Satan At The Wailing Wall: A Roman Fortress

February 28, 2013

Freedom of Speech: The Case Against ‘Hate Crimes’ Laws

February 21, 2013
Dear Free Speech Supporter,
To succinctly summarize the importance and meaning of freedom of speech is no small task. I have laboured on this short essay for many an hour trying to distil the essence down to where it might become 100% proof and with the light of a match burst into a flame of truth bright enough to expose the underlying deception that now exists in Canadian law with respect to this subject.
Please take the time to read it and ponder its implications and should the import of its plea hold meaning for you pass it along to others who you may feel could also benefit from reading it.
It was obviously written in my own defence but I’m hopeful that upon understanding all the implications of these unjust laws that you will be able to see the danger to all Canadians who value this crucial right.


Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
Freedom of Speech 
by Arthur Topham
“There’s no such thing as ‘Hate Speech.’ 
You either have FREE speech or you don’t – it’s that simple.”
Were I able to stand as Norman Rockwell’s iconic American citizen once stood, expressing one of the four basic inherent freedoms of democracy, I would have the following to say about the subject of freedom of speech.

Foremost is the realization of the duel nature of subject. There are two components to freedom of speech that form the basis for all the myriad variations on the theme of communication; one is the freedom to lie and deceive (both oneself and others) and the second (the most critical) is the freedom to speak the truth. When the freedom to lie and deceive gains the upper hand and establishes itself as the only freedom allowed within a society it signals the eventual demise of the remainder of that society’s freedoms as well and the beginning of a process of mass self-deception, denial and decay eventually leading to enslavement to false ideals which, ultimately, must result in the final death and destruction of the affected society or nation.

