaring example of such duplicity is ADL’s bill HR 6216 which seeks to add “religion” to the protected classes in the Civil Rights Act. (See, ‘Don’t Criticize Jews and Muslims’ Bill Enters Congress)

In this bill, ADL has no intention of giving special rights and protection to all religions from bullying on tax-supported American campuses, but only to “harassed minorities:” Judaism and Islam. (We wish to point out that no religion should receive this twisted “protection” from criticism; we would oppose this legislation even if it gave special protection to Christians above the rights of atheists.)

Continue to protest this extremely dangerous legislation, now in the House Judiciary Committee. Come to Truthtellers.org Action Page for the names of the pivotal Republican committee members. Call them all with this message:

“Please oppose HR 6216, which would add “religion” to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It gives Jews and Muslims special protection from criticism on campus but doesn’t give such protection to Christians. This is more biased hate crimes legislation from the Anti-Defamation League to take away free speech and make Christians hate criminals.”

Why I Don’t Wear A Red Poppy On Remembrance Day

My father’s WWI service medals

If you were brave enough to click on this post, then please stay with me for a couple of minutes. Remember, I don’t make fun of people who wear red poppies. After all, my father was wounded by a sniper’s bullet for “king and country” in WWI and my namesake uncle perished in WWII. So I have solid reasons for wearing a poppy. But hear me out first before you condemn my personal action of not wearing a red poppy, an adornment  Robert Fisk calls “obscene fashion appendage – inspired by a pro-war poem.“

November 11 is Remembrance Day. In Canada it is a federal statutory holiday (except in the provinces of Nova Scotia, Ontario, Manitoba, Quebec, and three Territories). Wikipedia says it is

a Commonwealth holiday (observed in all Commonwealth countries except Mozambique) to commemorate the sacrifices of members of the armed forces and of civilians in times of war, specifically since the First World War. It is observed on 11 November to recall the end of World War I on that date in 1918 (major hostilities of World War I were formally ended “at the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month” of 1918 with the German signing of the Armistice).

Canadian Conrad Stoesz of the Mennonite religious persuasion writes why he doesn’t wear a red poppy. Instead, he wears a red pin made by Mennonite Central Committee that says, “To Remember is to Work for Peace.” He also promotes a website about conscientious objectors (COs).

Too often remembering is used to glorify war. When we speak of those who died in war, we often say “hero,” “buried with full military honours,” “he believed in the mission,” “died fighting for her country,” or “died for our freedom.” If we didn’t use such language, fewer would probably join the army. Remembrance Day services make me uneasy because they focus too much on those who died on “our side,” and, by implication, on God’s side. How often do we recall the larger picture – the loss of hopes and dreams, loss of innocence, psychological torment, and broken bodies regardless of allegiance? In WWII Canada lost some 45,000 soldiers. Germany lost 4 million soldiers and 2 million civilians. In total, more than 50 million people died as a result of the war.

Many people link their yearly commemoration of Canadian soldiers with support for current military missions. Take for example the classic and oft-cited Canadian poem, “In Flanders Fields.” Even though author John McCrae witnessed the horrific events of WWI, in part his poem is a call to continue the fight – to “take up our quarrel with the foe . . . ”

I believe it’s possible to acknowledge the sincerity of those who served but also question the use of force to achieve political goals. I grieve with the families who have lost loved ones but not in order to “take up our quarrel with the foe.” For me, the poppy carries too much of this baggage.

The Mennonite Brethren church stands firmly in the Anabaptist peace tradition. Our confession states, “We view violence in its many different forms as contradictory to the new nature of the Christian. We believe that the evil and inhumane nature of violence is contrary to the gospel of love and peace. In times of national conscription or war, we believe we are called to give alternative service where possible. Alleviating suffering, reducing strife, and promoting justice are ways of demonstrating Christ’s love.”

In WWII nearly 11,000 men of various backgrounds and faiths chose not to participate in violence but to serve in other ways. Mennonite Brethren leaders were instrumental in securing alternative options to carrying a gun designed to kill other humans. Over 7,500 of these COs were of Mennonite faith. The contribution they made was significant and still ongoing. It’s a part of Canadian history that needs attention in Canadian schools.

The CO story is vastly overshadowed. We are shelled everyday with images, stories, and glorification of war and violence. We need to hear our church’s viewpoint on this issue more than ever because the voices of the world are loud and penetrating with little thought of collateral damage.

U.S. president John F. Kennedy is quoted as saying, “War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today.” Even if J.F.K. is only half right, we whose history is rich in promotion of peace need to take every opportunity to tell the conscientious objector story for the good of our church and the world.

That’s why I don’t wear a poppy.

