Separation of Church and Hate

April 29, 2011

The New World Order, Separation of Church & Hate

Part 18

By Deanna Spingola

18 November 2006

According to the globalists, the Constitution must be crushed in order to establish global governance. Every freedom must be revoked; the Bill of Rights must be misrepresented with persuasive propaganda from the most trusted sources. The entire deceptive operation must appear to benefit the masses. It must be shrewdly executed with focused determination or the populace may awaken and revolt. 

The religious persecution that drove settlers from Europe to the British North American colonies sprang from the conviction, held by Protestants and Catholics alike, that uniformity of religion must exist in any given society. This conviction rested on the belief that there was one true religion and that it was the duty of the civil authorities to impose it, forcibly if necessary, in the interest of saving the souls of all citizens. [1] 

Religious intolerance and persecution is rampant in many countries. Because of the religious intolerance directed at my own ancestors I am adamant about separation of church and state. Religious reformer John Rogers, a distant but direct ancestor (11th great grandfather), was burned at the stake on February 4, 1555 at Smithfield, near Warwick, Nottinghamshire, England during the reign of Mary Tudor. He was a close associate of William Tyndale and an editor of the “Matthew Bible.” Rogers was the first British Protestant martyr under Queen Mary. “On the Monday morning of his death, the Sheriff had shown Rogers a document promising pardon if he would recant. ‘That which I have preached with my lips will I seal with my blood,’ was the answer.” [2] 

The Constitution established our federal government. That document is a two way agreement; it is every citizen’s social contract with their government. Accordingly, all of our rights are protected – except the ones we willingly give up. Driven by government-provoked fear, we frequently give up sovereignty for alleged security. We are relinquishing, little by little, our God-given freedoms and will eventually wake up enslaved in a tyrannical, controlling state. 

Mass persuasion by public officials, news commentators, teachers and some church leaders falsely claim that we live in a democracy rather than a republic. Some of those same individuals claim that “separation of church and state” is not a constitutional concept. Repetitive lies, accepted as fact, soon gain acceptance by those who fail to read the available documents. “The most brilliant propagandist technique will yield no success unless one fundamental principle is borne in mind constantly… it must confine itself to a few points and repeat them over and over.”— Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Propaganda Minister. 

Individual rights were completely absent from the first draft of the Constitution. “Unless assured that a bill of rights would be passed, many states threatened to withhold ratification of the Constitution. Consequently, in 1789, the First Congress of the United States adopted the first ten amendments to the Constitution, known collectively as the Bill of Rights. Ratification of these amendments by the required number of states occurred in 1791.” [3]  

First Amendment: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” 

Madison’s first draft of the First Amendment read: “The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretence, infringed.” [4] It is highly significant that religion, of all the liberties embodied in the Bill of Rights, is the very first freedom mentioned. The First Amendment, possibly the most important in the Bill of Rights, enumerates five freedoms: religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. Those God-given freedoms facilitate individual participation in the process of self-government. 

The Bill of Rights pertains to and was designed to protect the individual rights of each and every person. The specific tenets of the Bill of Rights were not rights granted to the government, an artificial body created by the citizens. The right of “free exercise” pertains to individuals, not to government. Therefore, a government entity or any person representing that entity cannot claim or seize “free exercise.” The “free exercise” of an individual’s religion, not the government’s religion, is constitutional. Consequently, a government employee may not constitutionally direct any type of religious observance while functioning in that government-sponsored occupation. 

The Religious Right and their minions endorse their versions of school prayer. My children attended school to study math, grammar, penmanship, history, biology, science, and to enhance their already developed reading skills. I did not send them to school to learn to pray. We pray regularly in our home and at church. Citizens should not be obligated to pay taxes for students to learn how to pray. Given America’s diversity, what kind of a prayer would it be: Catholic, Baptist, Seventh-day Adventist, Episcopalian, Jewish, Methodist, Mormon? Which students are going to feel discomfort or suffer mild to aggressive persecution for not being the “right” religion? Will the students who belong to the “right” religion feel compelled to openly pray for the “sinful” student – to save his or her soul from hell? Governments should not sponsor any activity that contributes or provokes persecution or aggression towards others based on religion or ethnicity. 