The issue of whether or not people ought to have unlimited freedom to express whatever thoughts and opinions they may hold is, at this important juncture in humanity’s evolvement toward universal freedom and peaceful co-existence, of the utmost and fundamental importance and will determine whether or not we survive both as a species and as free and independent individuals.
While this may sound at first like a rather preposterous and pretentious pronouncement to make nonetheless it bears urgent consideration given the relative and recent turn of events over the past century; ones which have accelerated all the major components of a nation’s (and a planet’s) essential nature –  political, economic, social, cultural and environmental – to such a degree of intensity that the world is now facing a global dilemma of such scale that at no other time in our collective past have we had to face the harsh, impending realities that presently lay before us.
The litany of lies and deception and the magnitude of malfeasance on the part of our governments, our judiciaries, our religious institutions, coupled with the calculated, criminal complicity of the corporations and media, has reached a zenith of decadence and delusion and unless, as a collectively conscious and united whole, we the people of planet Earth begin to openly analyze and question the root causes of our combined quandary we will soon lose the one key able to unlock the mystery of the dismal human predicament we now find ourselves in.
That key is the individual’s ability to express their thoughts and ideas freely and without fear on any conceivable subject. It is not hyperbolical to state that this freedom is akin to one’s right to breath the common air that surrounds the planet or drink the liquid element we call water without which our bodies quickly cease to function. It’s synonymous with our right to eat healthy, vital, life-giving food that nourishes and sustains our physical self rather than being forced to consume adulterated, genetically modified food substitutes that are proven causes of disease and deformity in all living entities. It is parallel with one’s right and freedom to light a fire on a cold winter’s night to keep themselves warm or to seek shade when the sun’s beneficent rays become too hot to handle. Freedom of speech is therefore quintessential to our emotional, mental and spiritual health and well-being and cannot be allowed to be infringed upon by any organized body, be they legislators or lobbyists, for whatever reasons they might conjure up in their defence.
There are those who would scoff at pronouncements such as these and counter with endless argumentation, pleading that restrictions upon a person’s right to freedom of expression are necessary for the greater good of the public at large, all the while rolling out their reasons why this and that particular aspect of speech is dangerous or harmful to certain segments of society and therefore ought to be seen as a necessary compromise in order to protect whatever minority group that might be affected by the opinions or thoughts of others which they deem inimical to the interests of the aforesaid group. That is all part of the process of freedom of speech and ought to remain sacrosanct even though it is a plea for restrictions. This same sort of argument against limiting freedom of speech also uses such ruses as “a person cannot be allowed to yell ‘fire’ inside a crowded theatre or room” in a vain effort to lend credence to their seemingly innocuous arguments for restricting speech yet at the same time they refuse to acknowledge the beneficial results that often can result from a person who senses a grave danger in the body politic itself and yells “be aware!” via whatever medium of expression is available to them, be it a soap box, a song, a newspaper, a book or the Internet.
Where such proposed limitations cease to have meaning or validity and become a threat to every citizen’s fundamental right to freedom of speech is when they advocate the imposition of criminal charges such as are contained in sec. 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Code and in sec. 319(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. It is here the metaphoric Rubicon of reason and common sense has been crossed and double-crossed and tyranny begins. It is here that all of our combined freedoms end and Orwell’s fiction becomes fact. Thus the necessity to rid Canadian jurisprudence of these dangerous, undemocratic “hate crime” laws that benefit only specified minority interests and penalize the fundamental freedoms of the vast majority.
Such is the pressing predicament that restrictions on freedom of speech pose; not only for the person who tries to warn others of impending threats to their (and other’s) well being but for those who, unbeknownst to themselves, are being led into lifestyles or linear patterns of thinking that ultimately are not beneficial to the planet or its inhabitants.
As the quote above this article clearly states, we either have freedom of speech or we don’t. There is no in-between stage; no dead zone of arbitrary discernment; no no-man’s-land of equivocation; no bardo plane of intermediary bluff that can be exploited and manipulated to the detriment of this fundamental right of all people everywhere and used to justify its limitations. All our freedoms rest upon this one. Never forget it.
NOTE: The struggle to retain our inherent right to freedom of speech doesn’t come without costs both financially and otherwise. Out of necessity, I am forced to ask for financial assistance in this ongoing battle with the foreign interest censors who are determined to stop all freedom of expression in Canada. Being a ‘Senior Citizen’ on a very limited pension and having now been denied assistance by Legal Aid services here in B.C. this leaves me in the unenviable position of having to rely solely upon donations from supporters to pay my legal expenses. 
As such I would ask readers to give serious consideration to helping me out by either sending a donation via PayPal using either a PayPal account or a credit card or else sending a cheque or Money Order or cash to me via snail mail at the following postal address. Please don’t make the cheque out to “RadicalPress” as that account is no longer available to me.
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C
V2J 6T8
To access my PayPal button please go to either the Home Page at or my blog The PayPal button is up on the right hand corner of the Home Page on either site. Feel free to click on it.
Arthur Topham
The Radical Press

Quick way to stop church gossip

February 20, 2013

How_to_Stop_the_Church_GossipMs. Mable, the church gossip, and self-appointed monitor of the church’s morals, kept sticking her nose into other people’s business.

Several members did not approve of her extra curricular activities, but feared her enough to maintain their silence.

She made a mistake, however, when she accused Frank, a new member, of being an alcoholic after she saw his old pickup parked in front of the town’s only bar one afternoon.

She emphatically told Frank (and several others) that everyone seeing it there would know what he was doing!

Frank, a man of few words, stared at her for a moment and just turned and walked away. He didn’t explain, defend, or deny. He said nothing.

Later that evening, Frank quietly parked his old pickup in front of Mable’s house, walked home…and left it there all night.

Can Christians Rely On The Bible?

February 20, 2013
[I came across this email exchange yesterday, and decided to put it here. Feel free to add your own opinion! mw]
Tuesday, March 5, 2002 2:32 AM
“Carol A. Valentine” <>

This is a limited mailing.  The text below was written by a reader.
Forgive me if I step on your toes, but when I went to school and when
I went to church I COULD NOT STAND Paul.  Name Withheld might have
the bull by the horns.


Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2002 11:59:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Name Withheld
Subject: Articles and Scholarly critiques on Pharisees

I was introduced to your website by [ ….. ] and am rather a slow
reader (characterized by slow comprehension if that is an appropriate
description of myself at this point in time).