Is conscientious objector Conrad unpatriotic for not wearing a poppy? In my opinion, he is more patriotic than radical Christian Zionists who actually pray for war. If you like praying for war, here is a real war prayer: watch it.

Remembrance Day 2012
Nova Scotia, Canada

Much of the Remembrance Day celebration becomes somewhat of an industry.  Take for example the Royal Canadian Legion—an outfit that claims to remember the soldiers “who gave their lives that freedom might prevail.” ‘Donations’ are fixed retail prices if you want a red poppy or wreath at the Legion’s booth before Remembrance Day. But more than that, the Legion actually opposes freedom when it cuts into their profits. It claims to own the red war poppy and sues even war veterans who use it without the Legion’s “permission”. The Legion scoffs at the patriotic folks who wear the white peace poppy. For example, the Canadian Legion threatened to sue a distributor of white poppies! And the threats still continue. Did your loved ones die in the Great War for this kind of “freedom”? My father was shot in the head by a sniper and now I have to pay to wear a red war poppy? No thanks.

Did you know that those soldiers from Canada who died in WW2 were NOT Canadians?

Some of us wear red poppies today to remember the dead soldiers of World War I, but we are never taught to remember those who start wars and profit from them. You’ll be surprised and you ought to be outraged that our history books are merely propaganda by the “winners” of wars. Just a quick example about WWII: How many students know that Churchill’s great wartime speech “We shall fight them on the beaches” was given by a stand-in actor? Now, pick up the coffee mug you just dropped. Another mouth-dropper is the planned starvation of over 1 million German POWs, documented by Canadian historian, James Bacque, in Crimes and Mercies. We now know that Churchill was one of the greatest war criminals that ever lived, who “thrilled the uneducated masses” with his rhetoric and feasted on their cheers. Churchill mockingly admitted: “They cheered me as if I had given them a victory, instead of getting their houses bombed to bits.” Now award-winning British historian Peter Padfield exposes the big lie of WWII and confirms Churchill’s guilt. Read it if you dare. I get tired of hearing that our soldiers fought for our freedoms. The truth is, soldiers were duped by their own governments. And those behind the scenes were laughing all the way to their banks.

On Remembrance Day, let’s remember the greatest killing machine of all time: our own governments. Professor Richard Ebeling says in a review of Professor Rummel’s book Death by Government:

The megamurdering states of the 20th century have been: the U.S.S.R. (1917-1987), 61,911,000 [mostly Christian]; Communist China (1949-1987), 35,236,000; Nazi Germany (1933-1945), 20,946,000; and Nationalist (or Kuomintang) China (1928-1949), 10,076,000. These are followed by the “lesser” megamurdering states: Japan (1936-1945), 5,964,000; Cambodia (1975-1979), 2,035,000; Turkey (1909-1918), 1,883,000; Vietnam (1945-1987), 1,678,000; North Korea (1948-1987), 1,663,000; Poland (1945-1948), 1,585,000; Pakistan (1958-1987), 1,503,000; Mexico (1900-1920), 1,417,000; Yugoslavia (1944-1987), 1,072,000; Czarist Russia (1900-1917), 1,066,000.

I think rather than fighting over who wears a red or white poppy, we would benefit more from remembering the holocausts endured by other peoples: for example, the Cambodians, Ukrainians, Russians, the many nations of    Europe, Laotians, Chinese, Africans, Latin Americans, Armenians, and Native Indians of Canada.

The Noble Prize-winning Russian Christian and Gulag survivor, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn offered practical advice. After living through the horrors of the Zionist Bolshevik Revolution which tortured and murdered 62,00,000 Christians (double the population of Canada), he said those responsible for war should repent. Amen.

Canada, once known for its peacekeeping worldwide, is today an aggressive war-mongering nation like the USA. The pro-Zionists in Canada’s Parliament voted to allow Canada to lead the NATO-bombing of Libya to destabilize the richest country in Africa, while at the same time it has only 33 military personnel in peacekeeping activities. And not one word of protest came from the Canadian Legion or militant Christian Zionists. Does such hypocrisy alarm you?

Some things never change. Over 200 years ago, the Christian historian Edward Gibbon observed that “The courage of a soldier is found to be the cheapest and most common quality of human nature.” And, “[A]s long as mankind shall continue to bestow more liberal applause on their destroyers than on their benefactors, the thirst of military glory will ever be the vice of the most exalted characters.”

This is why, today, we continue to glorify killing in war by “honoring” “fallen heroes,” “who died for our country,” even in far away Afghanistan. And which is why, I too, do not wear a red poppy.

Haitian Holocaust

By Greg Palast

January 17, 2010 “The Huffington Post” – –

[Thanks Information Clearing House]

Click on image to enlarge

1.
Bless the President for having rescue teams in the air almost immediately. That was President Olafur Grimsson of Iceland. On Wednesday, the AP reported that the President of the United States promised, “The initial contingent of 2,000 Marines could be deployed to the quake-ravaged country within the next few days.” “In a few days,” Mr. Obama?

2.
There’s no such thing as a ‘natural’ disaster. 200,000 Haitians have been slaughtered by slum housing and IMF “austerity” plans.

3.
A friend of mine called. Do I know a journalist who could get medicine to her father? And she added, trying to hold her voice together, “My sister, she’s under the rubble. Is anyone going who can help, anyone?” Should I tell her, “Obama will have Marines there in ‘a few days'”?

4.
China deployed rescuers with sniffer dogs within 48 hours. China, Mr. President. China: 8,000 miles distant. Miami: 700 miles close. US bases in Puerto Rico: right there.

5.
Obama’s Defense Secretary Robert Gates said, “I don’t know how this government could have responded faster or more comprehensively than it has.” We know Gates doesn’t know.

6.
From my own work in the field, I know that FEMA has access to ready-to-go potable water, generators, mobile medical equipment and more for hurricane relief on the Gulf Coast. It’s all still there. Army Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré, who served as the task force commander for emergency response after Hurricane Katrina, told the Christian Science Monitor, “I thought we had learned that from Katrina, take food and water and start evacuating people.” Maybe we learned but, apparently, Gates and the Defense Department missed school that day.

7.
Send in the Marines. That’s America’s response. That’s what we’re good at. The aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson finally showed up after three days. With what? It was dramatically deployed — without any emergency relief supplies. It has sidewinder missiles and 19 helicopters.

8.
But don’t worry, the International Search and Rescue Team, fully equipped and self-sufficient for up to seven days in the field, deployed immediately with ten metric tons of tools and equipment, three tons of water, tents, advanced communication equipment and water purifying capability. They’re from Iceland.

9.
Gates wouldn’t send in food and water because, he said, there was no “structure … to provide security.” For Gates, appointed by Bush and allowed to hang around by Obama, it’s security first. That was his lesson from Hurricane Katrina. Blackwater before drinking water.

10.
Previous US presidents have acted far more swiftly in getting troops on the ground on that island. Haiti is the right half of the island of Hispaniola. It’s treated like the right testicle of Hell. The Dominican Republic the left. In 1965, when Dominicans demanded the return of Juan Bosch, their elected President, deposed by a junta, Lyndon Johnson reacted to this crisis rapidly, landing 45,000 US Marines on the beaches to prevent the return of the elected president.

11.
How did Haiti end up so economically weakened, with infrastructure, from hospitals to water systems, busted or non-existent – there are two fire stations in the entire nation – and infrastructure so frail that the nation was simply waiting for “nature” to finish it off?

Don’t blame Mother Nature for all this death and destruction. That dishonor goes to Papa Doc and Baby Doc, the Duvalier dictatorship, which looted the nation for 28 years. Papa and his Baby put an estimated 80% of world aid into their own pockets – with the complicity of the US government happy to have the Duvaliers and their voodoo militia, Tonton Macoutes, as allies in the Cold War. (The war was easily won: the Duvaliers’ death squads murdered as many as 60,000 opponents of the regime.)

12.
What Papa and Baby didn’t run off with, the IMF finished off through its “austerity” plans. An austerity plan is a form of voodoo orchestrated by economists zomby-fied by an irrational belief that cutting government services will somehow help a nation prosper.

13.
In 1991, five years after the murderous Baby fled, Haitians elected a priest, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, who resisted the IMF’s austerity diktats. Within months, the military, to the applause of Papa George HW Bush, deposed him.
History repeats itself, first as tragedy, then as farce. The farce was George W. Bush. In 2004, after the priest Aristide was re-elected President, he was kidnapped and removed again, to the applause of Baby Bush.

14.
Haiti was once a wealthy nation, the wealthiest in the hemisphere, worth more, wrote Voltaire in the 18th century, than that rocky, cold colony known as New England. Haiti’s wealth was in black gold: slaves. But then the slaves rebelled – and have been paying for it ever since.

From 1825 to 1947, France forced Haiti to pay an annual fee to reimburse the profits lost by French slaveholders caused by their slaves’ successful uprising. Rather than enslave individual Haitians, France thought it more efficient to simply enslave the entire nation.

15.
Secretary Gates tells us, “There are just some certain facts of life that affect how quickly you can do some of these things.” The Navy’s hospital boat will be there in, oh, a week or so. Heckuva job, Brownie!

16.
Note just received from my friend. Her sister was found, dead; and her other sister had to bury her. Her father needs his anti-seizure medicines. That’s a fact of life too, Mr. President.