“The Establishment Clause thus stands as an expression of principle on the part of the founders of our Constitution that religion is too personal, too sacred, too holy, to permit its ‘unhallowed perversion’ by a civil magistrate. Another purpose of the Establishment Clause rested upon an awareness of the historical fact that governmentally established religions and religious persecutions go hand in hand.” [5] 

Thomas Jefferson stated: “No provision in our Constitution ought to be dearer to man than that which protects the rights of conscience against the enterprises of the civil authority.” 

Despite the intentionally secular foundation of the constitution, there have been and will continue to be controversial court cases, many perpetuated by stables of high-priced attorneys retained by different factions of the Religious Right to publicize the questionable premise that America’s Christians are consistently persecuted. The actual objective of such lawsuits is to outrage the voters who will then demand specific religious freedoms even if it means incremental loss of religious freedoms or discrimination for others. The very people who should make every effort to protect religious freedom are, in fact, jeopardizing it. 

In colonial times, many European monarchs referred to their nations as Christian countries. However, sinners and hypocrites comprised the bulk of their local populace. Nations, like people, are defined by their national character and moral fortitude. To the colonial, Roger Williams, residency in a particular place did not equate to Christianity. [6] Likewise, given our duplicitous propensity for class discrimination, abortion, offensive war, the economic destabilization of other countries and deathly sanctions, referring to America as a Christian nation casts super serious doubt upon our interpretation of a Christian. 

Many, particularly in the Religious Right, claim that the United States was established as a Christian nation rather than a free nation. They perpetuate this erroneous theory in order to attract other morally upright people who might naïvely embrace the Religious Right’s spurious agenda. However, to appeal to others, they downplay the word “Christian” and include others they may have previously attempted to discredit as non Christian. “By referring more ecumenically to the United States as a religious nation, they invite other religious traditions to join a family-values crusade launched originally by a particular form of Christian faith.” … “A shift in rhetorical strategy to widen political appeal does not affect the substantive issues at stake.” [7] 

Every decent person is for “family values” but not through government enforcement. People who endorse separation of church and state do not hate religion! Justifiable objections arise when some “Christian leaders” demand that their particular version of religion be incorporated into the nation’s laws.  

In every age, religious advocates have attempted to influence others through government enforcement. Individuals seeking political office frequently use religion to draw support from the religious community. Campaign customs have significantly changed in the last four to five decades. Candidates discuss ideology instead of specific political issues that detrimentally affect every single citizen. View one of John F. Kennedy’s campaign speeches and then evaluate contemporary candidate rhetoric – it is a night and day difference. 

The founding fathers had respect for religion and it is because of that respect that they resisted some of the religious leaders of the day and refrained from merging the operations of government with religion. To serve Dominionist goals, it is relatively easy to harvest ambiguous quotes from the founders that appear to endorse the merging of church and state. There are sufficient public examples that history revisionists use to “prove” that religion and politics are compatible. 

The phrase “In God we trust” is on our money as a result of the pressure and ranting of Horace Bushnell, a Connecticut preacher, who said that the Civil War was “divine retribution” for America’s acceptance of “speculative and infidel” ideas that government was not ordained by God. It is a blasphemous insult to put God’s very name on worthless paper printed by the international bankers who hijacked our economy and are currently draining America’s resources. The majority of people may actually trust money and the power it gives more than they trust God. In today’s corrupt climate, anyone can literally “buy anything in the world for money” and it is outrageous to attach God’s name to filthy lucre, made filthier by the mass destruction that it causes in the hands of those who seek total control. 

“Render, therefore, to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s.” –Mark 13:17 and Luke 20:25 

Blaming Lincoln’s war of northern aggression on infidels is akin to some current religious leaders who claim that 9/11 is the result of our country’s homosexual tolerance. Falwell remarked: “I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the ACLU, People For the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America. I point the finger in their face and say ‘you helped this happen.’” [8] How discomforting that some religious leaders, who have similar, though secret lifestyles, reject individuals and dispel them from their midst rather than inviting everyone into their realm in order to love and teach them. Isn’t it time that we separate church and hate. What happened to true worship – emulation? 