I must congratulate you for such scholarly researches and critiques
on Pharisaism. Allow me to share certain more details that you may
have missed to prove your point of view, to wit:

(1) All Bible versions that I know of and read about vividly
describes how the Jews (from the time of Moses and the search for the
Promised Land) have mastered the art of espionage and
disinformation/destabilization. The Old Testament is replete of
hundreds of examples and vivid descriptions of what the Jews resorted
to as they identified the towns and cities they intended to pass
through and/or occupy as they searched and travelled to the Promised
Land. As they have identified these towns and cities, they have sent
spies, special agents, etc. to these sites to identify, determine,
and assess potential threats to Jewish lives and properties. They
have even included in their prayers to their God instructions and
requests for their God to send in plagues and sickness to their
perceived enemies so that they can occupy targeted lands without loss
of life or property.

(2) If this is an accepted Jewish practice and tradition (i.e. to
send spies and special agents to identify and assess threats to their
lives, properties, and their religion), what would have stopped the
Pharisees, Saduccees and Sanhedrins of Jesus’ time to send spies and
special agents to penetrate the early Christian movement when the
leader of this movement has made it very clear that he (i.e. Jesus)
is out to get them by exposing their guts to the public? Was not Saul
of Tarsus (or St. Paul as Christians would love to refer to today) a
Pharisee, the son of a well known, well-entrenched Pharisee during
Jesus’ time, a spy and special agent sent to penetrate the early
Christian movement whose dictated agenda was to make sure that the
movement does not steer completely against and away from the
established religious practices of the Pharisees during that time?

(2.1.) How could the Christian Church evolve into an organization
which is completely similar and stereo-type of the Jewish Church
which Jesus abhorred and spoke eloquently against? Where did this
Judeo-Christian religion have its roots? Why is the New Testament
mostly consisting of Letters of Paul with some sprinkling of gospel
versions of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John when the Dead Sea Scrolls
are now revealing that there are gospel versions according to Thomas,
Bartholomew, and even Mary Magdalene who apparently became one of the
apostles of Jesus Christ but never mentioned in the Bible? Why were
these gospel versions not merit inclusion but the Letters of Paul
merited all the Bible spaces humanly possible? Did you ever wonder

(2.2.) Do you know that there are today modern Jews that now admit
that they have, indeed, a Messiah who came during the early Christian
movement in the person of Saul of Tarsus? What does a Messiah do?
Save, right? Did not Saul of Tarsus save the Jewish religion and
traditional practices to this date and age? You be the judge.

Food for thought.


Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 12:10:19 -0800 (PST)
From: NW
Subject: Re: Articles and Scholarly critiques on Pharisees
To: “Carol A. Valentine” <>

Dear Carol,

If you are thinking of sharing this information with your colleagues
and readers and intend to omit/delete my name and email address, Yes
you may. Please note I prefer to remain anonymous to potential
enemies whom I could not readily identify myself. What is important
is to be able to share these ideas with others so that they may have
a more balanced perspective of the realities of this world and what
the truth really is. Ours maybe unintelligible voices in the
wilderness crying out for people to listen and wake up, and we might
get frustrated at times when we appear not to be getting any
intelligible response(s). Just remember that America is the melting
pot of all cultures, and hundreds of thousands of highly-educated
immigrants land in our soil every single year that passes. They are
the ones we ought to target specifically as they are learned and
educated unlike certain of our citizenry who follow the route our
government make them take by merely getting a high school education
and in most occasions, unable to grasp the implications of everyday

More power to you and your group!


Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 13:34:28 -0800 (PST)
From: NW
Subject: re Saul and Question of Reliability of the Bible

Dear Carol,

It would be totally irresponsible of me to give you only a one-sided
view of how unreliable and corrupted the Bible would appear to be
especially as we begin to question the loyalty and hidden agenda of
Saul of Tarsus and his role as operative of the Pharisees and
Sadducees of Jesus’ time. Once the truth is revealed, I must caution
you that the concommitant result would be the total collapse of the
Christian and Jewish religion as they now exist. We cannot allow
innocent victims of a 2,000 year old fraud to become directionless
and totally un-armed with a solution or an alternative. That would be
a reckless thing to do, won’t it?

Based on the argument that if the New Testament portion of the Bible
is unreliable and replete of machinations of the Jewish Pharisees and
scribes, what document can Christians of today rely on, if there is
any? Fortunately, there is one that is readily available also in the
internet.  This document is called The Didache, and if you and your
group will research enough, you will find out that the origin of this
document date back as early as 50 AD (long before the Bible, as
it now exists, came into being at around 300 AD when Emperor
Constantin mandated the leaders of the Christian movement to come up
with a code by which the Empire could judge the Christians by and
which action immediately transformed Christianity from being a mere
cult into an accepted religion).  If you have not come across this
document, you will be equally surprised to find out that the
teachings of Jesus Christ can really be summed up in 4 or 5 pages
with such clarity that cannot be paralleled or equalled by the Bible.
I use the english translation of Dr. Lightfoot as it helps me
understand the contents as much as I could possible digest.

Please note that as you research on this document, you will be told
that nobody had paid any attention to this document because most
experts believed they are irrelevant, no historical or doctoral
importance, etc. Of course, that ought to be expected especially if
the same and very document that you are researching on tells you in
no uncertain terms that the Christian movement (i.e. The Way, the
Truth and the Light Movement) has nothing to do with money and money
making activities which the Jewish and Christian churches are solidly
founded on. But as you read through the document, you will see the
real hand and words coming from an extra-ordinary person of Jesus,
who 2,000 years ago foresaw that the root of all evil is Money!.

Just thought I would warn you ahead of time that the subject we are
dealing on involves the fate of billions of people all over the
world, and we must be careful in our treatment of the subject and its

Food for thought.

Carol A. Valentine
President, Public Action, Inc.
See the handiwork of the world’s leading terrorist organization, the FBI:
Visit the Waco Holocaust Electronic Museum

911 Lies exposed at

Russian meteorite crash: LIVE UPDATES

February 16, 2013


Meteorite hits Russian Urals: Fireball explosion wreaks havoc, up to 1,200 injured (PHOTOS, VIDEO)

Sixty-Six Million Christians Murdered By Jewish Bolsheviks

February 16, 2013

The Mass Murder of Russian Christians and the Destruction of their Churches, by Lasha Darkmoon

STALIN’S JEWS (See here)

The other day I received a polite email from one of my many critics. He was less than satisfied with a controversial statement I had made in one of my articles. He had detected what appeared to be a serious discrepancy in what I had written about the Bolshevik Jews who had engineered the Russian Revolution (1917) and had managed to kill, in the process, some 66 million Russian Christians.

Here is what my critic had to say:

Email from Mark. E. Moore,
February 12, 2013
RE: The Building of
Synagogues under Stalin

Dear Lasha:

In your online article, “Satan’s Secret Agents: the Frankfurt School and their Evil Agenda (posted 02/13/13), you wrote:

“In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist Jews, the emptying of churches was accomplished by the simply expedient of burning the churches down—thousands of them—and building synagogues instead.” (Boldness added.)

However, the source cited (see here) for your statement contradicts your statement itself:

“For a few years, Soviet Jews were allowed to use Yiddish in Jewish schools and to publish Yiddish and Hebrew newspapers. However, synagogues were closed down. In fact, while Yiddish and Hebrew were tolerated, or at least encouraged, the official policy was to use these languages as instruments to effect the total assimilation of the Jews. Thus, while the Soviet government officially condemned anti-Semitism, it aimed at eradicating the Jewish faith.

“There was also renewed persecution of the Jews. Apart from having their synagogues closed and their Rabbis arrested, they were discriminated against in education as well as in military, political, and educational careers.”

(Boldness added)

Please explain the discrepancy and cite other sources for your statement that Stalin built synagogues in the stead of Christian churches.

Very truly yours,

Mark E. Moore

*          *          *

This was a valid criticism, impeccably expressed, but I resented something in the tone of the writer which seemed to suggest that he was trying to make excuses for these Jewish revolutionaries led by Lenin who was himself partly Jewish: that he was trying to diminish their role in these atrocities, and, so to speak, let the Jews off the hook for having committed mass murder on an unprecedented scale.

This is what I wrote in response to him. My apologies if the language here is a bit emotional at times. Mass murder, I guess, is an emotional subject. So bear with me.

“The unprecedented catastrophe of the Russian revolution required an explanation… For very many this lay in the coming to power of the Jews, and their hatred for the Russian people. For after the revolution of February, 1917, the Jews acquired full rights with the rest of the population, and the barriers set up by the Pale of Settlement were destroyed. Jews poured from the western regions into the major cities of European Russia and soon acquired prominent executive positions in all major sectors of government and the economy…. The mainly Jewish nature of the Bolshevik leadership—and of the world revolution in general—cannot be doubted….

“The Jews were especially dominant in the most feared and bloodthirsty part of the Bolshevik State apparatus, the Cheka, which, writes Brendon, “consisted of 250,000 officers (including 100,000 border guards). In the first 6 years of Bolshevik rule it had executed at least 200,000. Moreover, the Cheka was empowered to act as ‘policeman, gaoler, investigator, prosecutor, judge and executioner’. It also employed barbaric forms of torture….

“So complete was the Jewish domination of Russia as a result of the revolution that it is a misnomer to speak about the ‘Russian revolution’; it should more accurately be called the ‘Russian-Jewish revolution’.”

(Scroll down to “Bolshevism and the Jews”, here)

Email from Lasha Darkmoon,
February 16, 2013

Dear Mark,

Thank you for pointing out the defective link in my article. How it got in there I have no idea. Sometimes these things happen when one is writing and publishing in haste. I have deleted the defective link and substituted the following paragraph in its place: “See here, here, here, here and here for more details on the systematic destruction of Christian churches and the persecution of Russian Christians under the Jewish leaders of the Russian Revolution. See also extended endnote” 

The extended endnote (duplicated below) will be of particular interest to you, though it may not satisfy you if you are a committed Zionist and wish to find excuses for the well-documented crimes of the Bolshevik Jews after the 1917 Russian Revolution.

I am well aware that Jews were among those killed in Stalin’s purges and that some synagogues may have been closed down, but that occurred at a much later date and it does not in any way exculpate the Jews for their strikingly prominent role in the Bolshevik Revolution—and it certainly does not make the Jews the victims of the Revolution, no matter how hard they strive for victim status. They are the war criminals here. Period.

The authority you quote, and to which I mistakenly provided a link, appears to be a Zionist source. I do not trust Zionist sources as a matter of principle. They are known to lie and exaggerate and indulge in elaborate fantasies. Weren’t they the ones who got us into the Iraq War on false pretenses, relating to non-existent weapons of mass destruction? And aren’t they trying to pull the same fast one on us right now in regard to Iran?

Even after the Stalinist purges, organized Jewry remained entrenched in power in the Soviet Union. Jews continued to occupy all the most important posts in the Soviet government. And Stalin who was head honcho, though not a Jew nominally, was the ultimate Shabbat goy, a Jew in all but name or what some might wish to call a “spiritual Jew”. He married into a Jewish family, had Jewish mistresses and friends, and at every point in his career was surrounded by Jewish commissars. Lenin, who was partly Jewish, had always been his role model and chief ideological influence.

Stalin with his Jewish-brother-in-law, Lazar Kagaonvich.
(Hard to tell them apart)

Stalin’s Jewish brother-in-law moreover, Lazar Kaganovich, remained Stalin’s constant advisor, confidante and close friend. And Kaganovich was the greatest mass murderer of them all, reportedly claiming responsibility for the death of 20 million people. Funnily enough, Kaganovich was to outlive all the other Bolshevik killers, dying only in 1991—whereas Stalin met his Maker in March 1953 after one of his closest buddies, probably Comrade Beria, slipped some rat poison into his wine.

On a former occasion, when in debate with Israel Shamir, I had this to say about Lazar Kaganovich and the other omnipotent Soviet Jews who helped to make life a living hell for millions of Russian Christians. These mass murderers, purportedly running a revolution in support of the working classes—“the dictatorship of the proletariat”—managed to kill tens of millions of innocent peasants in the process. To improve the world these miserable sonofabitches needed to wade through seas of blood. And later on some Jew in Hollywood would quip, “You can’t make an omelette without breaking eggs!”

Kaganovich and his evil crew of natural born killers certainly knew how to break heads as easily as you and I know how to break eggs. “The death of one man is a tragedy, the death of a million is a statistic,” Stalin is said to have joked on one occasion.

Here is what I wrote roughly a year ago in an article:

“One Jew alone, the infamous Lazar Kaganovich, personally claimed responsibility for killing twenty million [people]. It was he who stood atop the rubble of a Christian church and proclaimed, “Mother Russia has been cast down! We have torn away her skirts!”

“Apart from Kaganovich, there were other Jews who contributed to the massacre of Christians under the cruelest circumstances: Ilya Ehrenburg, Natalfy Frenkel, Mathias Berman, Genrikh Yagoda (lingerie pervert), and, last but not least, Lavrenti Beria—though Beria may or may not have been Jewish. Mainstream historians assert that he was not. But they would, wouldn’t they?—given that Beria was not only a mass murderer of peasants, but also a bloodthirsty sex maniac and pedophile who buried children in his basement—probably alive. (See here and here, pp. 516-519).

“At no other time in the history of the world has a country been so saturated with Jewish influence as it was between 1917 and 1953 in the Soviet Union: the time of the great gulags and the merciless slaughter of the peasants.”

Incidentally, I will be dealing with this topic in more detail in a separate article soon.

You quote me as writing the following in my article on the Frankfurt School, objecting to the four words in bold font: “In the Soviet Union, under Stalin and his Communist Jews, the emptying of churches was accomplished by the simply expedient of burning the churches down—thousands of them—and building synagogues instead.” You will be pleased to hear that I have decided to delete these four words in bold font, since I have been unable to locate my original source for this statement or to find any reliable documentary evidence of synagogue substitution for demolished churches.

However, these four words in bold font, “and building synagogues instead”, are not really necessary. In principle, I see no reason why these Jewish revolutionaries, who actually went out of their way to demolish Christian churches, should raise any objections to the erection of synagogues if their fellow Jews should request such new synagogues. Suffice to say that we have more than enough evidence that Orthodox Christian churches were demolished in huge numbers, which is all that really needs to be said.

See “Endnote” HERE (but also duplicated below) for more details on the destruction of Orthodox Christian churches and the systematic torture and mass murder of Russian Christians by the Bolshevik Jews.

Sincere best wishes,

Lasha Darkmoon

Note that quote carefully: “Kaganovich also ordered the shocking demolition in downtown Moscow of the Cathedral of Christ the Savior in 1931. It was replaced by a giant swimming pool.”

*          *          *


American historian Edwin Schoonmaker writes:

“Fifteen years after the Bolshevist Revolution was launched to carry out the Marxist program, the editor of the American Hebrew could write: “According to such information that the writer could secure while in Russia a few weeks ago, not one Jewish synagogue has been torn down, as have hundreds—perhaps thousands of the Greek Catholic Churches… In Moscow and other large cities one can see Christian churches in the process of destruction… the Government needs the location for a large building,” (American Hebrew, Nov. 18, 1932, p. 12) Apostate Jews, leading a revolution that was to destroy religion as the “opiate of the people” had somehow spared the synagogues of Russia.” (“Democracy and World Dominion,” 1939, p.211). 

Wikipedia tells us that the Communist state after the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution  was “committed to the destruction of religion”, and destroyed churches, mosques and temples — no mention of synagogues being destroyed  and that it “ridiculed, harassed and executed [Christian] religious leaders, flood[ing] the schools and media with atheistic propaganda.”

Since the Russian Revolution was essentially a Jewish revolution, with an overwhelmingly high percentage of its leaders being Jewish, one can understand why synagogues were NOT destroyed. The animosity of the Jewish leadership was directed almost exclusively toward the Christian clergy and their churches. Monks, nuns and priests were put to death in large numbers, often after being cruelly tortured in the process, their eyes gouged out and in some instances being boiled alive.

(For graphic details of the systematic torture of Christians under the Bolsheviks, see here and section 7, “Fiendish tortures devised by the Jewish cheka”, here).

According to the Atlantic, September 1991, p.14, “In 1919, three-quarters of the Cheka staff in Kiev were Jews, who were careful to spare fellow Jews. (See footnote 21, here)

For more on the specifically Jewish character of the Russian Revolution, see here and here.

Russian-born Jewish writer Sonya Margolina goes so far as to call the Jewish role in supporting the Bolshevik regime the “historic sin of the Jews.” She points, for example, to the prominent role of Jews as commandants of Soviet Gulag concentration and labor camps, and the role of Jewish Communists in the systematic destruction of Russian churches. Moreover, she goes on, “The Jews of the entire world supported Soviet power, and remained silent in the face of any criticism from the opposition.”

In light of this record, Margolina offers a grim prediction:

“The exaggeratedly enthusiastic participation of the Jewish Bolsheviks in the subjugation and destruction of Russia is a sin that will be avenged. Soviet power will be equated with Jewish power, and the furious hatred against the Bolsheviks will become hatred against Jews.” (Cited here)

A red-hot poker, when pushed through the bars of the cage, would force the maddened rat to escape by gnawing its way into the stomach of the human prisoner. This is one of the tortures the Bolshevik Jews are reported to have introduced from China. They certainly had Chinese torturers working for them, just as today the American government has relied heavily on the expertise of Israeli torturers at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere.

Further corroboration for the horrendous crimes committed by the Jewish Bolsheviks will be found in part 2 of this 2-part article by Lasha Darkmoon. The most detailed and impassioned account of Jewish atrocities committed against Christians is probably  Eustace Mullin’s cult classic article, The Secret Holocaust: The real holocaust was a Christian Holocaust by Jews of sixty-six millions, mostly Christians.

Personal feedback:
Comments invited

Dr. Benjamin Carson Educates President Obama

February 16, 2013

Churches That Support Racism, Wars, Ethnic Cleansing, Assassinations

February 6, 2013

apocalypse.jpgIs your church a Christian church or a “Christian Zionist” church? If your church leaders agree with the following quotations, then you are attending a Christian Zionist church which supports racism, wars, ethnic cleansing, assassinations, etc. If your church leaders disagree with the following quotations, then you are attending a truly Christian church, following the example of Jesus Christ Himself.

1. “[E]very act taken by Israel is orchestrated by God…” Rev. Dr. Jerry Falwell

2. “There is no such thing as a Palestinian.” Rev. Malcolm Hedding

3. “Whoever sits in the confines of Washington, and suggests to the people of Israel that they have to give up more land in exchange for peace, that’s an obscenity.” Gary Bauer

4. “Israel is a pro-Western, democratic nation committed to the ideals of free speech and press…,” Hal Lindsey

5. “I would (run for President) if I believed that that is the right thing to do for Israel.” Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin

6. “Ethiopia will be one of the ungodly nations that go against Israel…” President Ronald Reagan

7. “[A] land called Palestine is a hoax!” Dave Hunt

8. “Shame on the Presbyterian church [for wanting divestment]…Israel has given Christians everything they have…” Rev. Dr. Charles McVety

9. “Israel is America’s closest and most trusted ally.” Pastor John Hagee

10. “When God comes to judge the nations, he will judge them on their response to the regathering of Israel.” Derek Prince

11. “[I]f he thinks we’re trying to assassinate him [president of Venezuela], I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it.”    Rev. Pat Robertson

12. “[A]s a nation we have been blessed because of our relationship with Israel, and if we reject Israel, then there is a curse that comes into play.” US Congresswoman Michele Bachmann

13. Former supermodel Kathy Ireland, as a born-again Christian Zionist,“has an unwavering belief in the righteousness of [Israel’s] actions.” Jerusalem Post newspaper

14. “Only one nation, Israel, stands between…terrorist aggression and the complete decline of the United States as a  democratic world power…” Mike Evans

The Crucifixion of War Hero Senator Chuck Hagel

February 5, 2013

%d bloggers like this: