Christian Zionism as a Parasitic Ideology

February 16, 2021

February 6, 2021/48 Comments/in Christian ZionismFeatured Articles /by Andrew Joyce, Ph.D.

With Trump out of office, now would be a good time to critically re-examine one of the most remarkable, and ultimately problematic, features of his time as President — the extravagant support he enjoyed from evangelical Christians and the resurgence of Christian Zionism. Back in November, I linked Trump’s popularity among Red State Christians to “the power of personality,” which really only told half the story, and, even then, quite weakly. The mystery of why a huge block of ostensibly conservative voters would back such a materialistic, crass, irreligious, and vulgar man, who has done more than anyone in recent memory to export what E. Michael Jones has so aptly termed “the Gay Disco,” cried out for further explanation. This explanation surely isn’t to be found in his immigration-based reforms, which were abysmal and quickly-reversed failures. The real reason for his enduring and almost-spiritual adulation is, of course, found in Christian Zionism, and Trump’s Presidency, more than any other in recent memory, could be aptly characterized as the most flamboyantly Christian Zionist in living memory.

Dr. Joyce’s article continues here. It’s quite a lengthy analysis of Christian Zionism and how the Zionists promoted Donald Trump to the appeal of war-mongering Christian Zionists.

Don’t forget to read the many comments at the end of the article. The discussion is very good and there’s lots of information to read.


Latest Middle East War Scheme Revealed

January 2, 2020

 

One mercenary’s death is used to force new wars upon Iraq, Iran and Syria. The US political leadership demonstrates what Christmas is not about, by bombing several sites over the holidays. Reportedly the U/S killed 19 Iranians and Syrians, wounding some 50 on the last, sad days of 2019. How many of those killed were civilians is not disclosed.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo let us know the Arabs had it coming, having killed an “American contractor” three days prior.  He stated, “the strikes send the message that the US will not tolerate actions by Iraq that jeopardize American lives.”

A spokesman for the Iraqi government claimed that top officials had “pleaded with the United States”not to go ahead with the threatened Sunday night airstrikes. But to no avail.

Associated Press reported that three days later, on Dec 31, Iraqi protesters burned property in front of the US Embassy compound in Baghdad, Iraq.

“Dozens of angry Iraqi Shiite militia supporters broke into the US Embassy compound in Baghdad on Tuesday after smashing the central door and setting fire to a reception area, prompting tear gas and sounds of gunfire. There were no reports of casualties.”

US Press, from the New York Times to the Nashville Democrat, have all reported on the bombings and the follow-up assault on the US Embassy, but this author has yet to see anybody raise two vital questions:

First question: Why does the US military attack a country where we maintain an actively staffed embassy? Is not our embassy a symbol of peace and cooperation? What can be the motives of politicians who direct military raids that kill dozens in a country with whom we have diplomatic relations? Is this a scheme to force new wars?

Second question: We are told the US deadly military raids were in response to Iraq killing a single American “military contractor.” But Is a “contractor” in fact a war mercenary, hired by a private company, and paid to carry out often questionable legal acts?

Our President tweeted that he will “protect all Americans.” Should this include mercenary warriors on unknown missions paid by private companies, many of which companies are weapon makers? And is not the purpose of “contractors” to carry out clandestine, politically questionable tasks, some that US military would not or could not legally do? The individual’s name has not been released, nor has the contracting company and its mission when he was killed!

We are correct in calling this unnamed warrior a “mercenary”. Our Secretary of State and President are using this contractor’s death as the latest but weakest excuse for a new war with Iraq, Iran and Syria. He has yet to be named, nor have we been told the circumstances of his death, how much he was paid, what his orders were, and who issued them. It is unlikely we ever will.

His employer is not required to tell us what he was doing or why. But we ask, why do we taxpayers pay contractors more money to do secret jobs in undeclared wars than we pay our own Marines? Because they carry out the political agenda of our President and others!

Only The Atlantic took note of the push for war. Use of mercenaries is not an isolated case; it is the norm against the oils rich Middle East. Atlantic points out that, as of June 2011, 554 private contractors died in the first Iraq war. And of those 254 were Americans and 59 Britons.

Contractors hire former military-trained Americans, who become mercenaries, flying below the radar of accountability under the US military code of conduct. No wonder it is so easy to get into the wars. Leaders, including our present administration, have for years privately agitated for war that results in slaughter of victims, using excuses like this one.

The US President has already ordered 14,000 Marines be dispatched (at taxpayer expense) to Iraq because of the minor breach of security (no injuries) at the US Embassy

We Hold These Truths has always taught that war is a business, maintained by those who profit from it. War must be hidden from us less we revolt! This is why the mercenary military is such a big, secret part of creating endless wars. US Marine Corp Major General Smedley Butler said it best when he wrote “War is a racket.”


Christian War Fever

August 23, 2018

Published: Thursday, August 23, 2018

By Dr. Chuck Baldwin

As I said in a previous column, Donald Trump’s appointments of John Bolton as National Security Advisor, Gina Haspel as CIA Director, Mike Pompeo as Secretary of State and Nikki Haley as the U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. are the formation of a full-fledged War Cabinet. The signs are ubiquitous that Trump plans to take America to war against Iran and Syria in much the same way that G.W. Bush took us to war against Iraq and Afghanistan. All it will take is another false flag attack that can be blamed on Iran.

And now that Trump is up to his eyeballs in legal trouble as an unindicted co-conspirator in ordering his then attorney Michael Cohen to pay hush money to two women Trump had committed adultery with in order to pay for their silence during his campaign for President in 2016, the likelihood that Trump will attack Iran and Syria as a means of taking attention away from his legal troubles grows exponentially. This is a favorite tactic of presidents who are embroiled in serious scandals. Can anyone say Bill Clinton? And here’s the thing: The more war that Trump (or any Republican President) wages around the world, the more evangelical pastors and Christians love him.

Continued here.


Former Dispensational Christian Explains America’s Moral Decline

January 9, 2018

First appeared here:

Unless you understand how and why some 50 million “Christians” worship Zionist Israel, there is no way to understand how Donald Trump could swing 81% of the so called Evangelical Christian vote, and maintain himself in their good graces in spite of his secular life and words.

Pastor Chuck Baldwin explains in:  The Focus Of My Labor In 2018

He states “The only hope for the restoration of liberty in America lies in,  repudiation of Scofield dispensationalism, the false futurist interpretation of Bible prophecy, and Israel-First ideology. Believe it or not, Christian support for Zionism and a gross misinterpretation of the Biblical teaching of Israel are the underlying causes of the massive deterioration of America’s Christian culture as well as the catalysts for globalism, the Warfare State, and the rise of political neoconism.”

Pastor Baldwin lists the other two “hopes” as found in America’s founding documents, and a return to “Reformation preaching as once exhibited in the pulpits of Colonial America.” We  hope you will read his inspiring story.

In it Baldwin further asserts :

“But dispensationalism exploded into prominence when the Rothschild banking cartel created the Zionist State of Israel on May 14, 1948. Since that time, virtually every Baptist, Pentecostal, Assemblies of God, and charismatic church and most “Bible” churches enthusiastically and ubiquitously promote dispensationalism as absolute Bible doctrine and the Zionist State of Israel as the absolute fulfillment of the Abrahamic Covenant.”

And: “I grew up in dispensationalism; I went to dispensationalist Bible colleges; and I taught dispensationalism for over thirty years. My very first Bible as an adult was a Scofield Reference Bible (which I still have). Some of the most well-known fundamentalist preachers of the twentieth century have their signatures in that Bible—men such as W.A. Criswell, B.R. Lakin, Tom Malone, John R. Rice, Monroe Parker, J. Vernon McGee, J. Harold Smith, Jack Hyles, Jerry Falwell, and others. My theological schooling was entirely rooted in dispensationalism.”

Watch We Hold These Truths’ next story which will deal with our very simple slant on the dramatic economic changes we are seeing, from the stock market runaway to the federal debt crises, and the Bitcoin blackmail.- Editor CEC


Would Jesus Vote For Donald Trump?

December 17, 2017

Armageddon? Bring It On:

The Evangelical Force Behind Trump’s Jerusalem Speech

Editor Charles Carlson observes: This cryptic account of how Donald Trump has used the so-called ‘religious right’ to carry out his own agenda, is from none other than Haaretz, perhaps Israel’s leading news publication.  The authors are laughing up their sleeve that we Americans can be led by the likes of Donald Trump and his critical “theological” support base of some 60 million who really do believe what Haaretz finds to be so strange.  We will not live in peace, nor will the rest of the world until these well-meaning zealots recognize themselves as victims of a crackpot religious hodgepodge that calls itself Christian Zionism. – Editor CEC

Haaretz writes: “The U.S. evangelical community is in raptures over Trump’s decision to declare Jerusalem the capital of Israel, believing it moves the world closer to Armageddon”

“Trump is showing love to Israel because evangelical voters form the crucial linchpin in his relatively small but solid support base. Evangelical voters threw their support behind Trump in 2016 at a higher rate than any previous presidential candidate – giving him 81 percent of their vote, even more than they gave to fellow evangelical George W. Bush.
It was these Christian evangelicals – and Pence, an evangelical himself and a prominent touchstone of their influence in the Trump administration – that were clearly the driving force behind the Jerusalem declaration.”

“Furthermore, the fact the evangelical community’s desire to see Jerusalem being irrevocably in Israeli hands is based on religious beliefs rather than practical political concerns means that a fear of the anticipated violent reaction from Palestinians and the Arab world was easily dismissed as irrelevant by Trump and the decision-makers around him.”

Full Story here:

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/1.827591

 


From Yin to Yang

January 24, 2017

From Yin to Yang

ISRAEL SHAMIR

 • JANUARY 24, 2017

The ascent of Donald Trump is more than a change of tenant of the White House on 1600, Pennsylvania Ave. It is a momentous swing from Yin to Yang, from dark feminine to bright masculine paradigm, from Cybele to Christ. Tremendous resistance to the regime change proves its unique importance.

That’s why the American colour revolution, the attempt to prevent the new president’s reign, took a form of a women’s march. Of a certain type of women wearing their genitals-like pink hats. Not of Saints Mary and Catherine, not of our wives and mothers, but of the wild throng of maenads, the Demented Ones who roamed the forests and in their frenzy they tore men to pieces and devoured their flesh. They hate Christ and admire witches, and for them the murder of a babe in its mother’s womb is not a necessity but their heart’s desire. That’s why they didn’t allow pro-life women to join their rites.

If you prefer a more up-to-date comparison, this is a new Pussy Riot. Perhaps you remember there was a Russian group of that name. They were anti-Putin like the American lot is anti-Trump; they blasphemed like their American counterparts; they were guided and supported by Louise “Madonna” Ciccone, who starred in Washington threatening to blow up the White House. The Russian group tried porno acts, without much avail; they tried politics – no success again; until they finally profaned the Moscow Cathedral. Then they were quickly sentenced to two years of gaol, and since then there has peace between men and women in Russia. Sometimes a swift punishment is the best way to chill feverish minds and pussies.

Pussy Riot-2 were called Femen. You can read their story here. They do not exist anymore, as their leader said recently. And now, Pussy Riot–3, in Washington, another obscene attempt to use women and their bodies for political and religious anti-Christian purposes. Would you be surprised to learn that all three movements had been financed by Jewish hedge fund managers? Why do these men try so hard to manipulate women for gain?

Men love women, we are made that way. We love their beautiful bodies and their compassionate souls, their high spirit and their subtle mind. They are our lovers, friends, comrades. In all the history of art, there was perhaps one poet, Palladas of Alexandria, who said he abhorred women and even that could be a case of sour grapes. Pity that in our post-Christian, or even anti-Christian society a very old type of women has been reconstructed, that of the women who broke with Logos and united with the dark heathen spirit. Debased and debasing, they are eager to serve their Dark Lord of Wall Street.

Even more revolting are the men who had sent these poor misled souls to riot in the cities of America, hoping to provoke police or public violence. They know it was difficult for real men to defend themselves against a women’s attack, and they use that to the utmost.

A Russian Jewish writer Dmitry Bykov considered it a standard Jewish stratagem: they send a woman to provoke a man with nasty words and insults; if he responds, they attack him in defending the offended womanhood, he wrote in his amusing Living Souls. The Jewish masterminds of the virago revolt – George Soros and his fellow billionaire Tom Steyer, who pledged $100 million for the regime change, utilised this time-honoured subterfuge.

The viragos were joined by LGBT, the evil Tetragrammaton, modern worshippers of Cybele. Cybele priests and worshippers castrated themselves in front of their goddess. This is the aim of the gender agenda: castration of the male. Now they have been defeated, as they were defeated centuries ago, and they are not taking it lying down.

So it is not a shift from Democrats to Republicans – it is a shift from Cybele to Christ. This esoteric side of the regime change had been clear to the protagonists. That’s why Trump went to church hand in hand with his lady-wife just before the oath, thus ceremonially restoring the normal order of things. That’s why Trump by his first blessed act has removed the LGBT smut page off the White House site, restoring its whiteness.

Media, “a false witness who breathes out lies and sows discord among brothers” (The Proverbs are always the best for quotes!) reported “a million participants” in “Washington and elsewhere”. This was very modest of them. I’d expect a billion demonstrating “elsewhere”, or at least six million, a good and familiar number. There is no way to check the “elsewhere” numbers. Not only beauty, but the numbers are also in the eyes of the beholder; they saw just a few onlookers at the ceremony, but multitudes of the maenads from Seattle to Rhode Island marching to Washington DC to devour Trump as they devoured Orpheus.

This is the end of the Yin era of gender disorder. The era of kind old ladies assuming leadership on behalf of the unseen puppeteers. The era of unisex toilets instead of equality. The era of political correctness instead of correcting policies. The era of men being ashamed of their manhood and of women manipulated by hedge fund managers.

Even the best deeds of the departing regime were marked by gender disorder. Like Obama’s pardon of Bradley Manning. I am really happy that this man will (hopefully) regain his freedom, after years in the Gestapo cellars. Yes, Gestapo: Trump correctly compared the US secret services with those of the Third Reich. Manning had been kept naked and chained and humiliated and tortured. Not many prisoners of the German Gestapo suffered that much. At the end of his wits, he chose to give up his manhood. A tragic gesture. I wonder which of his tormentors gave him that advice.

He did not become a woman, for a man can’t become a woman. Here I fully agree with Germaine Greer, the old feminist. Only God can make a woman. A man can only turn himself into a castrated transvestite. This fate was prepared for our sons by the domineering Yin. A sad fate for a man who gave us, gave to mankind, raw and precious data on the real election meddling in dozens of countries. Not the fake one by “Russian hackers”, but the real one by the US State Department and secret services in the interest of NWO promoters. Now they have been defeated on their home ground by the American people, and Bradley Manning contributed hugely to that achievement.

But the media purred approvingly of “Chelsea Manning” and of “her” future as of a free “woman.” What a silly choice of words! Well, let him be free and sort out his life.

The departing Yin era has brought feminism ad absurdum. So many recent movies catered to this demand. Their constant bleating of “four legs good, two legs bad” was used as a device to drown out any opposition, wrote George Orwell. In the Yin times, it was “vagina good, penis bad”, but the bleating was equally persistent. All great discoveries were made by women, while men just appropriated them – that was the logic behind the new version of Ghostbusters and of The Hidden Figures. The last film perfected the idea by crediting not just any women, but black ones. God knows there are wonderful black women like Cynthia McKinney, who rebelled against the Jewish lobby in the occupied Capitol, but she was not the one they meant.

The history of arts has been re-written. In real life, women inspired (almost) every artist, but there were very few female artists. In the re-written history, Artemisia Gentileschi, an accomplished if second-rate woman-painter of the 17th century, eclipsed her contemporaries in the number of studies. Vagina good, penis bad.

Homosexuality has been the most glorified gender disorder in Yin era. Some of the male homosexuals were great artists, writers and warriors; however they had a troubled and treacherous personality. The best homosexual writer of the 20th century, Jean Genet, glorified cruelty, betrayal and murder in his wonderful Our Lady of Flowers. Art achievement is not a proof of a reliable good personality, more often, it is other way around.

We aren’t allowed to say it anymore, but a few years ago it was received wisdom that homosexuals are treacherous and unreliable, definitely unsuitable for a public office of trust. This quality has endeared them with the Masters who need untrustworthy people, who would easily betray public trust, to fill important political positions.

A great Italian writer and war journalist Curzio Malaparte in his shocking book on American occupation/liberation of Naples called The Skin (“what a man will do, what deeds of heroism and infamy he can accomplish, to save his skin”) noticed readiness of the homos to happily accept occupation and to please the invading army. For this sharp observation he had been ostracised by much of the modern media, but indeed native homosexuals are good for an occupying army. Israel takes care of Palestinian gays and even gives them a sort of asylum. Gay International (in words of Joseph Massad) has been instrumental in a sort of colonisation of the Arab world. This could provide an additional explanation of why the Masters supported and promoted this unnatural behaviour, as they treat their own countries as occupied territories.

This is not a call for any action against these people beyond pushing them back to their dens. Mankind lives with such disorders and even gets some benefits from their outrages; but never before such a disorder has been “celebrated” as a new norm. There is nothing to celebrate. Go back to your closets, you poor tormented souls, together with BDSM, paedophiles and other pizza consumers, and stay there.

If there is a topic that generated a lot of dislike abroad for the US it was for pushing the same sex agenda. The US is/was the only superpower, so few countries refused to comply with their violent and vehement push for the deviants’ “rights”, but nobody liked it, not even Americans, judging by the election results. One of the secrets of Putin’s popularity in Russia is his stubborn resistance to the previous American regime demands to popularise sexual deviance. Private life in Russia is free and unhindered, but the deviants who want to celebrate their deviance in a public space in the presence of minors are stopped. In very tolerant France, President Hollande’s insistence on forcing same-sex “marriage” in the face of huge popular opposition allowed him to achieve the lowest rating ever obtained by a ruling French leader. Hopefully President Trump will not force us to witness unnatural acts in public.

It would be good to roll the viragos back, too. They infect their impressionable sisters by their wild misbehaviour, and turn men’s life into hell. Among good and great deeds of Putin I’d list his suppression of Pussy Riot, the previous incarnation of the pink vaginas marching on the White House.

Wherever you witness a battle against Logos, against Christ and against nature, you’d expect to meet some Jews. Indeed Jewish hedge fund managers paid for the pussy riots while Jewish-owned media provided them with free and plentiful publicity. So where do the Jews stand in relation to Trump?

Let’s face it, the Jews do not like Trump (always excepting some individuals for free will can beat ethnic affiliation any time). There are Zionist Jews including Prime Minister Netanyahu who think Trump can be good for the Jews. But then, there were Zionist Jews who thought Hitler would be good for the Jews. They tried, and succeeded in running a profitable business with Nazi Germany between 1933 and 1941. In the face of Jewish American establishment displeasure, they traded for millions of dollars with the Nazi enemy and profited hugely, as Germany experienced difficulties in its foreign trade because of the Jewish boycott. Hitler hoped this trade with the Zionists would improve his relations with the important American Jewish community, but in vain.

So it is an old Jewish stratagem: the main body of Jews fights an enemy, while a secondary hedging movement has a profitable relation with the enemy. Now, the main forces of Jews fight Trump and everything he stands for. The Jews in the Congress and Senate, Jews in the mass media from Hollywood to NY Times are against Trump. But the hedging secondary Zionist branch supports Trump as they hope he will give them a lot.

Now Israelis plan to annex some parts of the West Bank and they hope to bring the US embassy to Jerusalem. The Zionist Jews are in a rush because they are afraid Trump will understand sooner or later that he gets very little from the Zionists in return. Zionists can’t influence the main Jewish body to any large extent. Google searching for “Trump antisemite” produces half a million hits; much of it is very recent. Let’s just mention an opinion piece by Bernard-Henri Levy in the NY Times explaining that Trump is a swineherd who wants to destroy the Jews through his ostensibly kind acts. In short, extreme Zionists – or Ultra-Orthodox Jews – can’t deliver goods Trump wants. So unless he wants to provide for them just for pleasure of being nice to some Jews, this relationship is not likely to last long, and may end in sorrow.

For the Jews support financial institutions from the Federal Reserve to banks to hedge funds; they profit from open borders, they are for immigration and they are usually against popular leaders and politicians. By every logical reason, they will be against Trump – while the Israelis will try to milk Trump as much and as fast as they can.

However, none of it, nor Jews neither viragos and deviants present a deadly threat. This is an opposition and a bother one can live with. The victory of the Yang can’t and won’t be total. Yin and Yang co-exist forever, it is just a question of proportion. President Trump should not even wish for total victory and elimination of Yin elements. It will suffice to push them into their proper subservient place, out of the centre of cultural and economic life. Subservience of the Yang is abnormal, but Yin should keep a modest place. Hopefully this will be achieved.

Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@…

This article was first published at The Unz Review.


Jackie Evancho: Someday At Christmas

January 4, 2017