Perhaps Falwell’s apology was insincere considering that he continues to define others in negative terms such as being anti-Christ. This “Christian” preacher’s unabashed comments are regularly heard in the “conservative,” administration-friendly media. [9] This is so radically different from his methodology before he combined his abilities with those who spearheaded the most current assault on the religious clauses within the First Amendment. 

The suddenly star-struck Falwell was a typical preacher who understood the gospel process up until his merger with the ultra conservative New Right. Falwell said the following during the civil rights movement of the 1960s: “We have a message of redeeming grace through a crucified and risen Lord. Nowhere are we told to reform the externals. We are not told to wage a war against bootleggers, liquor stores, gamblers, murderers, prostitutes, racketeers, prejudiced persons or institutions, or any other existing evil as such. The gospel does not clean up the outside but rather regenerates the inside.” [10] 

Changing society begins with changing oneself. Religious practitioners need to address the individuals in their congregations – that is their job. The churches must get back to doing what they are supposed to do – not lobby government officials to instill additional mountains of repressive, bigoted regulations designed to disenfranchise certain groups and strip others of their individual freedoms. That is hardly moral or just. Morality, especially from an apparently immoral human entity like the government, cannot come from the top down. It will deliver quite the opposite. 

Many prefer fast food religion rather than repentance and “feasting upon the word of God.” Repentance changes hearts which then results in better behavior including a desire to bury the weapons of war, support peace and view one’s alleged enemies in a completely different light. Good behavior as a result of government enforcement, a function that many want the government to assume, does not impact the heart and soul. 

Personally, I would not entrust a government that kills the citizens of weaker countries with the task of saving my soul. Nor would I trust the very vocal religious practitioners who support such senseless slaughter. It appears that many individuals, including religious leaders, have created the “Uncle Sam” golden calf. Rather than self-reliance, a by-product of accepting responsibility and repenting for one’s own behavior, many rely upon “Uncle Sam” to solve every dilemma or enforce better behavior. It is all a diabolical deception to strip us all of our free agency and the very ideals and principles we cherish. 

Go to Part 19 

[4] 1 Annals of Congress 434 (June 8, 1789)

[5] Engel vs. Vitale, US Supreme Court, Decided June 25, 1962, Hugo Lafayette Black, Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court

[6] The Godless Constitution, the Case Against Religious Correctness by Isaac Kramnick & R. Laurence Moore, p. 51

[7] Ibid, p. 13

[10] Jerry Falwell, as quoted in Jerome L. Himmelstein, To the Right, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1990, p. 118 as quoted in Blinded by Might, Can the religious Right Save America? By Cal Thomas and Ed Dobson, p. 85


To avoid attracting spam email robots, email addresses on this site are written with AT in place of the usual symbol. Replace AT with the correct symbol to get a valid address.

Back To Political Points

 © Deanna Spingola 2006 – All rights reserved

Deanna Spingola’s articles are copyrighted but may be republished, reposted, or emailed. However, the person or organization must not charge for subscriptions or advertising. The article must be copied intact and full credit given. Deanna’s web site address must also be included.

Who Killed Christ? The Romans or the Jews?

April 26, 2011

Who Killed Christ? The Romans or the Jews?

By Richard Edmondson

Day after tomorrow is the Christian holiday “Good Friday.” People all around the world will be reflecting upon the life—and death—of what arguably was one of the greatest spiritual teachers that ever lived. In a post several days ago, I argued that one of Christ’s most basic and fundamental teachings was the equality of all peoples—and that in the final years of his life he went about preaching this message amongst a population that was virulently racist and convinced of its own “chosenness.” (see Jewish Racism: Some Thoughts on Palm Sunday ) I also argued that the racism of the Jews of the first century seems to perpetuate itself in the framework of a number of extremely racist rabbis that we see in Israel today, and I gave examples of such.

In response, a reader posted a comment pointing out that Pontius Pilate, the governor of Judea at the time, was a cruel individual. This in fact is correct. In a letter to the Emperor Caligula, Agrippa I called Pilate a purveyor of “graft, insults, robberies, assaults, wanton abuse, constant executions without trial, unending grievous cruelty.” In evaluating this letter, it’s important to keep in mind that Agrippa was a highly ambitious man who had a history of backstabbing his own benefactors, and that he eventually managed to have himself named “king” over most of Israel and was awarded dominion over Pilate’s former territory in the process. Nonetheless, there is likely to be a certain amount of truth to what he says. But, and this is very important to keep in mind, Pilate’s brutality is not the only issue to be considered. At least as important, if not more so, is Jewish racism.

Jesus had a message, a very important one: that we are all equal in the eyes of God. It is a message that resonated with a good many Jews, who in fact became his followers; yet it also clearly aroused many other Jews to fury. Parables like that of the “Good Samaritan” were a sacrilege to such Jews, for it violated their sense of being “God’s chosen.” This fury, this outrage, must be evaluated when we examine the events which led to Christ’s death. To fail to take it into consideration is to close one’s eyes to the full picture. Yet in debates on the matter, the racism factor is often excluded from discussion. Take the YouTube video here, for example. In addition to making a number of plainly false statements, the blusterous rabbi that we see in the clip waxes at considerable length on Pilate’s despotism…while acknowledging not even word number 1 about Jewish racism.

So how did Pilate end up being portrayed in the gospels as a mostly-benevolent buck passer? In answering this, we have to keep in mind that Rome was the imperial occupation power. Nobody, but nobody, wanted to get on their bad side. Telling the story of the crucifixion and the Roman governor’s role in it would have been a dicey proposition, and no doubt the gospel writers were acutely aware of this. My own take on the execution of Jesus is that it was instigated by Pilate, with the willing cooperation of the Jewish collaborators on the Sanhedrin. Both Pilate and the Sanhedrin would have viewed Jesus as a threat because of his large following. And his following was quite large. At the same time, however, by preaching equality instead of chosenness, Jesus made numerous enemies. This is abundantly clear, and the depiction in the gospels of large crowds of Jews standing upon the paved Gabbatha cheering and applauding the decision to crucify him is probably for the most part accurate. So who killed Jesus, the Romans or the Jews? In my view, while Pilate played a key, perhaps even pivotal, role, large numbers of Jews also bore an enormous share of the responsibility. The critical factor here was Jewish racism, the sense of  “chosenness.”

It is this same racism that we see perpetuating the conflict in the Middle East today.

Jewish and Muslim Easter Bunnies and Eggs

April 24, 2011

Easter is Christendom’s most holiest day, surpassing even Christmas. In the Philippines, even the whore houses close down for Easter.

So have you ever wondered why the Zionist elite—the owners of the military-industrial complex who control all governments and establishment media—promote bunnies and eggs to represent Easter? Do bunnies represent Christ’s death and resurrection for all peoples? Is it coincidence that elitists of so-called “Earth Day” decide to use Good Friday? In my view, it is to distract from the message of universal hope that Christianity offers.

Why don’t Christians speak out? Are we afraid of being called anti-this or anti-that? What if Christians used bunnies and eggs to represent the Jewish and Muslim religions? Would their followers remain quiet? We know the answer.

Remember, bunnies and eggs do not represent the Easter message.

Don’t Call Glenn Beck A Martyr

April 16, 2011

Don’t Call Glenn Beck A Martyr

by Hugh Akins

       News of the firing of Fox superstar-icon Glenn Beck is being received by unthinking Catholics, Christians and patriots as the greatest moral outrage since 9/11.  “This poor persecuted patriot.”  “So hated by the Jews.”  “A genuine martyr for the cause of freedom.”  “A real American hero.”

      These are some of the things good people are actually saying about ZIONIST/ISRAEL-FIRST Glenn Beck.  Unable to spare the time to set the record straight and prove beyond all doubt that Mr. Beck is none of those things which good people think he is, but rather a total fraud, the next best thing is to share with you the following thoughts which were taken from my forthcoming book, Synagogue Rising.   It was in that book that I had the audacity to suggest that Glenn Beck was one of the enemy’s “useful idiots” who, far from being a true conservative, is nothing more than “A PHONY USURPER OF THE FREEDOM MOVEMENT,” A ZIONIST COURT JESTER AND A TOP CANDIDATE FOR THE NEXT “MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN AMERICA” TITLE.

      I also predicted that Fox News would eventually fire him and that his Zionist handlers would subsequently make a martyr out of him, furthering their evil cause.

      The following is taken verbatim from the soon-to-be-released Synagogue Rising.

       The master manipulators once again get the dumbed-down American public to fall for yet another of their mass-deceptions as part of a meticulously engineered psychological warfare campaign against the simple-minded goyim. 

      The television addict who foolishly permits the likes of Glenn Beck to poison his/her thinking is certain to remain misinformed, confused and cemented in Rabbinic lies, even while believing they have all the answers and remedies for all the wrongs in the world.  Such massive mind-conditioning is frightening.   

      Recently, part of our research for this book became part of a self-imposed penance for Lent.  It turned out to be the most PAINFUL penance we could possibly inflict on our person.  We subjected ourself to the exceedingly unpleasant task of sitting through a Glenn Beck TV presentation for the first – and we assure you – last time.  More than “unpleasant,” the experience was downright revolting.  Rarely, even after many long years on the front lines, have we encountered such a display of mindless babble, of intellectually drunken sophistry, of blatant deception, of emotion-charged propaganda, of outright treason disguised as patriotism.  So deliriously insane is this comedian-propagandist of the Zionist right that we cannot help but agree with certain liberals that label him “Fox News’s paranoid superstar demagogue.” [1]

      For all the talk about the New World Order, Glenn Beck is one of its most energetic and effective facilitators.  How so?  One reason: he’s a fanatic warhawk for Israel.  Nothing is driving the world faster into the Judaized New World Order than the aggressive and genocidal wars we are fighting for Israel.

      The reason this wholly Judaized court-jester is given so much coverage in the Jewish-controlled media – Fox is no less Zionist than all the other purveyors of disinformation – is because he is one of them, notwithstanding all the impassioned claims to the contrary.  A Mormon by creed, Beck is therefore linked to Talmudic Freemasonry, which is and has always been under Judaic inspiration and control.  With an estimated 2-3 million viewers per night, the “king of conservative porn” would not be in the national spotlight and raking in millions of dollars from misinformed conservatives from coast-to-coast if he were nearly as true-blue conservative and anti-Big Government as he makes himself out to be. 

      If there was anything we might agree on with the radically subversive hate-peddlers of the Southern Poverty law Center (SPLC), it’s their concern regarding the upsurge in new “patriot” organizations in the past year.  In its March 2, 2010 report, “Rage on the Right: The Year In Hate & Extremism,” we learn that “an astonishing 363 new patriot groups appeared in 2009, with the totals going from 149 groups (including 42 militias) the year before to 512 (127 of them militias) – a 244% jump.” [2]

      Why should true patriots be alarmed over this development?  Because the majority of these newly formed groups are part of the controlled opposition, intentional or otherwise. Like Fox News and Glenn Beck, their mission is to deceive, divert, discredit, demonize – in a word, neutralize – moral-minded citizens who would otherwise stand against the Rabbinic Tyranny that is right now fastening the final chains about the American people.

      Conservative-minded middle America must wake up.  Glenn Beck is more than just the leading conservative “class clown” or “court jester;” GLENN BECK, LET US REPEAT AND RE-EMPHASIZE, IS AN UNYIELDING ZIONIST.  His phenomenal commercial success is due to this one fact alone.  He is fond of saying that he’s not going to treat his audience like morons, but this is exactly what he does. EXACTLY! “Truth has no agenda,” he sanctimoniously grandstands.  “Obama has an agenda…the left has an agenda… the media has an agenda…” He loves to rant and rage in self-righteous indignation, but certainly not him.  He emphatically disclaims having any agenda of his own.  No one owns him.  No one has claimed his soul.  He is the populist Moses-come-down-from-the-mountain-after-seeing-the-face-of-God to lead the chosen people of the right (Fox viewers) to the promised land of a restored America – a renewed Jeffersonian/Freemasonic/ Constitutional republicanism.  His only agenda, he would have all his cheering and worshipful fans accept, is to speak the truth, to expose evil (all those who repudiate the Zionist party line), to save America from “Obammunism,” and to re-open the gates of heaven for all who tune in to Fox News and genuflect before HIM.  It’s the gospel according to Glenn Beck.  And, God save us, there are many conservative and traditional Catholics and other patriots who make up no small part of the Glen Beck Fan Club.  

      Well, you can be sure that Mr. Beck and Fox TV have a far different agenda than what those who’ve become hypnotized by all their lies hold to be true.  Their agenda is ISRAEL’S agenda, it’s quite simple and quite obvious.  And on the top of the list is the rabid push for war with Iran and more support for Israel and an ever escalating war on terror on Israel’s behalf. Make no mistake about it.  This high-strung and pompous con-artist, comedian, showman, pseudo-conservative is no Moses, but no less a Mossad asset than Abe Foxman of the ADL is a Mossad agent, only less conspicuously so.  And because the fact is more cleverly disguised, he is the more effective and hence the more dangerous traitor. At least Foxman is honest enough to openly stand for anti-Christian Talmudism.  Beck is the greater deceiver whose task is to lead the whole of conservative/moderate-liberal middle America into the Zionist camp under the pretext of defending American and Israeli democracy and standing against Marxist and Islamic militancy. 

      Watch carefully – the process has already begun – as Tea Party conservatism is progressively assimilated into Ronald Reagan conservatism via the grand deception of Glenn Beck conservatism.  Interestingly enough, it takes a liberal to see Beck for what he really is. Kevin Drum writes for the far-left Mother Jones consortium.  Here’s what he says in part: “Glenn Beck is, for a liberal like me, far more entertaining to watch than, say, Sean Hannity or Bill O’Riley.  The latter are garden variety blowhards and their subject matter is predictable.  But Beck?  He’s crazy!  He thinks the Muslim Brotherhood is going to take over the entire Mediterranean!  Fabian socialists are a fifth column working to subvert everything that makes America great! (But slowly, sneakily.)  The Tides Foundation is on a mission to ‘warp your children’s brains’!  And Obama the secret Marxist is behind it all!  It all fits together!

      “This is actually sort of entertaining in small doses.  But in bigger doses, not so much.”[3]     

      The scam consists of a vast media effort, the left collaborating with the right as always, to project Glenn Beck as a persecuted enemy of the liberal establishment rather than an invaluable stooge of that same Talmudic establishment’s Grand Design for America and the world.  Even the Jews, whom Beck serves with undying loyalty, criticize him in public in order to maintain the deception (as they now do with Obama).  By portaying His Lordship Mr. Beck in this light, as an anti-Semite, he is lionized as a martyr/hero for “the cause” which is certain to galvanize more support for him and therefore secretly for International Jewry’s anti-Christian conspiracy.  This is exactly what is happening.  Michael Hoffman explains:

      “Glenn Beck couldn’t be more of a slave of the Talmudic mentality if he wore a kippah (skullcap) and carried a copy of the Talmud Bavli onto the Fox News set.  He follows their script 99% of the time.  But it’s that one percent of independence that troubles any slave-master.

      “(1) Beck is not supposed to use ‘Holocaust’ parallels.  ‘Holocaust’ is a trademark of the Master Race of Holy People and they have a proprietary relationship with it.  (2) Beck cannot criticize any certified ‘Holocaust’ saint.  St. George Soros is one such Holy Person.

      “For these two minor infractions the master chess players take the opportunity to be seen as highly critical of their shabbos goy, Mister Beck.  He is portrayed as another ‘Father Coughlin,’ the peace campaigner and social justice worker who so annoyed the usual suspects in the 1930s.  Beck is no Coughlin.  The comparison is laughable.  Beck [is PRO-war not antiwar as was Fr. Coughlin.  Beck too] hates the social justice campaign against usury.  His economic heroine is the greed-is-good Russian Khazar, Ayn Rand.  But leave it to the Talmudic mentality to stretch the bounds of credulity with their delusion.

      “Watch the pea under the shell: with this controversy, Zionists show themselves as independent of Beck and Beck gets to appear as a thorn in the side of Zionism – even though Beck is a fervent war-Zionist who doesn’t just kiss Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s feet, he kisses each of his toes…Watch for ‘useful idiots’ in the right wing start to refer to Beck as being ‘courageous as Father Coughlin’ and someone who is beginning to wake up about the ‘Jews.’” [4]  

      We predicted months ago that Beck may well get “fired” by Fox to really dramatize the “persecuted martyr” false image.  Now that Beck’s termination with Fox has been made official, we may well see him take a more active role in the Tea Party movement, making more public appearances, giving more public talks to standing ovations of unthinking masses who actually believe him an independent and a voice of traditional conservatism.  We recently saw a similar tactic employed in the termination of Keith Olbermann from MSNBC, who is said to be Beck’s counterpart on the left.  Right, left, centrist, Beck, Olbermann – they’re all on the same side: the side of the Elders of Zion, Masters of America and the world.         

      An article titled “Glenn Beck the Socialist” [5] does a poor job of exposing his Rabbinic, socialist, statist, Big Government proclivity, [6] no matter how much rhetoric is spent focusing on the opposite.  But it does speak a single truth in observing that some folks “view him as a phony usurper of the freedom movement.”  He is exactly, emphatically that.  

      In the months leading up to the 2008 presidential elections Beck was heard on nationwide television naming candidate McCain as his personal preference.  Not Dr. Ron Paul, mind you; not Dr. Chuck Baldwin – either of whom would have been the proper choice if Beck really believed all the conservative verbiage that comes out of his mouth in an endless torrent of lies and deception.  But Sen. John McCain, the least conservative, most radical candidate who has been described as “the most dangerous man in America” by Chronicles magazine (America would most likely already be engaged in a nuclear war in the Middle East had McCain been elected president)?   You can’t get any more socialist, statist, internationalist and Zionist than that without having openly favored Barack Obama or Hilary Clinton for president.  And if we are not mistaken, Mr. Beck has indicated Sarah Palin as his first choice in the up-coming 2012 elections; Yes, Sarah Palin, darling of the Israel-First, Zionism-right-or-wrong crowd.

      For those who do not have their head buried in the sand, ostrich-like, Mr. Beck is as predictable as the rotation of dawn and dusk. Yet Beck’s rhetoric is always for less government intrusion in our lives, less federal regulations in the market, less state encroachments upon our liberties, less cultural and political communism, less Islamism…he will even throw in a word or two about God for all the religious fanatics among his vast throng of wide-eyed devotees.  Truly the man is a “saint,” is he not?

      His defenders are quick to point out that he has invited on his show such genuine patriots as Dr. Ron Paul and G. Edward Griffin.  This, we assert, is only to keep up the masquerade that he himself is a principled and leading conservative who can be trusted.  But a closer look betrays a horse of an altogether  different color. 

      He is certainly brilliantly cunning in the way he will manipulate the few genuine conservatives on his program; most cunning in the way he, not his guests, will direct and dominate the dialogue, in the way he will allow certain truths to be disclosed only to totally dismiss them in drawing his typically false conclusions, in the way he will permit the discussion to go only so far before he will cut off his guests from speaking of the real issues, the real dangers, the real culprits, the real answers to our nation’s greatest ills. 

      Glenn Beck can be counted on to avoid, whitewash or misrepresent the truth.  We read that, in the same show which featured Mr. Griffin, expert on the Federal Reserve and author of the most comprehensive expose on the Fed ever produced, The Creature from Jekyll Island, Beck did most of the talking and Griffin could hardly get a word in.  Beck reportedly mocked the idea that a Rothschild conspiracy was behind the secret founding of America’s Central Bank, which is essentially a money monopoly of which Beck’s Fox sponsor is a witting player, and that behind the Rothschild Empire was a vast International Crime Syndicate of Rabbinic anti-Christianism, all of which is a matter of historical fact.   Glenn Beck will attack George Soros, a Kissinger-type villain that everone loves to hate and which the Powers that Be permit to be villainized and hated, but never will Mr. Beck even whisper an unfavorable word about the Cryptocracy’s far more powerful Insiders at B’nai B’rith, the ADL, Chabad Lubavitch, the OTO, in short, not a single negative word about those hardline anti-Christian Talmudists that sit at the helm of Political, Financial and Ecclesial Power that rules America and the world.

       How is this systematic disinformation and cover-up of the facts not complete and utter treason on the part of media superstars like Glen Beck?  How is this not the charades of a shrewd and cunning master deceiver, and a Zionist wolf in sheep’s clothing? 

      This is the same Glenn Beck who practically single-handedly snatched hold of the initial Tea Party movement, which had some sincere patriots and noble intentions propelling it, and turned a huge part of it into just another false alternative to the bipartisan status quo Judeo-Masonic establishment.  For all these reasons combined, and given the power he and Fox News seem to hold over the minds of countless millions of basically honest but absolutely conned patriotic Americans, Mr. Beck himself may well become the next “most dangerous man in America.”  We cringe at the thought of how many traditional Catholics have been beguiled and played for a fool by this pied piper of crypto-Judaic Totalitarianism disguised as anti-Obama, Star-Spangled, Motherhood-and-Apple-Pie American Conservatism.

      Dear friends, Glenn Beck’s mission, we cannot stress it enough, is to make true conservatives a laughing-stock, thereby undermining the moral and religious foundations upon which true conservativism is built.   A Judaic “useful idiot” if ever there was one, Mr. Beck is to be considered extremely delusional in his self-adulation and exceedingly dangerous in the extent of his influence and of his disinformation. 

* * * * * *

We have much more to say about Sarah Palin, the Tea Party movement, the new up-coming Zionist “No Labels” third party controlled opposition to the two-party Zionist syndicate, neocons – false patriots and psychopathic warmongers, phony Christians who parrot the Zionist party line, etc.  You’ll have to purchase a copy of Synagogue Rising to read the rest. 

If you liked what you read above; if you see the importance of the book it was excerpted from, perhaps you will see fit to help us get this book published.  It is 99.5% completed. Besides a few last-minute finishing touches, all we need now are the funds to take it to print.  If you think this book has merit and is important, perhaps you will send us the most generous donation you can to help get it printed, bound, advertised and widely distributed. Getting this book into the hands of many good people is as much to your advantage as it is to ours.  None of us are immune from the menace of crypto-Judaic Totalitarianism which is swiftly descending upon us all.

 PayPal online to  Checks, money orders to CTC Books P.O. Box 678047, Orlando FL 32867. 

 Thank you and God bless,

Hugh Akins, author.

League of Christ the King, SSPX

[1] David Corn of, quoted in “Beck’s Extremism: A Conservative Dilemma,” The Week,March 11, 2011. 

[2] “Meet the Patriots – A ‘Patriot’ Movement Timeline,”, April, 2010. 

[3] Kevin Drum, “Standing Up To Glenn Beck,”, Feb. 11, 2011. 

[4] Michael Hoffman commenting on a message from Jewish Funds for Justice President Simon Greer, The Hoffman Wire,, Nov. 19, 2010. 

[5] Phil Maymin, “Glenn Beck the Socialist,”, Sept. 16, 2010. 

[6] How exactly is Glenn Beck a propenent of Big Government socialism?  By answering this question you will have your answer: “Does he or does he not crusade against such unconstitutional bureaucratic monstrosities as Homeland Security, FEMA, the Fed, IRS, ATF, CIA, NSA, DEA, FDA, DoD, DoE, EPA…?”

What Christians Don’t Want to Know About Israel

April 11, 2011

This article, written in 1998 by Christian journalist Grace Halsell, is even more relevant today. Maybe the title ought to be changed to “What Christians don’t want to know about Israel.” Check it out.

%d bloggers like this: